Opinion

Scandal watch: Massa as the new Foley? An insider’s view

Photo of Mr. GOP
Mr. GOP
Contributor

Eight days ago the political world took notice to a freshman congressman from the Finger Lakes region in New York. It was not due to his political savvy, his fundraising skills or any possible legislation. No, word of a scandal came out and now voters across the country know who Eric Massa is, and as each day goes by, we learn more and more about what he has done.

Sounds eerily familiar to 2006, when, as a House GOP leadership staffer, I watched the Mark Foley scandal unfold from the inside.

Leading up to Sept. 29, 2006, then-Rep. Mark Foley was a rank-and-file GOP Member. Known on the Hill for being friendly, easy to work with and someone who towed the party line on most legislation.

Rumors did exist on Rep. Foley’s sexuality, but they were nothing anyone feared that could hurt the party and were subsequently not a factor in his day-to-day interactions with his colleagues. Overall, most Americans had no clue who he was, much like Rep. Eric Massa.

In the days leading up to Foley’s resignation, an ABC News story detailing his elicit chats with former Hill pages, and the beginning of the end for Republicans, there were few but very quiet whispers. High-level staff was notified that Brian Ross was working on a story, that it involved Foley and that it might be big.

The news was kept in a tight-knit group of confidants, which waited to see what would come out of all this. I would assume the same situation has recently unfolded within the offices of Hoyer, Clyburn and Pelosi.

The mistake that was made was that leadership underestimated the situation and in doing so failed to take action to correct it and therefore felt trapped under the weight of the scandal. The day the scandal itself broke, House Republicans were forced into a firing squad, each taking aim at the other over who had dropped the ball. Each day, the story grew worse; more chats, more pages, more scandal and less transparency. This was a gift to the Democrats who had championed the right as a “Culture of Corruption.” Just when then needed it, Mark Foley proved to be the final nail in the coffin for the Republican Majority.

Now, having seen that situation firsthand, I look toward the Democratic leadership and how they are handling the Massa scandal. To say that this is being swept under the carpet or is not on their minds is ridiculous. The media outlets may try to limit coverage, but make no mistake; this is a liability that will remain the elephant in the room for sometime to come.

However, the way the Massa scandal is different from the Foley scandal is two points that should scare the hell out of the Democrats:

  1. The GOP had to deal with this story for roughly 30 days. After the election, no one really cared about Mark Foley, the damage was done and the House shifted power. Today, Speaker Nancy Pelosi has 235 days to try and save her job. That is a very long time for more shoes to drop, more allegations to surface and more questions that will need to be answered. And every time this comes back into the media, it will not go quietly, it will sit and fester causing more political damage to her party.
  2. The second point is what will cause the most pain for the Democrats. Eric Massa is talking to the press. If there was one good thing that Mark Foley did after resigning it was that he went into hiding. This is not the case for Massa. He has already proved he is willing to speak on the record, to sit in on hour-long shows and drop random facts about his case. The more allegations that arise, the more he will feel the need to be heard, each time bringing this case to the surface. In fact, it is only a matter of time until he publishes a book, appears on late night TV and maybe signs up for a reality show.

The Democrats should be thankful that there is a looming health care vote, without that the story would continue to be, “What did you know about Eric Massa and when did you know it?” This is a party that is already feeling the pressures of November. More savvy Members have decided to announce their retirement, while many continue to give un-sourced quotes regarding their dim hopes for saving a majority. And while some may take to the floor and rant about media coverage of Eric Massa, his is a story that sells.

What the Democratic House Leadership needs to understand is that the GOP Members (and their staff) who are still in office today remember how Democrats (and their staff) reacted to and most likely pushed the Foley story to reporters. They remember the damage a scandal like this can create and while there is blood in the water, there is no chance that this will come idling to a halt.

Mr. GOP, a former House leadership staffer, is writing under an assumed name to protect his identity.

  • Pingback: Who’s leaking the incomplete Eric Massa ethics probe to the media? - Michael Roston - Newsbroke - True/Slant

  • mordechai

    Pelosi hasn’t done anything about this scandle because the concept of personal responsability is against Democratic ideology.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Grateful-Al/100000291385188 Grateful Al

    Who REALLY drove the Foley story?

    It was a gay activist that still today threatens to out those in government that are gay and vote against the homosexual agenda, with Foley it was the Marriage Protection Act or something like it at the time.

    Mike Rogers is proud of what he does at his corner of the the cyber-cesspool. He was proud of taking out Foley. The page contacts were later revealed to be a confessed set-up by a couple of pages that basically lured Foey into the IM’s then were passed to a cohort of the gay activist. Can you say “extortion”? Also, he was responsible for passing the IM’s to CREW, a George Soros funded office of two left-wing loony women who requested an FBI investigation be initiated when the IM’s were received on July 21, 2006. ABC received the IM copies and ran with the story 1 month later, Foley resigned- a former page came forward and stated he had sex with Foley, when he was 21. No charges from the FBI were ever lodged. Rogers’ Timeline is here about Foley: http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/30/foley-coverup-timeline/

    Rogers has no bad feelings for Massa because, “He wasn’t anti-gay so I really don’t have much to say about him other than how sad it is,” posted on his blog Sat 3-13- he evidently is overseas and still caught wind of the story.

    This creep also has for years promised to “out” Charlie Crist, “Florida’s gay Governor”, Andre Bauer who is the Lt. Gov in SC, and believes N.Y Mayor Ed Koch, Foley’s former aide, Kirk Fordham who now works in Fl Senator Martinez’s office are all gay yet talk and vote “pro-family”. Rogers has for years claimed he says 33 closet gays in leadership positions that affect gay issues – 3 are democrats, and so on.

    Massa gets it on in his free time having ‘tickle fights’ with his younger aides in their shared apartment? So what.

    He scares a staff member and the Dems don’t react to a harassment complaint? Was it because they needed every vote they could get because of the close call – even though he voted against it because he wants ‘single payer’ – I’m sure they believed he could be swung with the pitch this is the starting point, so vote with us. Good enough reason to keep it quiet as long as possible, ya think?

  • elyriaohio

    YES! We should investigate ALL reports of Navy guys getting drunk & crude!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-Roston/690635429 Michael Roston

    This article is riddled with falsehoods and I’m disappointed that The Daily Caller would publish this unedited spinning of a terrible GOP scandal written by someone who doesn’t even have the guts to reveal himself. Is Mr. GOP still working for the Republican Party or related political machinery?

    For instance, the timid Mr. GOP writes that “Rumors did exist on Rep. Foley’s sexuality, but they were nothing anyone feared that could hurt the party and were subsequently not a factor in his day-to-day interactions with his colleagues.”

    This isn’t true at all. Rumors existed going back to the 90s about Mr. Foley’s sexuality. But the staff of Speaker Hastert received warning about Mr. Foley’s conduct with regard to Congressional pages as far back as 2002 or 2003 according to a New York Times story of December 9, 2006 on the conclusion of the House Ethics probe. The House Ethics Committee concluded that the Republican leadership was well aware that Foley could blow up before ABC News came forward, but they sat on it because they feared the political implications of confronting it.

    What’s worse, the timid Mr. GOP’s highly convenient analysis leaves out that Majority Leader Hoyer just voted in favor of asking the Ethics Committee to investigate his own office. When then-Majority Leader Boehner was confronted with the Foley issue, he at first claimed he had approached Speaker Hastert on the subject, but when Speaker Hastert denied that was true, Boehner could not say he was certain he had gone to the Speaker’s office.

    There is a very deliberate effort on the part of Republican Party machinery to hang Eric Massa around the Democratic leadership’s neck prior to the conclusion of the Ethics Committee’s investigation. I’m sad to see the Daily Caller collaborating in it.