Comments on: Supreme Court Justice Hillary Clinton?

By: diannr

diannr — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:38:30 +0000

Heh. That’s funny. Heh. Wait. This isn’t the Onion?!

By: robjh1

robjh1 — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:03:56 +0000

People dump on the Clintons but they always seem to rise above it all and prove their critics wrong. Eat crow loosers!

By: Can you think of anything scarier than this? « Diary of a Mad Conservative

Can you think of anything scarier than this? « Diary of a Mad Conservative — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:36:22 +0000

[...] Another self admitted “progressive” on the Supreme Court. [...]

By: Brendan Foy

Brendan Foy — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:34:22 +0000

Two more words and a number: Landslide Fall 2010. If Obama gets TWO Supreme Court picks, that is it, every conservative and their dog needs to show up to the pollls and vote. All efforts will have to be put on the Senate to try and pull off what seemed impossible only several months ago, the retaking of the Senate.

Hillary would make sense as a pick for Obama, she’s well known, popular in the polls these days and some of the more weak willed Republican Senators (Graham, Collins, Snowe) will vote for her. Putting her on the bench also ensures that she will not get any idead of running against Obama in a primary if his poll numbers really drop. Don’t think for a second she wouldn’t primary him if given the chance.

By: bayview

bayview — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:11:12 +0000

On the other hand, if justice is blind, David Paterson has the inside track as the next Supreme.

By: bayview

bayview — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:07:44 +0000

Two vacancies? Let’s have another historical first like electing the race transcending Barry: A Husband and Wife team of Supremes. Introducing Bill and Hill, ran up a Jill. (not to mention a convenient way to rid Barry a pesky primary challenge from Hillabroom.)

By: wrenchie

wrenchie — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:36:24 +0000

Justice Clinton is one of the more humorous oxymorons I have contemplated.