<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court protects gun rights, fails to restore greater freedom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/03/supreme-court-protects-gun-rights-fails-to-restore-greater-freedom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/03/supreme-court-protects-gun-rights-fails-to-restore-greater-freedom/</link>
	<description>The Daily Caller features breaking news, opinion, research, and entertainment 24 hours a day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 03:39:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: libertyatstake</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/03/supreme-court-protects-gun-rights-fails-to-restore-greater-freedom/comment-page-1/#comment-34528</link>
		<dc:creator>libertyatstake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=526917#comment-34528</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s draw a football analogy to the Constitution, shall we?  The Constitution is the call on the field.  Any decision going against the grain of the words in the Constitution is the replay.  The replay needs to show IRREFUTABLE evidence to overturn the call on the field. (Think of the Amendment process as a brilliant method for demonstrating IRREFUTABLE consensus)  

2nd Amendment states &quot;...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.&quot;

Since it&#039;s in there - it is up to the local jusrisdiction to make an IRREFUTABLE case why a citizen&#039;s 2nd Amendment rights can be eliminated in that jurisdiction.  btw -crime statistics make the opposite case.

http://libertyatstake.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s draw a football analogy to the Constitution, shall we?  The Constitution is the call on the field.  Any decision going against the grain of the words in the Constitution is the replay.  The replay needs to show IRREFUTABLE evidence to overturn the call on the field. (Think of the Amendment process as a brilliant method for demonstrating IRREFUTABLE consensus)  </p>
<p>2nd Amendment states &#8220;&#8230;the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.&#8221;</p>
<p>Since it&#8217;s in there &#8211; it is up to the local jusrisdiction to make an IRREFUTABLE case why a citizen&#8217;s 2nd Amendment rights can be eliminated in that jurisdiction.  btw -crime statistics make the opposite case.</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://libertyatstake.blogspot.com/"   rel="nofollow">http://libertyatstake.blogspot.com/</a>
<p align="right"><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=34528" , 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

