That’s false. Intelligent people do both. They read and watch. And don’t underestimate the power of visual satire. You don’t think that SNL sketches have an impact?

She will learn as she grows “older” that intelligent people read and unintelligent people watch video. It is a completely different psychological profile, and, it is one which has “older people” smiling at a younger person’s thinking that a message can be gotten to them to sway their vote.

The example of Scott Brown in internet connections is invalid. He was a focal point due to other factors, namely the Tea Dunkers who drove this issue and are still driving issues. This then links into the Birthers who if one researches were formed by the original single cell movement of one Lawrence Sinclair, a homosexual handicapped Democratic male, who with Jeff Rense were the first force blocking Barack Hussein Obama, when the GOP was sitting on it’s Baldy Schmidt hands or the rest of the maniacs were praising Obama.

That is the reality of the “movement” as these “older voters” have been driving these issues and not the other way around in being targeted as they are too savvy to be sucked in by any media. They have played this game, saw Nixon brought down, watched Reagan trashed and seen Bill Clinton get away with crimes.

Barack Hussein Obama had record numbers of followers, but they immediately dropped in not viewing his videos online. The internet is not a medium of value without a group generating outside interest, and then that blogger group drives what the media and the public is discussing.
Mr. Obama had many planted shills around the internet “targeting older voters” in stalking them and challenging every post and blog with maniacal rants.
I know this as I was one of the few who was writing about all of this and being cheered by Americans as no one else was laying a glove on Mr. Obama.

All of these “experts” now rushing in to build on the efforts of these older voters who stormed the internet walls, in thinking they are going to target them, and make political fodder of them, have revealed their ignorance of the entire process. They have no idea that one blogger will post a story, 100 times faster than a newspaper, 75 times faster than CNN, 50 times faster than news site online, 10 times faster than a Rush Limbaugh, and will in information be driving the real news story of the day, because these older voters are speaking to the issues and can not be fooled by politicians.

Do not confuse 1 line comments with this group, nor the people who herd to the New York Times. If the older voters were on the Times, it would not be going broke. Matt Drudge drives stories as do Hannity and Limbaugh, that is the base structure of media hits online. The rest is the bloggers who then dig and post what no one else will say or touch, because bloggers are not being paid to follow the party line.

Some unasked for advice to Ms. Mair, you did Gov. Pawlenty no favors in this and are not doing the GOP any favors. As your being a young voter, I can point to several immensely offensive things you posted in your “target” which will now have Gov. Pawlenty if he makes it through to the presidential run, have these same “older voters” hearing from bloggers about Pawlenty has that Liz Mair targeting voters.
RRespectfully, there is a difference between what Karl Rove reveals and what he is doing politically. You need to take stock in what you reveal in attempting to appear you are in the Karl Rove or Dick Morris league, as you did yourself no favors for yourself or the people who pay you money to explain the internet circus.