The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller

Palin’s renegade path to victory in Iowa complicated by state Tea Party dissatisfaction

DES MOINES, IOWA | If Sarah Palin goes rogue in the Hawkeye State, will the Tea Party have her back?

That question appeared to be on Palin’s mind Friday in the few minutes that she spent behind closed doors here with state officials before her speech to 1,500 activists and operatives.

“How’s the Tea Party here?” she asked, according to those in the room backstage with her before the speech.

The query gets right to the heart of whether a Palin candidacy might be viable using the same outsider strategy she has utilized in sprinting to the front of the Republican pack so far.

Palin’s modus operandi since the 2008 campaign ended has been to go around the political and media establishment. She has raised money through small donors for the most part rather than courting the wealthy establishment, and has communicated through Facebook, Twitter and Fox News, largely avoiding interviews with journalists.

In Iowa, such a strategy might look like eschewing the traditional route of one-on-one retail politics that many Iowans expect and even demand. The calculated gamble would then be that grassroots support from Tea Party types and from disenchanted independents would overwhelm others who rely on different branches of the state party organization at the straw poll next August and in the January 2012 caucuses.

A prominent Democratic strategist in the state said that if Palin lets all the top political talent in the state get snatched up by others and hopes that her popular appeal will carry the day, she could “get her clock cleaned.”

But one veteran GOP operative already committed to another presidential hopeful said Palin’s star power might very well could be enough to run on.

“She has an immediate leg-up on anyone looking to the Iowa Straw Poll to get a running start on the Iowa Caucuses. She makes it very difficult to break through at the straw poll because of her natural ability to fill a place like Hilton Coliseum,” he said.

Mark McKinnon, a former campaign adviser to President George W. Bush who wrote a piece Sunday arguing that Palin can win the primary, agreed.

“Palin will be a hurricane in Iowa and they’ll all get swept up in the mania,” he said by e-mail.

Palin, he said, could go around the Iowa establishment with ease: “The hotter the water, the stronger the tea. And it’s hot out there.”

However, were Palin to pursue such a strategy, it would be complicated by two things: a Tea Party movement that is smaller than in other states, and a possible lack of excitement about her from some within the Tea Party.

The electorate in the Hawkeye State is not comparable to most states. The number of grassroots activists involved in the political process is larger than in most states, since Iowa’s first-in-the-nation status gives so much clout and incentive to individual voters to participate.

There are roughly 120,000 Iowa Republicans who took part in the 2008 caucuses, according to the state party. That’s out of 645,606 registered Republicans in a state of roughly 3 million people.

NEXT: Iowan Tea Party activists are not happy with Palin

  • Pingback: Hot Air » Palin: I’ll run for president if no one else “steps up”

  • Pingback: Dead Cats: 58%, 09/21/10, (3)44 James Brody | Dead Cats & Clippings - “The liberation of the human mind has been best furthered by…fellows who throw dead cats in sanctuaries.” H. L. Mencken

  • Callie369

    I’m in Pa, my sons are in AL and PA, daughter in OH, sister in PA, brothers in CA, TN, MD, and IOWA.

    One thing we all have in common? Willingness and DESIRE to vote for Sarah Palin in 2012! We are so sick of Dumbama and Moocherella, we could puke!

    • doncicciofitipaldi

      I’m afraid you are a victim of the conservative echo chamber. You might disagree with Obama’s policies (as long as you stay in the real world and don’t trip about socialism, communism, milsimism and kenyanism which are INSANE ideas. But to be willing to pick “puke” over Obama is just plain ignorant. That’s how we got Bush got elected. You want to go back to teh same policies that ruined the economy in the firm place? Such ignorance should be illegal.

      • theprofessor

        Be careful what you wish for. If ignorance was illegal, you’d be serving a life-sentence in San Quentin.

        • truebearing

          With daily torture.

      • jonavark

        ha ha! “mislimism”? In the “firm” place?

        dope.. when you write a post about ignorance… you really should smell check it.

  • jonavark

    #donduchiosh1ttipaldi

    >>>1. Would make policy decisions based on religious belief (the equivalent of guiding the ship of state not by a compas but by the entrails of a chicken)

    Don.. put down the KoolAid for a moment and tell us how many of those religious policy decisions she made in Alaska. You’re afraid of people that have some religious faith aren’t ya lefty?

    >>2. Has ZERO knowledge and understanding of international affairs and sees everything in black and white (us vs. them; angels vs demons)

    Don’t I don’t think you should bring up Obama here. ANd you have no idea what Palin knows about foreign affairs. It isn’t like it is the most complex issue./ Obama has pretty much FAILED on all fronts.

    >>3. Is anti-intellectual and ponders to the lowest common denominator.

    >>I can just keep going and going………

    Yes.. like the Sodimizer Bunny.

    this website sucks. it takes forever just to post a few things. crap.

    • doncicciofitipaldi

      Here’s what I DO know. Africa is NOT a coutry. You cannot see Russia from Alaska. Shia and Sunnies are NOT all Arabs. That’s just the few pearls of wisdom Palin had dropped on us so far. This is high-school level stuff.

      Why you brough Obama into the conversation is beyond me. If you’re gonna suggest that he somehow doesn’t know much about international relations….(even if you disagree with what he’s done so far, which even Republicans agree with)….you really live on Uranus. Come back to reality buddy

      • Supernatural Witness

        Said mister IQ 72; get the log out of your own IQ before going after a former gov who outsmarted big oil in her state and balanced her state’s budget with profit refunds for every citizen. That’s like the exact opposite of Obama’s results.

      • theprofessor

        You’re wrong and you know it, so that makes you a liar.

        Palin never said anything about Africa being a country – that was an “anonymous source” in the McCain camp, which we all know means it was made up by the press. In fact, it had to be retracted by MSNBC: “http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D94DQU5O0″

        You CAN see Russia from Alaska. You just can’t because you’re head isn’t out in the open. See here : http://www.bssd.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=15&Itemid=81

        I don’t even know WHERE you got this gem: “Shia and Sunnies are NOT all Arabs.” But I do know that it’s spelled “Sunnis”,,,and that your ignorance shows once again.

        We’ll all be waiting to read your apology for your incompetence.

        • doncicciofitipaldi

          Sorry to dissapoint “professor”. I am not wrong and YOU know it, so that makes YOU a liar. Sarah Palin is an idiot. Take it to the bank. If she ever beame President it would be a disatser. She makes GW Bush look like Einstein.

          • truebearing

            You can’t even spell, you abject idiot. You make Alvin Greene look like Eistein.

          • theprofessor

            Then where’s your proof? I gave you significant proof that you’re lying and you didn’t come up with a single counter-proof. Blowing smoke isn’t proof.

          • theprofessor

            Still waiting for that proof, fool.

      • truebearing

        Given your complete lack of intelligence you shouldn’t be taliking about Uranus. People will figure out it’s the location of your intellectual headquarters.

        • jonavark

          Oh God.. you come up with some of the very best!

      • jonavark

        Yes.. the city of Chicago is known for its international relations and dealings in foreign policy.

        You’re in over your head here. Not that it isn’t entertaining but really.. most of us are so much more intelligent and have a real gasp of the facts that you don’t have time left in your life to catch up. Give up.

    • scorpioman

      Don’t worry. You’re close to being banned.

  • riseabove

    I can’t say I wasn’t disappointed to see Palin make the decision to step down as Governor of Alaska but I understood at least some of the reasons why she did it. I wonder if one did extensive research on the subject, how many candidates they could dig up who was guilty of similar or even worse things, or were they all perfect before running in a presidential campaign?

    And yes, Hollywood and the Leftstream Media were instrumental in chopping her off at the knees before the public even had a chance to get to know her. Thankfully, most people are hip to their tactics, now. They can prepare ahead of time for hostile interviews and learn how to handle themselves without being taken by surprise. Too bad we as a society have to dillute and jade the very qualities we find so refreshing and endearing but that’s what its come down to. We have to think like a creep in order to win, just like the way cops have to do in order to outsmart the criminals.

  • adamincalifornia

    Oh no!

    What is happening to America!

    In just 18 months the percent of Americans who think that “Morality/Values” are the top issue facing the country has shrunk!

    http://s3.amazonaws.com/nytdocs/docs/483/483.pdf

    The massive 3% from 18 months ago has shrunk to 1%.

    My God! What is happening to this country?!

    Let us all thank the Lord that we have candidates like Christine O’Donnell, Mike Pence, Rick Santorum and Sarah Palin – all of whom lack any expertise in economic matters but are willing to talk all day about YOUR MORAL CONDITION!

    In the meantime, I think we all need to figure out where those 2% went and send them to a re-education camp.

    As for the 97% of Americans who are clearly wrong, we need to find some popular cause to hijack and then insist that Morality and values are a key component to such a movement. Any ideas?

    • jonavark

      See what I mean don? Instead of doing it in his closet he’s doing it online here.

    • Supernatural Witness

      I have to admit I love your little raving wigged solicitor photo. Just calm down Adam your are believing liberal propaganda about what Christians want to do. We want almost identical government only for slightly different reasons.

      America was founded by Christians as a Libertarian nation. That nation was taken away from them specifically because they were lassez faire in their attitude about civic involvement preferring to focus on industry, worship, and evangelism.

      About one generation ago we got a clue and began to be politically active and are now engaged in a long overdue struggle to regain the right to legislate from a Christian world view and not from a Marxist world view. It has been difficult because, while our numbers are high, our ideological enemy has had control of the flow of information such as academia, arts, media, and government agencies. Thank God for the internet and new media and private education and the vote.

      • truebearing

        Super,

        I admire your patience with people like Adam, but I’m afraid you “cast ye your pearls before swine…”

        • Supernatural Witness

          He can be witty and his icon matches his melodrama.

          • truebearing

            He is adept at histrionic, mindless rants. I’ll give him that dubious distinction. I guess I should consider it a form of humor.

  • adamincalifornia

    Because my post just got moderated because it contains links (I have to remember that Daily Caller for some reason doesn’t like people to back up posts with facts) here it is without links. You’ll have to wait for the moderation elves to wake up before the link version gets through, or you can paste the links that I forged.

    ———–

    Mike Pence has and will continue to blindside Palin.

    He has positioned himself with the SoCons and is now demanding that the Tea Party repent or die.

    thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/119425-pence-urges-activists-to-demand-social-conservatism-from-gop

    A top House Republican urged conservatives to “demand” of national GOP leaders that they hew to socially conservative principles.

    House Republican Conference Chairman Mike Pence (Ind.) put the pressure on national leaders to not write off social conservatives’ concerns, especially if they retake control of the House and/or Senate after this fall’s elections.

    Conservatives “must demand that leaders of the Republican Party” stand strong on social issues, Pence said at the Values Voter Summit in Washington.

    This comes 6 months after the CATO Institute found that the typical Tea Party activist was more socially liberal / indifferent than the typical Republican, and clearly more so than the establishment leadership.

    cato-at-liberty.org/libertarians-independents-and-tea-parties/

    This was the same strategy SoCons used in purging the California GOP of those who failed to shake bibles in the air and scream “repent!” They would create fake “races” between chosen SoCon candidates and crowd out media coverage of the heathen candidates. That strategy destroyed the GOP as a majority party here, but we are better in God’s eyes no doubt, even though we have no say whatsoever in the legislature.

    Admit it Tea Party – you’ve been had. The SoCons have taken over. Dick Armey even admitted as much a little over a week ago. And you get to pick between Palin, Pence and Santorum. Same crowd that brought you “Compassionate Conservatism” with its big spending and moralist legislative agenda.

    Way to go.

    • jonavark

      Isn’t it past your masturbation time? Why do it here?

      • doncicciofitipaldi

        Can’t really argue with Adam can you? lol

        • jonavark

          Adam has yet to make a cogent point derived from a real understanding of issues.. Debating him is like debating an 8 year old with his d__k in his hand.

          Don.. the ‘lol’s are stupid. Lighten up on em.

          • doncicciofitipaldi

            lol. but you are so amusing. adam makes some very good points based on logic and reality. You just call him stupid. Great rebutal. lol

          • jonavark

            LOL just because you can hit enter LOL on a blog post doesn’t LOL mean your posts merit any LOL reasonable response. LOL.

            You guys get what you de LOL serve lol!

      • adamincalifornia

        Well with tight a$$ed SoCons like yourself around, it just kills the mood.

        No chance for “lustfull thoughts” so you and Christine O’Donnell can be sure that, when either of you are in the room, no such sin stain the body politic.

        • jonavark

          oh god.. gays are so friggin dramatic. and pathetic sometimes.

        • truebearing

          Still hiding from the masturbation police? No one cares about your obsession with “touching yourself”. Maybe if you didn’t do it in public you wouldn’t keep getting arrested.

    • truebearing

      Adam ant,

      Doing your best to sow seeds of suspicion and doubt amongst the Tea Party so Obama and the Progressives stay in power? Read Atlas Shrugged again, idiot, maybe you’ll understand it this time.
      You are a liar, and we’ve been over this before. Republicans lose when they abandon social conservatism, like they have in California and all over the US in 2006. When they win it is because they stick to their core values, but you are afraid of that, so you lie.

      Why do you lie? Is it the Big Macs and a bottle of Boones farm wine you get paid to pretend to be libertarian by the Soros Shadow groups, or are you just filled with convoluted, warped ideas of your own creation?

      You cited the study by the Cato Institute, so I thought I would include their admission about the reliability of the study:

      “Anticipating criticisms, let me note that no survey is definitive, and few survey questions are definitive. It’s possible that some respondents would say “government should do more to solve our country’s problems” meaning that it should be cutting waste and reducing the national debt. And some people might understand “government should promote traditional values” to mean traditional values like self-reliance, thrift, and standing on your own too feet. But overall, I think these questions help us to separate broadly libertarian responses from conservatives and (social-democratic) liberals. And this poll suggests that Tea Partiers are not just conservative Republicans. At least some of them are more libertarian. Politicians trying to appeal to them should keep that in mind.”

      I will also point out that by the Cato Institutes own admission, libertarian voters are the ones who put Obama in the Whitehouse. They are the majority force in the hodgepodge of Independent voters who voted Democratic and allowed the nation to be destroyed under the Obama regime.

      Boy, you “libertarians” sure are bright.

      BTW, thanks for providing a link that refutes your ridiculous ranting. LOL!!!

  • adamincalifornia

    Mike Pence has and will continue to blindside Palin.

    He has positioned himself with the SoCons and is now demanding that the Tea Party repent or die.

    http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/119425-pence-urges-activists-to-demand-social-conservatism-from-gop

    A top House Republican urged conservatives to “demand” of national GOP leaders that they hew to socially conservative principles.

    House Republican Conference Chairman Mike Pence (Ind.) put the pressure on national leaders to not write off social conservatives’ concerns, especially if they retake control of the House and/or Senate after this fall’s elections.

    Conservatives “must demand that leaders of the Republican Party” stand strong on social issues, Pence said at the Values Voter Summit in Washington.

    This comes 6 months after the CATO Institute found that the typical Tea Party activist was more socially liberal / indifferent than the typical Republican, and clearly more so than the establishment leadership.

    http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/libertarians-independents-and-tea-parties/

    Admit it Tea Party – you’ve been had. The SoCons have taken over. Dick Armey even admitted as much a little over a week ago. And you get to pick between Palin, Pence and Santorum. Same crowd that brought you “Compassionate Conservatism” with its big spending and moralist legislative agenda.

    Way to go.

    • Supernatural Witness

      Pardon my ignorance but please educate me on the meaning of the term SoCons. I mean that sincerely not in sarcasm.

      • jonavark

        I think he Master-Baiter is referring to social conservatives. He may not know that because he probably got it form Huffers…

        This website sucks.

      • Supernatural Witness

        Oh I got it: Social conservative. You can stop panicking now: no one wants to take away your porn. You are a little mixed up about who has big numbers and who has small numbers. SoCons have about 40%. We only need 11% other to join us. A few Libertarians, a few Moderates, and a few angry Democrats will push us over the top. Libertarians of your flavor only have 10% at best. Your group is down there with the Green Party in voters. You need us a lot more than we need you.

        • des1

          SoCons are not even REMOTELY close to 40%. I’m not sure what you’re smoking (and why you’d be doing it as a SoCon), but the 40% number is EVERYONE who identifies themselves as a Conservative. That includes at least 10%-20% who you’d consider to be RINOs. Plus that would include Fiscal Conservatives who are socially Moderate.

          You’d be closer if you said you had the 11% and you just need another 40%.

  • Supernatural Witness

    I must say that I would be interested in your definition of socialism that does not include using progressive tax to redistribute wealth among citizens thru social programs.

    • doncicciofitipaldi

      lol. Dude…you really need to get a clue. Stop being concerned about social programs redistrubuting the wealth to those who actually need it (YOU) and start being concerned about wealth being accumulated at the top (NOT YOU) in the detriment of the middle class and the poor (YOU). You should really start looking at some real data and stop the nonsese.

      • Supernatural Witness

        I’m in the business owner investor class Mr IQ 72. Idf your IQ were thre points lower you couldn’t be held legally responsible for your actions. The wise, successful investors at the top are accumulating wealth by providing products and services people want to buy. The re-distributors use the power of the state to take money by confiscation to support you.

      • jonavark

        another poor lazy lefty who wants your money. YOU, don, need to go out and get a job. Then, if you can manage to stop drinking in the daytime, you need to start your own business, then, idiot, you need to start making payrolls and making a profit, then.. idiot.. you need to look back at what you said here and be embarrassed.

        • Supernatural Witness

          Ha ha ha

          • doncicciofitipaldi

            Yes….I was waiting for you to make that comment, so now I can reply just like Sarah Palin: “I’m like Shakespeare….I invent new words every day” .lol

          • truebearing

            donnysissy,

            You wouldn’t qualify as a Shakespearean fool. I don’t think they’d even allow you to hang out with the groundlings. A ditch dog you are, and with a pox upon your headpiece (and hopefully your codpiece too (we don’t need any more of your genes in the pool).

          • truebearing

            Super,

            The “inexistant” jobs are in the “jobs saved” category. They’re quite popular with the useful idiot class.

        • doncicciofitipaldi

          So…I’m poor, I’m lazy, I’m an idiot drunk that wants YOUR money and needs to go get one of those those inexistent jobs. (I cannot help but sense some form of projection here on jonavark here).

          You hear that unemployed and struggeling people that are still thinking about voting Republican this November? That’s how the Tea Party and the Republicans think about YOU. Food for thought………..

          • Supernatural Witness

            inexistent/ struggeling– Do you coin new words in every post?

          • jonavark

            you forgot illiterate.

  • flips

    Iowa is not a very Right Wing place. They will go for a more moderate form of the GOP than the Palin/Moral Majority wing.