The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller

Abortion foes win a round in health overhaul

WASHINGTON (AP) — Abortion foes have won a round in the first test of how President Barack Obama’s health care law will be applied to the politically charged issue.

Meanwhile, traditional allies of the administration are grumbling about a decision to ban most abortion coverage in insurance pools for those unable to purchase health care on their own.

The Catholic bishops “welcome this new policy,” said Cardinal Daniel DiNardo, although he added the organization remains concerned that other parts of the health care overhaul will promote abortion.

NARAL Pro-Choice America called it “inexplicable and wrongheaded.”

Abortion politics flared up after at least one state — New Mexico — initially decided to allow coverage of elective abortion in a new federally funded program to provide coverage for high-risk uninsured people turned away by private carriers.

Abortion opponents also raised questions about Pennsylvania and Maryland, but officials in those states denied that their plans would have covered abortions.

Trying to head off more problems, the Health and Human Services Department announced last week the program will not cover abortions except in cases of rape, incest or when the mother’s life is in danger — exceptions traditionally allowed under federal law.

That’s a more restrictive policy than will be generally applied under Obama’s new health care law.

Starting in 2014, the overhaul will allow federally subsidized health insurance plans to cover abortions, but only if policyholders pay for coverage separately and the money is segregated from government funds.

The current program for the high-risk uninsured was also authorized by the health care law, as temporary help for the most vulnerable until the big coverage expansion in 2014. But Congress didn’t spell out how to deal with abortion.

Abortion rights supporters say the Obama administration’s restrictions go too far.

“We didn’t expect that women would be treated differently here with regard to the high-risk insurance pool,” said NARAL president Nancy Keenan. “This is inexplicable and wrongheaded to us, and it puts women’s lives in jeopardy.”

“I think the administration got it wrong,” said Jessica Arons, director of women’s health at the Center for American Progress, a liberal public policy institute. “They have imposed a ban on abortion coverage in the high-risk pools and nothing in the law requires that action.”

The turnabout comes amid growing recognition among Democrats that the nation’s unsettled political climate could cost them control of the House in the fall elections. The health care law remains a powerful motivator for opponents of Obama’s policies, and no issue stirs deeper passions than abortion.

After abortion foes raised questions about the program for the uninsured, leading congressional Republicans jumped on the attack. They accused Obama of steering millions in federal funds to pay for abortions, breaking a promise he made when he signed an executive order that reaffirmed long-standing federal restrictions.

Anti-abortion Democrats in Congress — whose votes provided the margin for passage of the health care law — scrambled to respond.

Several of them said the administration’s ultimate decision proves that Obama’s executive order has teeth. The president signed the order as part of a negotiation to get anti-abortion Democrats in the House to vote for the overhaul bill, and HHS invoked it in laying out the restrictions.

“This is the first test, and it will show that there is no federal funding going to pay for abortion,” said Rep. Kathy Dahlkemper, D-Pa., a first-term lawmaker seeking re-election from a Republican-leaning district.

Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., a leader of anti-abortion Democrats in the House, said the administration’s action should ease fears that the health care law would open a spigot of federal funding for abortion.

“New Mexico is an example of where the executive order actually worked,” Stupak said, referring to that state’s reversal on allowing coverage of elective abortion. “They have made it very clear abortions are not going to be covered.”

The Preexisting Condition Insurance Plan, launched earlier this month, will provide coverage to uninsured people turned down by private carriers because of a medical problem. Premiums vary by state but are roughly comparable to those paid by healthy people. Applications are being taken and coverage is expected to begin Aug. 1.

Douglas Johnson, legislative director for National Right to Life, an anti-abortion group, acknowledged that his side had won a round.

“If they now do what they say they are going to do, that would be good,” Johnson said of the Obama administration. “But in our view they are doing it because the spotlight has been put on them and we blew the whistle.”

___

Online:

Health and Human Services statement

http://tinyurl.com/249qx5k

  • Mainstream America

    I am a conservative and as such I think the government should be paying for abortions for anyone who wants one but can’t afford one.

    Why? Because it saves tax payers money!

    Nip those welfare leaches in the bud. Save the state from wasting money on paying for schooling those unwanted mistakes. It is the worst sort of conservative who wants to fuel this sort of wedge issue without running the numbers. Abortions save tax dollars! Zygotes aren’t humans, a fetus isn’t a child. Why are we allowing the religious institutions to muddy our politics and medical decisions like this? It’s unAmerican this sort of faith based policy. And by the way, since the church believes that all aborted souls go straight to heaven — a 1 to 1 success rate! — it’s in the soul’s best interest to be aborted.

    • theprofessor

      You’re a liar and a troll.

  • shepmoors

    Only with due diligence will this “executive order” stick. If they can find a way to cover abortion with federal funds in a stealth manner, I believe they will.