Opinion

Don’t hint, don’t wink: An immodest proposal

What does all this have to do with force readiness and “Don’t-hint-don’t-wink” or whatever they’re calling it these days?  My answer should by now be as painfully obvious as a suppurating genital rash: gays spread disease at a rate out of all proportion to their numbers in our population and should be excluded from the military.  Gone are those happy days when a cheerful medic could give you a “pro shot” — a massive dose of antibiotic — before your wild weekend that would protect you from the consequences of every folly, unless you got mugged.  Herpes and AIDS are infectious and chronic and the latter, despite advancements in lengthening and improving the lives of its sufferers, will eventually kill you as dead as a bullet in your brain unless something else gets you first.  The military has depended on “blood on the hoof” — transfusions from live donor to live recipient — ever since transfusions were perfected by the discovery of blood groups in 1901.  A significant population of gays in the military has the potential for disastrous health consequences.

Let’s remember that we’re not talking about a significant fraction of our population.  Kinsey’s notorious World War II-era study concluded that about 10% of adult males in the United States were homosexual.  Never considered in his study was the fact that most able-bodied American male heterosexuals were elsewhere, serving as part of The Greatest Generation, leaving a larger percentage of gays at home to keep one another contented.  Later studies have almost universally concluded that the percentage of gays in our male population is between 1% and 6%.  The recent National Health and Social Life Survey put the figure at 2.5%.  The percentage of lesbians is estimated to be between 0.5% and 3%.

Finally, most gays are not inclined toward military service, but many lesbians are, and it is an open secret that they do well in the calling, especially in medical and administrative specialties.  I am certain that I knew some during my 20 years in the Army, although I didn’t ask and they didn’t tell.  In the era of conscription, gays had two options: lie and be inducted, or “come out” to be branded and rejected.  It was a wretched choice that produced desperately unhappy men.  I served alongside one such man in Vietnam.

Now back to that communal shower.  It’s no secret that men are generally much more susceptible to sexual arousal through visual stimuli than are most women.  Many gays will deny that this is the case with them, but why then is the Internet saturated with gay porn?  I don’t claim to be a Constitutional law scholar on a par with President Obama, but shouldn’t the overwhelmingly straight warriors who answer their county’s call be spared the indignity of showering with other men who achieve lascivious enjoyment from the sight of those lithe naked bodies, and who may be tempted to seek more than the view?  They are, after all, guys.  If a Constitutional right to privacy that guarantees access to abortionists can be summoned from thin air, certainly the prohibition against involuntary servitude should prevent unwilling heterosexual men from providing beefcake parades without their informed consent, at least penumbrally.

Joseph A. Rehyansky is retired from the United States Army and the Chattanooga, Tennessee, District Attorney’ Office. He is a former contributor to National Review whose writings have also appeared in Human Events Online, The American Spectator, and other publications.