Feature:Opinion

The non-review: Romney’s ‘No Apologies’

Photo of Former Sen. Jim Talent
Former Sen. Jim Talent
Contributor
  • See All Articles
  • Subscribe to RSS
  • Bio

      Former Sen. Jim Talent

      is an American politician and former Senator from Missouri. He is a Republican and resided in the St. Louis area while serving in elected office. After serving for eight years in the U.S. House of Representatives and then working as a lobbyist, he was elected to the U.S. Senate in 2002, narrowly defeating Democrat Jean Carnahan in a special election to complete the term to which Carnahan's husband, Mel, had been elected posthumously in 2000. In the November Democratic wave of 2006, Talent lost his re-election bid to Claire McCaskill. Talent served as a senior advisor to Mitt Romney's 2008 presidential campaign.

This column is not a review of Mitt Romney’s new book, “No Apology: the Case for American Greatness.” I wanted to write a review, but decided in all candor that I shouldn’t. I chaired Gov. Romney’s Domestic Policy Task Force during the ’08 campaign and am still a very strong supporter; more to the point, I read and commented on the initial drafts of the book when Mr. Romney was writing it. I would be seen, quite accurately, as too closely involved with both the book and the author to write anything approaching an impartial review.

But, having disclosed my bias, I can offer an observation about “No Apology” that may be useful to its readers.

Gov. Romney wrote the book himself. To be sure, he solicited suggestions, advice, and edits from a range of advisors and friends (“No Apology” has two pages of acknowledgments) but the book says what Romney wanted to say in the way he wanted to say it.

More than most politicians, Mitt Romney cares about ideas and how they are communicated. He’s also an intellectually and emotionally secure human being. He enjoys debate, welcomes challenges to his positions, and is constantly reaching out for new information. If Governor Romney should reach the White House, no one in his Administration will be discouraged from telling the President to his face that he is wrong. But anyone who does that had better be thoroughly prepared, because Romney has thought about what he believes, and he understands a broad range of issues at a depth that is unusual for someone who has spent most of his life outside of politics.

In short, “No Apology” is Mitt Romney’s personal statement. The book is intended to, and does, tell us a lot about the man who wrote it, and not just about his ideas. Over the last two years, a number of people have told me that they liked Gov. Romney as a candidate but wondered what really makes him tick. “No Apology” is the answer. Anyone who reads the book—whether they agree or disagree with its positions—will see the motives that make Romney “tick”: the entrepreneur’s desire to fix what is broken, the lawyer’s passion for organizing information and arguing ideas, the proud husband’s devotion to wife and family, and the unshakeable American exceptionalism of a man whose father taught him to love his country.

During the presidential campaign, Gov. Romney often said that America was reaching a crossroads, or an “inflection point” as he calls it. He foresaw the period of national trial that we have now entered. Romney believes that in certain respects America took it too easy for too long, and that to recover our national fortunes we have to recommit ourselves to national greatness.

  • Pingback: Romney calls for repeal of health bill « Internet Buzz

  • Pingback: Religion is NOT a Cause-and-Effect Thing, That and the News | Article VI Blog | John Schroeder

  • theneighborhoodguy

    He may have to do until Ryan or someone like Ryan gets some seasoning…the young guys are proving to be smaller government guys…the old guard in DC have lost their way…we have 18 months to find the right guy(s)…that’s the good news.

  • logic

    Romney is good for an occasional nod to conservatism but he has defended his state’s failure of a health policy and adheres to neoconservative ideas about foreign policy. He believes too strongly in government, period. While it may be better than what we are stuck with now, or better than John McCain, he does not represent what true, small government, libertarian-leaning conservatives are after.