The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller

Pandas are still fat, stupid jerks

Just in case you’d forgotten. I don’t like them. I don’t like the fact that anybody else likes them. I can tolerate people I like who like them, but only just.

But still. Awwwww!

Frances Nguyen laughs lightly after a brief sigh. She fights back emotions as she reflects on what’s taken place in her life over the past few years—first, a husband and, now, a baby on the way. In a way, she owes both to Tai Shan.

Before Tai Shan, Nguyen had no real interest in pandas. It wasn’t until she viewed the lovable guy on his Web cam—courtesy of the zoo—and noticed his human-like behavior that she became intrigued. So intrigued that she eventually founded Pandas Unlimited, a fan club that raises awareness on panda conservation. Most of its members were single women—love through a chance encounter with a fellow panda enthusiast was the last thing on Nguyen’s mind.

It’s fitting that they’re having a kid. I hope it makes Tai Shan feel even worse about himself for being unable to. Shame on you, Tai Shan.

  • voxpopuli

    Nobody forgot about your hatred of pandas, because nobody cared in the first place.

    • wanderincynic

      Projection, voxtrolluli, a psychological concept, look it up…& if you didn’t care, why are you hanging around here? There’s a thin line, between love & hate…

    • slightlyaboveaverage

      boxnozzleguy:

      “Nobody forgot about your hatred of pandas, because nobody cared in the first place.”

      I presume you include yourself in the “nobody” generalization you’ve made here.
      I can’t look in to your heart to see if you actually care or not, but I can look at the dates of Treacher’s posting and your subsequent comment. Three whole days had gone by (I commented February 3 at 2:44 pm, and your ‘contribution’ appeared February 6 at 6:07 pm). Math isn’t my strong suit, is 74.5 hours about right?
      Nothing says desperation quite like that:
      Going back in time three whole days.
      Think of all the good you could have accomplished in that time. You could’ve painted out graffiti, picked up litter along the freeway, read to senior citizens, cleaned up your room so your mom doesn’t trip over things when she brings in your folded laundry.

      Instead you seem to obsess about garnering Treacher’s approval. When you were done calling Treacher a “crybaby,” and accusing his “neocon buddies” of “a bunch of whining,” you came back to a post from three days earlier to insult him. Seriously, you come across as a jilted stalker who has vowed to get revenge in spite of the overwhelming evidence you lack the ability.

      Is your intention with this behavior to persuade readers that your views on any given topic are superior to Treacher’s (or the readers’)? Needless to say your methods are hardly informative or compelling. And simply differentiating yourself from the david878s of the world does not mean you are not a troll. You are a nuisance, just taking a different form… A child screaming for attention, and if you don’t get your chicken strips then no one in this restaurant is going to be happy.

      I can’t stop you from commenting here, but if you feel you must please try to be informative or funny. And if you can’t do either of those limit yourself to the 17 syllables of the time-honored haiku tradition.

  • Pingback: Blogger Hit By Black SUV, Types Version Of Events While Ironically In Basement « Around The Sphere

  • Pingback: State Department is Going All Chicago-Land and Breaking Knees « Snark And Boobs