<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Groundbreaking gay marriage trial starts in Calif</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/11/groundbreaking-gay-marriage-trial-starts-in-calif/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/11/groundbreaking-gay-marriage-trial-starts-in-calif/</link>
	<description>The Daily Caller features breaking news, opinion, research, and entertainment 24 hours a day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 03:39:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: literroy</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/11/groundbreaking-gay-marriage-trial-starts-in-calif/comment-page-1/#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator>literroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/11/groundbreaking-gay-marriage-trial-starts-in-calif/#comment-563</guid>
		<description>The problem with your assertion that it&#039;s not the government&#039;s job to define marriage is that the government provides numerous benefits to married couples.  If it&#039;s going to continue to do that (and while I&#039;m absolutely up to a discussion of not giving married couples special rights anymore, that&#039;s a different issue entirely), it needs to define what counts as marriage.

So the question at stake here is: do we let all couples share the benefits of marriage, or continue to hide behind a particular interpretation of religion along with some vague, indefinable sense of tradition to deny certain people and their relationships equal standing under the law?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with your assertion that it&#8217;s not the government&#8217;s job to define marriage is that the government provides numerous benefits to married couples.  If it&#8217;s going to continue to do that (and while I&#8217;m absolutely up to a discussion of not giving married couples special rights anymore, that&#8217;s a different issue entirely), it needs to define what counts as marriage.</p>
<p>So the question at stake here is: do we let all couples share the benefits of marriage, or continue to hide behind a particular interpretation of religion along with some vague, indefinable sense of tradition to deny certain people and their relationships equal standing under the law?
<p align="right"><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=563" , 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snarcotic</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/11/groundbreaking-gay-marriage-trial-starts-in-calif/comment-page-1/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>snarcotic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/11/groundbreaking-gay-marriage-trial-starts-in-calif/#comment-402</guid>
		<description>&quot;The first federal trial to determine if the U.S. Constitution prohibits states from outlawing same-sex marriage gets under way in San Francisco on Monday, and the two gay couples on whose behalf the case was brought will be among the first witnesses.&quot;

It&#039;s entertaining that this is even up to question.

The Constitution doesn&#039;t say anything about it. It&#039;s not a federal matter. It&#039;s not even a government matter. It&#039;s not the government&#039;s job to define marriage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The first federal trial to determine if the U.S. Constitution prohibits states from outlawing same-sex marriage gets under way in San Francisco on Monday, and the two gay couples on whose behalf the case was brought will be among the first witnesses.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s entertaining that this is even up to question.</p>
<p>The Constitution doesn&#8217;t say anything about it. It&#8217;s not a federal matter. It&#8217;s not even a government matter. It&#8217;s not the government&#8217;s job to define marriage.
<p align="right"><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=402" , 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Never Yet Melted &#187; Monday, January 11, 2010</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/11/groundbreaking-gay-marriage-trial-starts-in-calif/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Never Yet Melted &#187; Monday, January 11, 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/11/groundbreaking-gay-marriage-trial-starts-in-calif/#comment-145</guid>
		<description>[...]  Lawsuit begins in California federal court contending that the US Constitution mandates Gay Marriag... Wouldn&#8217;t Gouverneur Morris be surprised? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Lawsuit begins in California federal court contending that the US Constitution mandates Gay Marriag&#8230; Wouldn&#8217;t Gouverneur Morris be surprised? [...]
<p align="right"><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=145" , 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

