After signing onto financial reform, Scott Brown slams campaign spending ‘Disclose Act’

A Democratic push to limit campaign spending in the wake of the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision is under siege in the Senate.

The bill’s top proponent in the Senate, New York Democrat Sen. Chuck Schumer, has been targeting Massachusetts Republican Sen. Scott Brown to obtain enough votes to pass the bill, key lobbyists on both sides of the issue say.

But Brown provided Schumer a rude awakening in an interview with The Daily Caller on Tuesday.

“He should look somewhere else,” Brown said, “It’s a bad bill. It’s being used strictly for tactical advantage for the majority party. It’s inappropriate.”

A key concern of Brown’s, and other Republicans, is that the bill’s implementation – 30 days after enactment during the height of campaign season – would cause mass confusion as to how to implement the law’s new standards.

Brown, the lobbyists say, has sought to push the bill’s implementation into the next election cycle, avoiding the uncertainty that would come with rushing to install the new rules now.

“If they want to do something next cycle, that’s great. But to use it for a tactical advantage less than 112 days from the election is inappropriate,” Brown told TheDC.

The Federal Election Commission, which would implement the law, declined to comment on how difficult it would be to implement it. “It’s safe to say the agency is studying the bill,” spokeswoman Judith Ingram said.

However, Ingram did forward a Congressional Research Service (CRS) report voicing concerns about the bill’s rapid implementation timeline.

“It is unlikely the commission could fully implement the act before the 2010 November general elections,” the CRS report says.

Proponents of the law, including two former FEC commissioners, Democrat Scott Thomas and Republican Trevor Potter, say even a deadlocked FEC will be able to facilitate compliance with the bill. In a June 22 op-ed, Thomas and Potter said the FEC could provide reporting forms – allowing organizations some means of complying with the new disclosure requirements – in only two weeks.

Meanwhile, the Disclose Act is also under fire following what proponents admit was a public relations disaster when House Democrats finagled passage in the lower chamber in part by granting loopholes for some of Washington’s most powerful special interest groups, including the National Rifle Association and the Sierra Club.

“My problem is, either everybody is included, or I won’t vote for it. The NRA and any other group that’s exempted – there should be no exemptions,” Sen. Dianne Feinstein, California Democrat, told TheDC Tuesday.

Key stakeholders said Feinstein was pushing for a hearing in the Senate rules committee, of which she is a member – as opposed to a plan of Schumer’s and Majority Leader Harry Reid’s to bring the bill straight to the Senate floor. Not true, she said. “No. I would be delighted if there were a hearing. I’m happy to push for it, but I haven’t been.”

If they were to bring it to the Senate floor, Schumer and Reid would first need to garner the necessary support, including placating Democratic discontents like Feinstein finding at least one Republican to break an expected filibuster.

Besides Brown, Maine Republicans Sens. Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe are also thought to be potential supporters. Julia Lawless, a spokeswoman for Snowe, offered a more open-ended take on her boss’s position on the bill than Brown. “We are currently reviewing the legislation,” she said.

  • EyeoftheEAGLE

    This man is NO conserative in my eyes, but willing to compromize across the isle. The two witches I would like to see retire are from Maine, they are the real RINOS in the senate, morons at times.

  • woola

    I think if Sen. Brown doesn’t force this bill to address the culprits, Fannie & Freddie and stop protecting the unions, he won’t be addressed as “Sen.” Brown after 2012.
    This bill is bad and should not be voted on until after Jan. 2011.
    Pat, Boston, MA

  • jeffersonian

    Good for him! ‘disclose’ is a bad bill, cleverly named to imply something it is not…..Now, if Brown would only show the same acumen on the ‘finance reform’ bs that he is supporting….grow a set downstairs, Mr. Brown.

  • Amazingoly

    Most think Scott Brown needs to distance himself from John Kerry if he is to keep his “open mind” in making key decisions.

  • Pingback: After signing onto financial reform, Scott Brown slams campaign spending ‘Disclose Act’ @ 2012 Presidential Election Year

  • american10

    Brown is biting the hand that gave him power, but we all knew he would!! He was just the lesser of two evils at the time!!! This next election will be his time to go!!!!

  • Pingback: Political Activity Law - Political Law - Election Law · Brown slams DISCLOSE