Politics

Several key gubernatorial races feature third party candidate who could play spoiler

Photo of Alexis Levinson
Alexis Levinson
Political Reporter

Third party candidates could be spoilers in some gubernatorial races this year. While few actually have a chance of winning, according to the director of the University of Virginia’s Center for Politics, Larry Sabato, “they do complicate the calculus in a half-dozen states this year.”

Gubernatorial races have special significance this cycle, since whichever party controls the governor’s mansion will have a significant advantage in redistricting, a process which occurs once a decade in the wake of the census.

In Massachusetts, the state Treasurer Tim Cahill is running as an independent against Democratic incumbent Deval Patrick and Republican Charlie Baker.  While conventional wisdom dictates that a third party candidate usually ends up siphoning votes away from the candidate with which he or she is most similar, in this race Larry Sabato says Cahill, a former Democrat, “is draining votes from GOP nominee Charlie Baker, helping Democratic Gov. Deval Patrick.”

Jennifer Duffy of The Cook Political Report told TheDC that she agrees with this assessment.

“I think Cahill ends up helping Deval Patrick — just because he’s splitting the anti-Patrick vote, and so he ends up helping instead of hurting,” she said.

When an early poll of the race showed Cahill in second place, ahead of Baker, Republicans went on the offensive. The Republican Governor’s Association ran an ad targeting Cahill, and launched a website called The Cahill Report, which they use to attack Cahill’s candidacy.

Cahill’s poll numbers have gone down as a result — the latest polls show him in third place, trailing Baker by about 20 points. However, that hasn’t necessarily had the desired effect. Nathan Gonzalez of The Rothenberg Political Report points out: “Republicans started to pound him and his number went down, but you’re not seeing those votes go to Baker,” he explained.

At the very least, Gonzalez says, “Cahill will get enough [votes] to lower the percentage needed to win.” He says that it is “still an evolving race,” but at the moment, Cahill’s candidacy certainly seems to be hurting Baker.

In Maine, Eliot Cutler is running as an independent against the Republican mayor of Watertown, Paul LePage, and Democratic state Senator Libby Mitchell. Cutler is a former Democrat, and Sabato and Gonzalez say that he is taking Democratic votes from Mitchell. Duffy, on the other hand, cautions: “Don’t stop watching [Cutler] yet — I think that LePage is in a fade, and I’m not sure where Republicans can go.” The latest Rasmussen poll has LePage leading 45% to Mitchell’s 27% percent, with Cutler pulling in 14%.

NEXT: Minnesota, Rhode Island, Illinois, and Colorado

  • octavian61

    Well, M-ass-achusetts,if Deval Patrick wins reelection, you get what you deserve. But yet again, the electorate and him are birds of a feather. The words “Commonwealth” ring so true in your state as it did in the former Soviet Union. It was all wealth for the commom good. The only solution is the birth of the State of Western Massachusetts, a breakaway state as was done with those who were under Communist rule. The only solution.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Montana-Miles/100001262671418 Montana Miles

    “they do complicate the calculus in a half-dozen states this year.” From article.

    Voter calculus if it does exist will not be considered a complication unless your one of those that promises one thing to the people and instead does another . . .

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5t8GdxFYBU&feature=fvw

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hV-05TLiiLU

    The complication of voter calculus in mathematical terms may equal goodbye to those that break their promises.