The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller

Senate committee to hold hearing on gun regulation reform

The Senate Judiciary Committee announced it will hold a hearing next week to discuss a bipartisan bill intended to update federal gun measures and reform what critics say is an outdated firearm licensing process.

The bill, which was proposed more than a year ago, specifically addresses inefficiencies and problems within the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives by eliminating certain restrictions on gun ownership and modernizing operations within the bureau. Committee Chairman and bill co-sponsor Patrick Leahy, Vermont Democrat, called for the hearing, and will announce the list of witnesses later this week.

Despite the general thrust of the bill in favor of gun owners and manufacturers, some conservative bloggers seized on the announcement, supposedly assuming that the hearing was some kind of plot to restrict gun rights before the end of Congress’ lame-duck session.

Under the headline, “It Begins… Democrats Schedule Senate Meeting to Regulate Gun Sales,” blogger Jim Hoft said that the Senate was meeting to “regulate gun sales”, adding, “now they’re coming for your guns.” Later on Wednesday, The Drudge Report posted a link to the committee’s announcement at the top of his website, while providing no explanation of what the hearing was about. (Update: Meanwhile, HotAir.com writer Ed Morrissey explained the issue and urged calm after receiving multiple emails from concerned readers.)

According to the bill’s summary, the measure:

-Permits an owner of a firearms business whose license is expired, surrendered, or revoked 60 days to liquidate inventory.

-Allows purchasers of existing firearms businesses the right to cure firearms violations attributable to such businesses.

-Allows the transfer, possession, and importation of machineguns for industry testing, training, and film production.

-Eliminates the requirement of written permission for the use of a handgun for lawful purposes by a minor (under age 18) where a parent or legal guardian is present at all times during such use.

-Prohibits the Attorney General from electronically retrieving inactive firearms licensee information by name or personal identification code.

-Directs the Attorney General to authorize the importation of all frames or receivers of rifles, or barrels for firearms other than handguns, if the importation is for repair or replacement purposes.

The bill has received strong support from the National Rifle Association.

“The bills would roll back unnecessary restrictions, correct errors, and codify longstanding congressional policies in the firearms arena. These bipartisan bills are a vital step to modernize and improve BATFE operations,” a 2009 NRA release read, urging members to call their congressman and vote for the bill. Another NRA release sent out when the bill was introduced in May 2009 said the bill “will make it easier for lawful gun owners and dealers to comply with federal law and regulations, while ensuring that those who break the law are punished accordingly.”

The Brady Campaign, an organization that argues for restrictions on gun ownership, has opposed the measure since it was announced last year. In a July 2009 release, the Brady Campaign argued that the measure “would severely undermine federal gun law enforcement and protect corrupt gun dealers” and “make it virtually impossible for ATF to revoke the licenses of gun dealers who violate federal law.”

  • Pingback: Alphecca » Senate Hearing on Gun Regulation

  • Swen

    Remember that any new law will require the writing of implementing regulations — the details that so often contain the devil. The BATFE will be writing those regulations. Worried now?

  • BMF

    You know, this country wouldn’t be in such a mess if Congress spent most of its time eliminating bad legislation, improving existing rules and regulations, and making life easier on us all.

    Unfortunately, that’s not the Democrat’s MO and so I’m puzzled by these hearings. They seem completely out of character for Democrats in general and Senator Leahy in particular. But I’ll reserve any criticism until I see what the results are.

  • diamndgirl

    NRA also supported the dems Disclose Act and candidates that have a ‘D’ after their name, if Leaky Leahy is holding this, I do NOT trust…period.

    Be Aware is all I can say~

  • J Baustian

    Quote: When Pat Leahy supports anything that’s supposed to be on our side, you’d better keep your hand close to your revolver.”

    Indeed. On the other hand, there are benefits to having such a hearing so close to the election. It will remind us once again of how much we hate Patrick Leahy’s guts.

    I hope the hearing is widely publicized and discussed.

  • johno413

    In this hyper-partisan times one need only utter keywords like gun, abortion, tax, etc., to release the barking hounds of pundits, not to mention the elected class. It’s quite possible that with this milquetoast sounding bill (relative to what could be addressed), the Dems simply want to look middle of the road to some, and to find opportunities of extreme behavior for their political ads.

    There is no reason to expect that any activity right now is more than election fodder and therefor not a run at true or meaningful legislation. Sure, something good may be in the bill, per the NRA, but does it accomplish something really meaningful with respect to what might be or should be accomplished? Or is just dressing, meant to provide election worthy sound bites and video clips?

  • tinteardrop

    “This is obviously politically motivated. When Pat Leahy supports anything that’s supposed to be on our side, you’d better keep your hand close to your revolver.”

    The language is structured to sound reasonable and needed. But the politics of the timing can’t be dismissed. These politicians need to be taught through the voting process that we’re tired of their intrusion into this part of our business. We are of the belief that the government really has no business knowing “where the guns are”.

    • Momma M

      Right on target!