<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s tough year in public opinion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/21/obamas-tough-year-in-public-opinion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/21/obamas-tough-year-in-public-opinion/</link>
	<description>The Daily Caller features breaking news, opinion, research, and entertainment 24 hours a day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:40:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rfpzzzzz</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/21/obamas-tough-year-in-public-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-7856</link>
		<dc:creator>rfpzzzzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=280000#comment-7856</guid>
		<description>If you are saying that Reps have an opportunity because of the horror of the Dem reality and that Reps actually need a platform of ideas supporters can rally around , then I agree. 
I am also curious how anyone who pays attention enough to know they do not like Obama/Dem policies still like Obama. He lies incessantly, provides no real leadership and demagogues and demeans large sectors of our economy. This is the worst president of my lifetime. 
Reps should have a specific set of ideas to support rather than just running around calling themselves conservatives. The term is so overused it has lost real meaning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are saying that Reps have an opportunity because of the horror of the Dem reality and that Reps actually need a platform of ideas supporters can rally around , then I agree.<br />
I am also curious how anyone who pays attention enough to know they do not like Obama/Dem policies still like Obama. He lies incessantly, provides no real leadership and demagogues and demeans large sectors of our economy. This is the worst president of my lifetime.<br />
Reps should have a specific set of ideas to support rather than just running around calling themselves conservatives. The term is so overused it has lost real meaning.
<p align="right"><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=7856" , 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moira1987</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/21/obamas-tough-year-in-public-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-7368</link>
		<dc:creator>moira1987</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=280000#comment-7368</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t dismiss Kellyanne&#039;s analysis and suggestions out of hand. She makes good points. Some of her points have already be highlighted in Scott Brown&#039;s campaign. He used the internet to run circles around Coakley. And she&#039;s right about embracing Hispanic and Asian Americans. In fact, I agree with her 110%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t dismiss Kellyanne&#8217;s analysis and suggestions out of hand. She makes good points. Some of her points have already be highlighted in Scott Brown&#8217;s campaign. He used the internet to run circles around Coakley. And she&#8217;s right about embracing Hispanic and Asian Americans. In fact, I agree with her 110%.
<p align="right"><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=7368" , 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hurtzallot</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/21/obamas-tough-year-in-public-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-6920</link>
		<dc:creator>hurtzallot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=280000#comment-6920</guid>
		<description>This administration creates (AKA makes up bull-$hit) things extremely well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This administration creates (AKA makes up bull-$hit) things extremely well.
<p align="right"><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=6920" , 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curlycat</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/21/obamas-tough-year-in-public-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-6856</link>
		<dc:creator>curlycat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=280000#comment-6856</guid>
		<description>Quote:The president, of course, remains personally popular and has time to recover - Quote end
Since when do the pollsters ask the question of &quot;personally popular&quot;? I can not remember having heard this about other sitting Presidents. So why was this category created this time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote:The president, of course, remains personally popular and has time to recover &#8211; Quote end<br />
Since when do the pollsters ask the question of &#8220;personally popular&#8221;? I can not remember having heard this about other sitting Presidents. So why was this category created this time?
<p align="right"><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=6856" , 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lamecherry</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/21/obamas-tough-year-in-public-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-6525</link>
		<dc:creator>lamecherry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 06:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=280000#comment-6525</guid>
		<description>Why should readers accept your bias as a rendition on how to fix what was not broken by Republicans?
Your historical perspective if finite, for example Ronald Reagan made broad inroads to the Hispanic voters and when the patricians surrounding George H. W. Bush achieved power on the backs of Hispanics, they were ignored in the same sequence when Christians were told to shut up, and Dan Quayle Conservatives were left to hang out to dry.

The &quot;Republican&quot; you indicate which is not Reaganite, nor Goldwater, nor Hoover, nor even Teddy Roosevelt or Abraham Lincoln is but a recent spectre upon the scene of sticking a finger to the wind and finding popularity.

America never goes out of fashion for those who love her. If by your comments you just evoked the image that Bush and McCain are &quot;stupid&quot; because they do not speak in tech, then there are equal proportions beyond your world who find people who speak in such shallow terms as lacking existential experience.
Gov. Palin knowing the trials of an Alaskan fishing trawler is mocked in urbania, yet for those who value such expertise, she is an expert who is proven in deeds and not words.

One does not change the Secular American Doctrine to suit Obamites of the moment, but instead converts the ignorant to a better way, or, else all you end up with a big tent of Pelosi robbery rejected by the masses for the correct term it is in unAmerican, a change from the American system, and, what the Founders warned against future children from playing with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should readers accept your bias as a rendition on how to fix what was not broken by Republicans?<br />
Your historical perspective if finite, for example Ronald Reagan made broad inroads to the Hispanic voters and when the patricians surrounding George H. W. Bush achieved power on the backs of Hispanics, they were ignored in the same sequence when Christians were told to shut up, and Dan Quayle Conservatives were left to hang out to dry.</p>
<p>The &#8220;Republican&#8221; you indicate which is not Reaganite, nor Goldwater, nor Hoover, nor even Teddy Roosevelt or Abraham Lincoln is but a recent spectre upon the scene of sticking a finger to the wind and finding popularity.</p>
<p>America never goes out of fashion for those who love her. If by your comments you just evoked the image that Bush and McCain are &#8220;stupid&#8221; because they do not speak in tech, then there are equal proportions beyond your world who find people who speak in such shallow terms as lacking existential experience.<br />
Gov. Palin knowing the trials of an Alaskan fishing trawler is mocked in urbania, yet for those who value such expertise, she is an expert who is proven in deeds and not words.</p>
<p>One does not change the Secular American Doctrine to suit Obamites of the moment, but instead converts the ignorant to a better way, or, else all you end up with a big tent of Pelosi robbery rejected by the masses for the correct term it is in unAmerican, a change from the American system, and, what the Founders warned against future children from playing with.
<p align="right"><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=6525" , 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

