The Daily Caller Social Experience

Let your friends help you discover the best news, features and videos on TheDC. Publish what you read and maintain full control.


 

Is the media right on the Joint Strike Fighter?

When the GAO report is mentioned in media coverage, reporters are tending to quote other people (on the GE/Rolls-Royce side) who are referencing the report. Why on earth aren’t reporters reading the report and quoting directly from it themselves? They have an unbiased, authoritative source at their fingertips! Is this lazy journalism? Or a sign that the PR and lobbying campaigns funded by Pratt and Whitney, GE and Rolls Royce are much more interesting to reporters than facts and studies?

As is far too common in public-policy journalism, the coverage in this case seems to focus less on the engine issue and more on the conflict between the warring parties. A piece on the ABC News website (“The Blotter”), for example, recently read: “ABC News chief investigative reporter Brian Ross will have more on the allegations of wasteful spending tonight in a report on World News with Diane Sawyer.”

Coverage of allegations, of a fight, of name-calling, is more salacious than coverage of a boring old GAO report, right? But is it responsible journalism?

Facts may not be as interesting as name-calling, but they are what the public deserves to know.


Ms. Card is a freelance writer living in Alexandria, Va. She is a former cabinet-level speechwriter and has served in the U.S. departments of Labor, Treasury and Justice.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

STAY CONNECTED TO