Growing party’s populari-tea in Black History Month
One of the crowning moments of the Tea Party Movement—a move that allowed the movement to gain even further consideration as a political force—occurred Saturday night when former vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin took the stage at the Tea Party Convention in Nashville and commanded live prime time coverage. The sight of Gov. Palin on stage gave a very strong non-verbal message with the image of her addressing the convention: namely, that the Tea Party is about taking everyday Americans into the fold to stem back the spending from government, the abuses from legislators, and lack of cooperation that impacts the nation, as just it had over the past several years.
One of the limitations of the Tea Party movement was also put on display, just as the cameras panned the audience during Palin’s speech—given on the first Saturday of Black History Month.
The dearth of African Americans visible in the audience Saturday night was eerily reminiscent of the 2008 Republican National Convention, a low point of the GOP despite having its future chairman and possible next African-American senator address the convention during the official three-day event. And although many would inaccurately consider that to be the evidence that most conservatives are racist Republicans that actively pursue returning to the glory days of the 1950s (and the Jim Crow racism fought therein), the critics of the movement and their viewpoints that the movement is limited in its effectiveness has merit. As long as the growing populist movement in America fails to incorporate a greater diversity of Americans (and the growing populations in America) into its fold, it will eventually find itself hitting obstacles that will inhibit its supporters’ ability to win more big elections in November and successfully govern should their candidates win.
This is not to say that the Tea Party movement is racist. As a frequently requested Tea Party public speaker, I can attest to the best intentions of the patriots that I have encountered during the movement. I have been accepted by event organizers, tea party activists, and grassroots supporters alike as an equal American worthy of their attention. Those that I have met have a love of America that disallows for there to be a co-existing hatred for Americans based on skin color, gender, or religion. During my speeches at the events, I have been well-received during my calls to action for a return to the American Way, ones that have intertwined the credos of personal liberty and economic justice for all from a diversity of Americans ranging from Thomas Jefferson to Martin Luther King (even calling King a “20th century Tea Party patriot” in one of my speeches) and Frederick Douglass to Ronald Reagan. And the same time, I have also spoken to the need for us as Americans (notably, conservatives and Tea Party activists) to find avenues through which to improve America without increasing government. I have spoken to the waste of police resources on domestic violence, arguing that if we as a community can eradicate domestic violence throughout our awareness and intolerance of it, we can re-direct millions of dollars in police resources towards eradicating violent crimes, drug proliferation, and illegal immigration in our communities. I have noted that those suffering as one of the 16 percent of the nation underemployed have the opportunity to volunteer in our schools, particularly as we have seen that increased spending by massive school systems does not automatically result in better-educated students and safer school environments but more interaction with students regularly does. I have directed my audiences to meet more neighbors, debate more citizens on the issues, and challenge the barriers between us as we address America’s issues—and to do so with respect for each other and without fear of passionate debate. Unfortunately, I am one of the few to promote these tasks as tea party talking points as much as merely cutting government spending (another needed task.) When Tea Partiers accomplished these tasks as well, the Tea Party movement will have changed from being a movement within America to be a force that moved America—and moved it in a better direction.
In my book, I have repeatedly called this phenomenon, “smaller government, bigger people.” The primary complaints of the Tea Party Movement—e.g., irresponsible government spending, big government control over everyday choices for Americans, more bureaucracy with less efficiency—will never be adequately addressed until there is a universal willingness to address those that benefit from OPEG (Obama Plan to Expand Government). With a Tea Party Convention occurring in Black History Month without much diversity amongst its ranks in Nashville, one of the challenges comes clear: without touching young voters, more urban voters, and—yes—African-American voters, the Tea Party movement will be effective in changing out Congress members but will face a tougher time changing out how government performs.
If the Tea Party folks—and a growing number of Americans – are willing to go with the first half of the “smaller government, bigger people” side of the equation, we must also be willing to invest in the “bigger people” portion of the matter if the end goal is a more competitive, more efficient, and more self-sustaining United States. While fiscal conservatives noted the need for fiscal cuts during the Tea Party Convention as they have throughout the tea party movement, there is also been a relatively silent voice towards remedying the issues of student achievement, single-parent households, lack of global competitiveness, and fixation on fast lives and early deaths that dangerously rock our youth from being the next generation of leaders to being a potentially lost group of Americans. All of the previously mentioned challenges already impact black America to the point of rendering a large swath of our youth irrelevant—aside from burdening America through disproportionately taxing the system in a disadvantageous fashion because of limitations stopping them from being contributors to society as their forefathers were for generations.
Until the Tea Party movement finds a way to embrace diversity (just in the same way that the GOP has needed to do the same) while finding ways to eliminate the needs for (and, thus, the emotional binds to) big government and its programs, the battle for America’s soul—and collective wallet—will remain a segmented fight that unfairly brands some as separatist and radical without giving others a tangible reason to join the movement. This includes a large majority of African Americans, a group that consistently polls conservative and votes Democratic with minimal results for improving our communities.
Racist rhetoric by a small minority of Tea Party-goers (such as the “Obama Witch Doctor” posters) is not acceptable at all from the movement, but advancing the history of men such as Wentworth Cheswell –a Black Revolutionary-era patriot selected to draft New York’s first constitution—should be. Black History Month is the opportunity that the movement should not miss upon, particularly if it wants to break the cycles of government spending and self-purposed bureaucracy that finds its roots in local and state governments that count on urban plight to maintain its toxic philosophical influence—one that threatens black America at a disproportionate rate robbing us of the Vivien Thomases, Ben Carsons, and Colin Powells that could help turn America around as some of the “bigger people” that we need today.
The Tea Party movement has already shown the ability to impact the nation. However, the contrast from Saturday night highlighted that there is a gap to address if the tea party is going to change the nation for the better. Should more tea partiers choose to make Black History Month the springboard to taking their Americanism to another level, it may not be long before the movement becomes truly historic—and the strangleholds of fiscal irresponsibly, big-government ideology, and Democratic control of black voters become history.
Lenny McAllister is a syndicated political commentator and the author of the book, “Diary of a Mad Black PYC (Proud Young Conservative)”. He has been featured on multiple outlets and shows including XM Radio’s “The New School”, Fox Charlotte’s “Fox News Rising,” CNN’s “Newsroom,” and Fox News’ “Glenn Beck.” Follow him on Twitter as @lennyhhr and on Facebook.































Lenny is 100% correct. Now what? We have no idea how to reach people who have been taught that we are the enemy or that we are the ones who are the racists. Lenny, I’ve met black folks who believe that Lincoln was a democrat. That the KKK were GOPers. That Bull Conner and George Wallace were from the right. Many black women don’t get that humanism and abortion is not elevating and that anyone who believes it is bad is a racist.
How do we reach out if we get scalded and scolded by the Jacksons’, Sharptons’, and even the Keanye Wests’? People have it imprinted on them at birth and can’t see that the rising tide raises all boats but the end of prosperity means losing out for all.
irishpol, Lenny is giving us a clue and we should take that baton and run with it. So how? Tell us Obi Wan, we seriously would if we could.
Dear Lenny McAllister, I totally agree with you that we need to reach out to people of color but how? It seems the average, normal, decent, hardworking person of color (geez Lenny, we don’t even have words to describe our brothers and sisters from other mothers/fathers) have all been told that Lincoln was a democrat, JFK was their friend, that the KKK were/are GOPers. Anything we say is deemed racist but the likes of Sharpton and Jackson. And I mean everything we say.
Whenever I see faces at a Tea Party event that are more pigmented, I have to resist scaring them off with a hug fest.
If we tried to do an outreach, we would be accused of some evil plan. If we don’t try, we are accused of exclusion. Tell us how we can get our neighbors Wide Awake.
Thanks.
ps. to irishpol, dude, Lenny is giving us a clue, we should take it, say Thank You, and try to use it for our benefit.
Please folks can we stop with the race thing. Let’s focus on how we are the same and the things we have in common. With the Tea Party it is about ideas and these ideas can be accepted and embraced by anyone. All are welcome and there should be no pandering.
Give it time, Mr. McAllister. There are already some blacks at the rallies. I personally witnessed a black man railing through a bull horn at the very gates of the White House on April 15, 2009. MSM was conspicuous by its absence.
There are also many well known black conservatives, e.g. Thomas Sowell, Walter E. Williams, and Herman Cain come to mind. I believe these guys will soon be getting their rightful platform in the national discourse, denied for so long by MSM actively assisiting in keeping the black vote on the Democrat plantation.
http://libertyatstake.blogspot.com/
Crimson–Their image? Do you really believe that the Tea Party movement has a racist image? To say that you couldn’t possibly ever have attended a Tea Party rally, because if you did you’d see that never once have the organizers failed to involve one or more black speakers on the platform. Not once have I ever witnessed even an insignificant racist slight from any of the organizers, speakers or participants at a rally—and I’ve attended at least a half dozen including the 9/12 gathering on the mall. If I were a racist I’d say that the blacks of America are being racist by their failure to attend these rallies in sufficient numbers, but that would be no less absurd than saying the Tea Party movement is not doing enough to “attract” blacks at the protests. For whatever reason or reasons in their collective heads, black America has decided at this point in time that the Tea Party movement is not their “cup of tea”. I think they’re wrong, and I hope they collectively reconsider; but notwithstanding their collective decision, how in the world can you say that the “image” of the movement should be changed and not mean the message. No, I didn’t misread that article, I’m afraid you did.
Hey irishpol, you completely misread this. He’s not saying that the Tea Party movement needs to change their message of fiscal responsibility but instead just change their image so that minorities feel welcome to take part in this movement of all Americans.
In all due respect, you’re simply dead wrong. What you seem to be saying is that since the blacks are not attending the Tea Party gatherings in sufficient numbers, the Tea Party movement must “fine-tune” their message to attract a larger number of blacks. Your thesis is outrageous and is nothing less than racist commentary. Tucker Carlson and The DC should be embarrassed for publishing it—Black History month or not. Without question what you have to say is absolutely politically correct, but still, pure racism. I suppose if we were to hear from Andrew Sullivan on the make-up of this convention, we’d be hearing that he didn’t see enough openly gays waving their little rainbow flags. But if you believe that identity politics is what the Founder’s of this great nation had in mind for it, I’d strongly suggest you read some of those history books Glenn Beck has been touting. For many years we were told that an individual should be judged on their character and not the color of their skin. But now you tell us that a head-count at a Tea Party rally will decide whether or not that movement is going to be found “acceptable” by the American people. This is what the MSM and the entrenched politicians have been telling us for the past 40 years, and look where it’s gotten us! Well, sir, you may be black, but speaking as a non-racist white man, you have no more and no less rights and privileges in America than I do. And if Americans are foolish enough to buy into the snake oil you’re selling, they’ll deserve what they’ll get.