Politics

War between Chamber of Commerce and White House spills into open

Photo of Jon Ward
Jon Ward
Contributor
  • See All Articles
  • Send Email
  • Subscribe to RSS
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Bio

      Jon Ward

      Jon Ward covers the White House and national politics for The Daily Caller. He covered the last two years of George W. Bush's presidency and the first year of Barack Obama's presidency for The Washington Times. Prior to moving to national politics, Jon worked for the Times' city desk and bureaus in Virginia and Maryland, covering local news and politics, including the D.C. sniper shootings and subsequent trial, before moving to state politics in Maryland. He and his wife have two children and live on Capitol Hill. || <a href="mailto:jw@dailycaller.com">Email Jon</a>

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce on Wednesday rejected a request from top White House adviser Valerie Jarrett to speak at a jobs summit hosted by the business group, the latest escalation in an ongoing war between the two camps.

“We would have loved to have gone and participated. We weren’t invited. In fact we were told not to come,” Jarrett said, during an interview on Bloomberg Television.

Chamber officials said Jarrett requested that she be allowed to address their gathering, a several-hour long “Jobs for America Summit,” on Wednesday morning, a few hours before the event began. They said the program was too full to fit her in.

At the summit, Chamber President and CEO Tom Donohue railed against President Obama’s economic policies.

“Our current economic direction is not working,” Donohue said.

Donahue said that Obama’s health care and financial regulation initiatives are onerous to the point that the Americans will lose freedoms unique to the country.

“Taken collectively, the regulatory activity now underway is so overwhelming and beyond anything we have ever seen, that we risk moving this country away from a government of the people to a government of regulators,” Donohue said.

Donohue balanced this by denying that Obama is anti-business, continuing the Chamber’s habit of avoiding public statements that are openly hostile to the White House.

“I don’t believe the administration is anti-business. I believe the administration has a series of views of what they ought to do about social programs such as health care and environment issues,” he said.

“A lot of people want to start a fight between the administration and the business community. We’re not going there,” Donohue said.

But the move to deny Jarrett a speaking spot at their event pulled back the curtain on the relationship between the Chamber, which has traditionally been one of Washington’s most powerful interest groups, and the Obama White House, which has made a point of trying to weaken the Chamber.

Earlier in the day, Jarrett and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel sent a letter to the Chamber expressing disappointment at complaints registered publicly against the president by those in the business community.

“The stakes are far too high for us to be working against one another,” the letter from Jarrett and Emanuel said. “That is why we were surprised and disappointed at the rhetoric we have heard from some in the business community.”

The letter did not specify which comments they were referring to, but top business leaders have spoken out with increasing frequency in recent weeks to criticize Obama’s policies, saying he has created crippling uncertainty for business because of the massive regulatory regimes being constructed by the health care and financial regulation legislation.

Though corporate profits are up, the private sector is sitting on almost $2 trillion in cash reserves instead of expanding operations and hiring new workers.

Donohue urged the White House to extend the Bush tax cuts, reduce the corporate tax rate, do more to assure investors that the government can get its deficit and debt under control, submit free trade agreements with Colombia, Panama and South Korea to Congress as soon as possible, and “remove … regulatory, legal, and financial roadblocks” for business.

  • rick013

    What is interesting to note is that the US Chamber of Commerce is staunchly supportive of amnesty and more work visa programs. Yet, they are feuding with the very administration that can grant their wishes. I find this odd to say the least.

    With regards to Jarrett, she was just a slum-lord millionaire who made her money off the backs of the poor and the taxpayer. Just part of the profile of Chicago styled politics.

    • akbarzeb

      Visas and immigration reform are a drop in the bucket compared to the cost of conforming to ever growing list of regulations.

  • mojo

    “Don’t you have a slum somewhere you should be lording it over?”

  • ernielane

    Why would anyone think Valerie Jarrett could have anything to offer (tell these guys)?

  • thehawk1619

    Jarrett is a neophyte, who would be out of her league addressing any room of people, especially bidness men and women. Her claim to fame is she had the soles of her feet pointing towards the ceiling for Barack.

  • Pingback: Rebellion News

  • truebearing

    Morning, noon, and night, year after year, the left has schemed and plotted and manipulated and infiltrated so that someday they would have all of the power. They worship Political Power. It is the God of the Left. They will do anything for it, but in their rapacious, headlong lunge for power there is one thing they have missed, badly: their inability to govern once in power.

    They have spent all of their collective lives lying, cheating, sneaking, dissembling, smearing, etc., but never actually building anything but political conspiracy. Political conspiracy is their only talent. They know nothing whatsoever about business, or how wealth is created. And so it is for every leftist regime in history, and forever.

  • recidivist

    Listening to Ms Jarrett in that interview, is it any wonder how clueless this administration is about business? Any kind of business? The uncertainties of the healthcare laws, Biden promoting the failed stimulus bill. Sheeesh.

  • awlhattinokaddle

    Eighteen Months In ! And the whole thing is swirling the drain.

    YEEEEEEEE HAAAAAAAAW !!!!!

  • jomo2009

    Jarrett stood to make a killing if the US was successful in bidding for 2016 Olympics. She had substantial holdings in slum property that would have been purchased and razed in order to build the Olympic village and other venues for the games. Maybe that was going to be her advice to the Chamber of Commerce. The art of the (inside) deal.

    • anniebanannie

      Thank you for bringing that up. I was called a liar on here for saying that is what she was up to.

      • des1

        I’m sorry I didn’t see that. I’d have pointed out the Boston Globe article that listed her and Tony Rezko as two of the biggest beneficiaries of slum housing in a bill pushed by Captain Transparency. The housing was eventually closed down because of inhuman living conditions, but Jarett and Rezko walked away with millions and no questions asked.

        • anniebanannie

          I’m sorry you missed it too, des. It was one heck of a “motherfarker” fight, IYKWIMAITYD