<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hawks we are, hawks we must remain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/02/hawks-we-are-hawks-we-must-remain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/02/hawks-we-are-hawks-we-must-remain/</link>
	<description>The Daily Caller features breaking news, opinion, research, and entertainment 24 hours a day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:40:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leave Afghanistan &#124; thelobbyist</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/02/hawks-we-are-hawks-we-must-remain/comment-page-2/#comment-172918</link>
		<dc:creator>Leave Afghanistan &#124; thelobbyist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=516487#comment-172918</guid>
		<description>[...] friend Tom Qualtere, who works for The Heritage Foundation, wrote an op-ed for Daily Caller back in March, and in it he said that Millennial/Generation Y Americans “are the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] friend Tom Qualtere, who works for The Heritage Foundation, wrote an op-ed for Daily Caller back in March, and in it he said that Millennial/Generation Y Americans “are the [...]
<p align="right"><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=172918" , 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deaths &#171; Extractiv</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/02/hawks-we-are-hawks-we-must-remain/comment-page-2/#comment-47339</link>
		<dc:creator>Deaths &#171; Extractiv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=516487#comment-47339</guid>
		<description>[...] http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/02/hawks-we-are-hawks-we-must-remain/ As Patrick Henry is claimed to have said, I know not what course others may take-but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/02/hawks-we-are-hawks-we-must-remain/"  rel="nofollow">http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/02/hawks-we-are-hawks-we-must-remain/</a> As Patrick Henry is claimed to have said, I know not what course others may take-but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death. [...]
<p align="right"><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=47339" , 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samadams</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/02/hawks-we-are-hawks-we-must-remain/comment-page-2/#comment-36623</link>
		<dc:creator>samadams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=516487#comment-36623</guid>
		<description>Qualtere fired the first shot with this article, and straight-up ended the war with this one: http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/04/the-enemy-within/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Qualtere fired the first shot with this article, and straight-up ended the war with this one: <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/04/the-enemy-within/"  rel="nofollow">http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/04/the-enemy-within/</a>
<p align="right"><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=36623" , 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the911generation</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/02/hawks-we-are-hawks-we-must-remain/comment-page-1/#comment-35948</link>
		<dc:creator>the911generation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 08:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=516487#comment-35948</guid>
		<description>Elliot,

You are the precisely the greatest danger America faces.

Libertarians are tearing apart the very fabric of American conservatism. You love to parade as intellectuals and great ideologues but in the midst of it- you just don&#039;t get it. You don&#039;t understand it.

You are not a patriot. You are not a freedom-loving person- you are just a leftist under the banner of freedom hidden in the right-wing spectrum of politics.

It&#039;s high time all the conservative institutions and think tanks like the Heritage Foundation and the Leadership Institute get rid of the anti-war libertarians. They are the antithesis of everything that makes America great. Too much of the Washington conservative movement has been overrun by you libertarian leftists. You aren&#039;t social conservatives. It&#039;s time to break up the big love-in. Reagan conservatives, not libertarian softies.

Qualtere was on the money.  America is good, and better than the rest. It&#039;s that simple. We are the light of the democracy in the world- and the first people to come to any country or people&#039;s assistance when they need us. We have everything to be proud of and nothing to be ashamed of.

We want good, proud conservatives, not half-arsed, limpdick, unpatriotic, happy-go-lucky, I want to be free to smoke-my-weed libertarians like you.

Grow a set.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elliot,</p>
<p>You are the precisely the greatest danger America faces.</p>
<p>Libertarians are tearing apart the very fabric of American conservatism. You love to parade as intellectuals and great ideologues but in the midst of it- you just don&#8217;t get it. You don&#8217;t understand it.</p>
<p>You are not a patriot. You are not a freedom-loving person- you are just a leftist under the banner of freedom hidden in the right-wing spectrum of politics.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s high time all the conservative institutions and think tanks like the Heritage Foundation and the Leadership Institute get rid of the anti-war libertarians. They are the antithesis of everything that makes America great. Too much of the Washington conservative movement has been overrun by you libertarian leftists. You aren&#8217;t social conservatives. It&#8217;s time to break up the big love-in. Reagan conservatives, not libertarian softies.</p>
<p>Qualtere was on the money.  America is good, and better than the rest. It&#8217;s that simple. We are the light of the democracy in the world- and the first people to come to any country or people&#8217;s assistance when they need us. We have everything to be proud of and nothing to be ashamed of.</p>
<p>We want good, proud conservatives, not half-arsed, limpdick, unpatriotic, happy-go-lucky, I want to be free to smoke-my-weed libertarians like you.</p>
<p>Grow a set.
<p align="right"><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=35948" , 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Young Americans for Liberty &#187; YAL on The Daily Caller!</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/02/hawks-we-are-hawks-we-must-remain/comment-page-1/#comment-35772</link>
		<dc:creator>Young Americans for Liberty &#187; YAL on The Daily Caller!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=516487#comment-35772</guid>
		<description>[...] the Daily Caller, as it was Jeff Frazee and Bonnie Kristian who saw the potential in responding to a neoconservative view on foreign policy, and Bonnie who gave me some editing suggestions while I wrote the article. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Daily Caller, as it was Jeff Frazee and Bonnie Kristian who saw the potential in responding to a neoconservative view on foreign policy, and Bonnie who gave me some editing suggestions while I wrote the article. [...]
<p align="right"><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=35772" , 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Young Americans for Liberty &#187; Eagles we were, eagles we will be again</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/02/hawks-we-are-hawks-we-must-remain/comment-page-1/#comment-35770</link>
		<dc:creator>Young Americans for Liberty &#187; Eagles we were, eagles we will be again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=516487#comment-35770</guid>
		<description>[...] following article is a response to Thomas Qualtere of The Heritage Foundation&#8217;s recent article &#8220;Hawks we are, hawks we must remain,&#8221; published on the Web site of The Daily [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] following article is a response to Thomas Qualtere of The Heritage Foundation&#8217;s recent article &#8220;Hawks we are, hawks we must remain,&#8221; published on the Web site of The Daily [...]
<p align="right"><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=35770" , 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Michael</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/02/hawks-we-are-hawks-we-must-remain/comment-page-1/#comment-35493</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 19:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=516487#comment-35493</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s easy for you to say we should do whatever it takes to &quot;win&quot; in Afghanistan.  That&#039;s very brave of you to stand up and sacrifice other people&#039;s sons, daughers, husbands, wives, fathers, mothers and daughters to uphold your view of conservative and American pride.  What will be more shameful, pulling out of Afghanistan with a public declaration that we will no longer waste American resources rebuilding a corrupt country outside of our national interest? Or leaving when because the United States is broke, with thousands more dead brave Americans having made the ultimate sacrifice? Why ignore the tragic lesson of Vietnam?  Why ignore the fact that this same insane foreign policy had us funnelling billions to Saddam Hussein Osama Bin Laden not that long ago?

Our country is broke, and our failed foreign policy is much to blame. Your emotionally charged argument is one that I would have wholeheartedly supported until I was awoken from my neocon slumber by Dr. Paul. Unfortunately, we can no longer affort to ignore the history of blowback and the reality of our fiscal insolvency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s easy for you to say we should do whatever it takes to &#8220;win&#8221; in Afghanistan.  That&#8217;s very brave of you to stand up and sacrifice other people&#8217;s sons, daughers, husbands, wives, fathers, mothers and daughters to uphold your view of conservative and American pride.  What will be more shameful, pulling out of Afghanistan with a public declaration that we will no longer waste American resources rebuilding a corrupt country outside of our national interest? Or leaving when because the United States is broke, with thousands more dead brave Americans having made the ultimate sacrifice? Why ignore the tragic lesson of Vietnam?  Why ignore the fact that this same insane foreign policy had us funnelling billions to Saddam Hussein Osama Bin Laden not that long ago?</p>
<p>Our country is broke, and our failed foreign policy is much to blame. Your emotionally charged argument is one that I would have wholeheartedly supported until I was awoken from my neocon slumber by Dr. Paul. Unfortunately, we can no longer affort to ignore the history of blowback and the reality of our fiscal insolvency.
<p align="right"><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=35493" , 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonnie Kristian</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/02/hawks-we-are-hawks-we-must-remain/comment-page-1/#comment-35388</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonnie Kristian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=516487#comment-35388</guid>
		<description>[...] worth a read: The following article is a response to Thomas Qualtere of The Heritage Foundation’s recent article “Hawks we are, hawks we must remain,” published on the Web site of The Daily [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] worth a read: The following article is a response to Thomas Qualtere of The Heritage Foundation’s recent article “Hawks we are, hawks we must remain,” published on the Web site of The Daily [...]
<p align="right"><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=35388" , 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Brown</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/02/hawks-we-are-hawks-we-must-remain/comment-page-1/#comment-34791</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 21:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=516487#comment-34791</guid>
		<description>Tom, we&#039;ve started a discussion on your article if you&#039;d care to join in: http://conservativecongress.com/forums/topic/foreign-policy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, we&#8217;ve started a discussion on your article if you&#8217;d care to join in: <a target="_blank" href="http://conservativecongress.com/forums/topic/foreign-policy"  rel="nofollow">http://conservativecongress.com/forums/topic/foreign-policy</a>
<p align="right"><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=34791" , 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: notforyou</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/02/hawks-we-are-hawks-we-must-remain/comment-page-1/#comment-34616</link>
		<dc:creator>notforyou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=516487#comment-34616</guid>
		<description>Sir-

I am a soldier. An infantryman, no less. I am also a member of the &quot;9/11 generation&quot; and saw and see it as my duty, when there is war, to fight. But your phrase, here- 

&quot;But for those of us who’ve chosen a vocation on the home front, our support for them and their mission must be unambiguous and unwavering. It is time for conservatism’s 9/11 generation to fully embrace and defend the role that history has bestowed upon us and wear our hawk feathers more proudly than ever.&quot;

Is more than a little irritating, as is your entire article. I fight not because I believe we must, or because the enemy &quot;hates our freedom,&quot; so on and so forth. I fight because, for the Republic to become what it was and ought to be, it must survive. I fight because I am willing, and able, and could not ask someone to go in my stead, as you seem so proudly able. Sir, if you believe so strongly in these wars, then your place is in the ranks. Any less is dereliction of duty. Wars do not fight themselves, and your ridiculous assertion that you merely chose &quot;a vocation on the home front&quot; are insulting. There is no home front in these wars. This is not World War Two. This is not a war to determine the future of the western world. This is an attempt to kill a tactic, to fight an idea. Are we helping the people of Iraq and Afghanistan? Yes. Should we be, at the expense of our own? I don&#039;t know, and without history shedding light on our present and recent past, I likely won&#039;t. But I digress.

You claim to be for liberty and small government, and yet your self-proclaimed idol did little to advance either, and did quite a bit to the detriment of both. I fight, sir, that liberty may be reborn, and live on. When we sacrifice our ideals on the altar of defending them, we have already lost.

A hawk you are, and nothing more. It is said that old men start wars, and young men fight them; you fly in the face of this maxim, a young men willing to start them without the decency to fight them. To those of you reading this who don&#039;t see &quot;national security&quot; as the one thing in this world worth having, I beg you. See the sacrifices made, and make them worthwhile. Fight for liberty, for the rights of the individual, fight for the Republic. Not on the battlefield- I, and those with me, are here to fight for the body of the United States. There is a far more important battle raging for its soul. Fight for the Country the founders envisioned. If we continue down the path we&#039;re on, we&#039;ll have power, and little else. Liberty is everything. As Patrick Henry is claimed to have said, I know not what course others may take- but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir-</p>
<p>I am a soldier. An infantryman, no less. I am also a member of the &#8220;9/11 generation&#8221; and saw and see it as my duty, when there is war, to fight. But your phrase, here- </p>
<p>&#8220;But for those of us who’ve chosen a vocation on the home front, our support for them and their mission must be unambiguous and unwavering. It is time for conservatism’s 9/11 generation to fully embrace and defend the role that history has bestowed upon us and wear our hawk feathers more proudly than ever.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is more than a little irritating, as is your entire article. I fight not because I believe we must, or because the enemy &#8220;hates our freedom,&#8221; so on and so forth. I fight because, for the Republic to become what it was and ought to be, it must survive. I fight because I am willing, and able, and could not ask someone to go in my stead, as you seem so proudly able. Sir, if you believe so strongly in these wars, then your place is in the ranks. Any less is dereliction of duty. Wars do not fight themselves, and your ridiculous assertion that you merely chose &#8220;a vocation on the home front&#8221; are insulting. There is no home front in these wars. This is not World War Two. This is not a war to determine the future of the western world. This is an attempt to kill a tactic, to fight an idea. Are we helping the people of Iraq and Afghanistan? Yes. Should we be, at the expense of our own? I don&#8217;t know, and without history shedding light on our present and recent past, I likely won&#8217;t. But I digress.</p>
<p>You claim to be for liberty and small government, and yet your self-proclaimed idol did little to advance either, and did quite a bit to the detriment of both. I fight, sir, that liberty may be reborn, and live on. When we sacrifice our ideals on the altar of defending them, we have already lost.</p>
<p>A hawk you are, and nothing more. It is said that old men start wars, and young men fight them; you fly in the face of this maxim, a young men willing to start them without the decency to fight them. To those of you reading this who don&#8217;t see &#8220;national security&#8221; as the one thing in this world worth having, I beg you. See the sacrifices made, and make them worthwhile. Fight for liberty, for the rights of the individual, fight for the Republic. Not on the battlefield- I, and those with me, are here to fight for the body of the United States. There is a far more important battle raging for its soul. Fight for the Country the founders envisioned. If we continue down the path we&#8217;re on, we&#8217;ll have power, and little else. Liberty is everything. As Patrick Henry is claimed to have said, I know not what course others may take- but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death.
<p align="right"><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=34616" , 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: engsem6</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/02/hawks-we-are-hawks-we-must-remain/comment-page-1/#comment-34454</link>
		<dc:creator>engsem6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 04:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=516487#comment-34454</guid>
		<description>A libertarian response to this article on behalf of Young Americans for Liberty - 
http://www.yaliberty.org/posts/eagles-we-were-eagles-we-will-be-again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A libertarian response to this article on behalf of Young Americans for Liberty &#8211;<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.yaliberty.org/posts/eagles-we-were-eagles-we-will-be-again"  rel="nofollow">http://www.yaliberty.org/posts/eagles-we-were-eagles-we-will-be-again</a>
<p align="right"><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=34454" , 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhys</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/02/hawks-we-are-hawks-we-must-remain/comment-page-1/#comment-34276</link>
		<dc:creator>rhys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 23:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=516487#comment-34276</guid>
		<description>Dude... we are not the 9/11 generation. That&#039;s sic that you would even think that. Get over your trauma. We have better, more positive things to associate our generation with. One for instance is the Ron Paul Revolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude&#8230; we are not the 9/11 generation. That&#8217;s sic that you would even think that. Get over your trauma. We have better, more positive things to associate our generation with. One for instance is the Ron Paul Revolution.
<p align="right"><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=34276" , 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rubirosa</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/02/hawks-we-are-hawks-we-must-remain/comment-page-1/#comment-33867</link>
		<dc:creator>rubirosa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=516487#comment-33867</guid>
		<description>Listen, cousin, in a debate, one needs to rebut the other person&#039;s main points if one wants to win the argument. If you&#039;re serious about urging conservatives to support an interventionist foreign policy abroad, you&#039;re going to have to: 1) explain away why the &#039;old right&#039; conservatives like Taft, Eisenhower etc. warned about the &#039;military industrial complex&#039; 2) explain how we&#039;re going to afford this perpetual war in the midst of the worst financial crisis in years 3) explain how intervening in the affairs of other countries/toppling governments actually &#039;doesn&#039;t&#039; come back to bite us 4) explain how a &#039;preemptive, undeclared&#039; war is constitutional and &#039;doesn&#039;t&#039; set the precedent for future abuses 5) explain why its okay for us to occupy them, but not okay for them to occupy us 6) explain how a &#039;war on terror&#039; can ever truly be won 7) explain why sanctions and tough talk &#039;doesn&#039;t&#039; actually make the Iranians &#039;more&#039; likely to pursue nuclear weapons 8) explain why the new front is Pakistan, when the war was only supposed to stay in Iraq 9) explain how focusing abroad &#039;doesn&#039;t&#039; make us more vulnerable at home (Colonel Hasan ring a bell?) 10) explain why Vietnam was a success 

The onus is on you, cousin, not me. History is riddled with examples of how war-mongering led to overextended nations and economic collapse. 

If you can do that, then I&#039;ll take you seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listen, cousin, in a debate, one needs to rebut the other person&#8217;s main points if one wants to win the argument. If you&#8217;re serious about urging conservatives to support an interventionist foreign policy abroad, you&#8217;re going to have to: 1) explain away why the &#8216;old right&#8217; conservatives like Taft, Eisenhower etc. warned about the &#8216;military industrial complex&#8217; 2) explain how we&#8217;re going to afford this perpetual war in the midst of the worst financial crisis in years 3) explain how intervening in the affairs of other countries/toppling governments actually &#8216;doesn&#8217;t&#8217; come back to bite us 4) explain how a &#8216;preemptive, undeclared&#8217; war is constitutional and &#8216;doesn&#8217;t&#8217; set the precedent for future abuses 5) explain why its okay for us to occupy them, but not okay for them to occupy us 6) explain how a &#8216;war on terror&#8217; can ever truly be won 7) explain why sanctions and tough talk &#8216;doesn&#8217;t&#8217; actually make the Iranians &#8216;more&#8217; likely to pursue nuclear weapons <img src='http://dailycaller.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> explain why the new front is Pakistan, when the war was only supposed to stay in Iraq 9) explain how focusing abroad &#8216;doesn&#8217;t&#8217; make us more vulnerable at home (Colonel Hasan ring a bell?) 10) explain why Vietnam was a success </p>
<p>The onus is on you, cousin, not me. History is riddled with examples of how war-mongering led to overextended nations and economic collapse. </p>
<p>If you can do that, then I&#8217;ll take you seriously.
<p align="right"><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=33867" , 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

