The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller

Dems unveil plan for immigration reform that GOP calls ‘cynical’ ploy

The GOP says immigration reform won’t happen this year, but New York Democrat Chuck Schumer and other Democrats unveiled the framework for comprehensive immigration legislation they say can be passed with Republican help.

Schumer, who took the lead on drafting the framework for the type immigration reform Democrats want, took issue during a Thursday press conference off the Senate floor with the “pundits, columnists, reporters” who have said passage of reform is impossible.

“I completely disagree,” Schumer said of the media prognosis. The senator, blasting the recent state law that’s tough on illegal immigrants in Arizona, called on Republicans to work on getting a bill passed, arguing “the urgency for immigration reform could not be overstated.”

Schumer. along with Majority Leader Harry Reid, Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin, Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California and Sen. Bob Menendez of New Jersey, unveiled a Democratic draft of ideas Thursday afternoon for a comprehensive reform bill that includes first controlling the border and then establishing a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants already in the country.

Republicans have accused Democrats of pushing immigration reform ahead of November’s midterm elections to wedge a gap between the party and Hispanics, knowing any bill is unlikely to pass and failure can be blamed on the Republicans. Earlier on Thursday, Republican House leader John Boehner flatly said a comprehensive immigration will not go far this year, as the political environment will be too charged during election season.

“There’s not a chance immigration reform is going to pass through Congress,” Boehner said, pointing out that President Obama has made similar statements showing he’s doubtful a bipartisan bill could pass this year.

Obama on Thursday appeared to be backing away, saying in a statement “that the proposal outlined today in the Senate is a very important step in the process of fixing our nation’s broken immigration system.”

Boehner called Democrats moving to work on immigration reform “nothing more than a cynical ploy to try to engage voters, some segment of voters, to show up in this November’s election.”

Reid’s spokesman Rodell Mollineau, in an e-mail to The Daily Caller, disputed the notion that the proposal is about alienating Republicans from Hispanic voters. “The GOP is doing a good enough job of that without Democratic help,” he said. “Congressman Boehner and others should take a hard look at what is being proposed before attacking.”

Yet a Democratic House committee staffer, according to TPM’s Christina Bellantoni, acknowledged the election year political motivations for introducing an immigration bill, saying Republicans who block the bill “will forever cement themselves as rural, white angry party.”

The staffer said “Reid obviously needs it to invigorate his base … and one way to do that is to get an immigration bill moving.”

New Jersey’s Menendez, during the conference, struck an emotional tone, saying he hopes Americans will be honest with themselves over the role of immigrants in society. “This morning if you had breakfast — and you had fruit for breakfast — it was probably picked by the bent back of an immigrant worker. If you had chicken for dinner, it was probably plucked by a pair of hands of an immigrant worker.”

  • stevecan

    “It’s something new for me to have my citizenship challenged by the motor vehicle department, to find the docs, to prove my citizenship.”

    You won’t have to worry about that with your new National “Worker” ID card as suggested by Dims in Washington.

    SNIP … Democratic leaders have proposed requiring every worker in the nation to carry a national identification card with biometric information, such as a fingerprint, within the next six years, according to a draft of the measure.

    Source: http://dailycaller.com/2010/04/30/dems-spark-alarm-with-call-for-national-id-card/comment-page-2/#comment-108476

  • emem

    I have listened to Congressman comments both for and against the AZ law.

    Anyone who has moved interstate in the last decade may have had a similar experience to mine. Despite having a valid drivers license from my previous state, I was required to provide an original birth certificate to get a license in my new state of residence (a democratic strong hold) and provide proof of residence using home purchase documents. Is this fair?

    This country has huge communities of immigrants, Arab, Asian, Eastern Europeans, etc. and none of those listed have received special accomodations
    at taxpayer expense.

    I would suggest that those who support the law, remember a kinder nation for it’s citizens and those that do not have no idea of what has been lost.

    • gbenton

      You make a very important point. Why all the concern for hispanic illegal immigrants? We should welcome legal immigrants who come through the front door and then celebrate them as Americans in the melting pot (no politics of identity!).

      Illegals from any country should be treated the same… tossed out and shown where to apply for the front door.

    • Confedd

      “I would suggest that those who support the law, remember a kinder nation for it’s citizens and those that do not have no idea of what has been lost.”

      You must be talking about when people came here legally, learned the language, and assimilated to this country.

      • emem

        In part – yes. Also, that all states are attempting to deal with the same problem as AZ. I have moved a few times before and states used to recognize the documents of each other and apparently they no longer can or are willing to. It’s something new for me to have my citizenship challenged by the motor vehicle department, to find the docs, to prove my citizenship.

        I have no problem with legal immigration, but it seems this situation has taken on a life all it’s own.

        • rick013

          There is a reason for proof of citizenship in some states since a drivers license can be used as a means of identification for voting. It attempts to keep down the fraud vote.