Politics

10 questions with A.C. Clark, author of the critical Hugo Chavez biography ‘The Revolutionary Has No Clothes’

Photo of Jamie Weinstein
Jamie Weinstein
Senior Editor
  • See All Articles
  • Send Email
  • Subscribe to RSS
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Bio

      Jamie Weinstein

      Jamie Weinstein is Senior Editor of The Daily Caller. His work has appeared in The Weekly Standard, the New York Daily News and The Washington Examiner, among many other publications. He also worked as the Collegiate Network Journalism Fellow at Roll Call Newspaper and is the winner of the 2011 "Funniest Celebrity in Washington" contest. A regular on Fox News and other cable news outlets, Weinstein received a master’s degree in the history of international relations from the London School of Economics in 2009 and a bachelor's degree in history and government from Cornell University in 2006. He is the author of the political satire, "The Lizard King: The Shocking Inside Account of Obama's True Intergalactic Ambitions by an Anonymous White House Staffer."

A.C. Clark — a pseudonym the author used to protect himself and his family — is the author of the book “The Revolutionary Has No Clothes: Hugo Chavez’s Bolivarian Farce,” released in 2009. With last week’s election results in Venezuela making news, Clark agreed to answer 10 questions for The Daily Caller about his book and why Americans should care about what happens in the oil-rich Latin American country:

1.  Why did you write your book?

Two main reasons. First, because Chavez has truly destroyed my native country and its institutions. Second, because way too many “experts” and way too many “celebrities” praise his horrible regime, presenting it as a beautiful and just “revolution”. Whether these panegyrists are ignorant or deliberately deceitful is something I leave to my readers’ judgment.

2.  As concisely as you can, who is Hugo Chavez and why should Americans care about him?

Chavez is in some ways a stereotypical Latin American tyrant. But three things distinguish him from the rest. First, his ambitions extend far beyond the borders of Venezuela. Second, he has the (oil) money which others chieftains have traditionally lacked. Finally, his anti-Americanism and his anti-Western views are truly virulent.

3.  In the book, you talk about the “Chavez Lobby.” What do you mean by that?

In spite of all the posturing against lobbies (and in spite of all his unproven accusations concerning a supposed media blitz against him orchestrated by the United States government), Chavez himself spends hefty sums, millions and millions of dollars per year, in public relations in the United States and in other countries. In the book, I use evidence which is publically and easily accessible on the internet and which offers us a glimpse of Chavez’s efforts to cultivate his image.

4.  What have Chavez’s policies done to the Venezuelan economy?

In short: they have ruined it. Venezuela’s ranking in terms of economic freedoms have plummeted since he seized power. In spite of strict currency exchange controls, Venezuelan currency has been devaluated many times. Chavez has in fact suggested eliminating the currency, in favor of a very modern bartering system. The infrastructure of the country is in shambles: power outages are now everyday events. Just two weeks ago or so, Chavez introduced the idea of food rationing cards, a la Cuba. And all of this has happened during the period in which the country’s oil revenue has been the highest in history.

5.  How has his policies affected the political debate in Venezuela?

Political debate in Venezuela is, thanks to Chavez, effectively defunct. Since seizing power, he has not even once debated anyone. Arrogantly, he claims that “eagles [himself] do not hunt flies [any other mortal].” His preferred style is the monologue – more precisely, the eternal monologue. He talks and talks and talks, for hours on end, on national television, often forcing all broadcasters to transmit whatever it is he feels like talking about on any given occasion.

Whenever someone succeeds in somehow participating in one his fully staged and perfectly choreographed press conferences (not an easy thing to do), and asks a minimally sensible, non-adulatory question, Chavez insults him, and simply ignores the question. Just three days ago, Chavez publically humiliated a young lady journalist from France Press who asked him about the grotesque gerrymandering which his government passed a few months ago and which allowed his regime to seize roughly 64% of the seats in congress, even though he only obtained 48% of the popular vote, in the congressional elections of September 26.

NEXT: Clark talks about whether he believes Chavez is helping Iran’s nuclear program, whether Chavez would ever give up power peacefully, and what he thinks about Sean Penn and Oliver Stone’s love of Chavez

  • gringott

    Gangsterism is gaining in strength all over the world.