Opinion

Pork bill showdown: a win for the GOP

Photo of Ron Hart
Ron Hart
Contributor

The resounding win by the Republicans in November holds the promise of getting some control on spending in Washington. It seems, for the moment, that Congress is focusing on this goal, thanks to its members’ feet being held to the fire by the Tea Party.

Like the 2006 election, the 2010 midterms were decided by the only growing bloc of voters, independents and libertarians (up from 19% in 1970 to about 29% in 2010), who swung the election decisively to the GOP this year.

Democrats did not get the message. They continued their pork-laden ways by stuffing the next two spending bills like Michael Moore’s mouth on Thanksgiving. It is like getting caught stealing at Wal-Mart and, while being held in the security guard’s office waiting for the police, trying to steal some of his stuff, too. And “Dingy Harry” Reid of Nevada keeps stealing even after the store alarm has gone off, knowing the cops won’t be there till January 3rd.

When the Democrats took over Congress in 2006, the approval rating of that august body was only 31%. Nancy Pelosi said she wanted to reverse that, and she did. It is now 13%.

Some call the Democrats “socialists,” but I think it is worse than that. Centrally-controlled countries like Cuba guarantee everyone a job, a troubling prospect for most Democrat moochers who prefer to sit at home and get a check from the government. And no one will lend Cuba any money, so it cannot run up massive deficits while giving everything away to the hitchhikers of society.

Much of the Obama economic team has resigned. This shocked people; Obama has an economics team?

Even the head of his Budget Office, Peter Orszag, quit. Good riddance, since he squandered his credibility fiddling with Obamacare’s costs so Congress would pass it. After that, he spent most of his time deciding whether “gazillion” or “bazillion” should come after “trillion.”

Nerd Orszag accomplished what he came to Washington to do. He married a hot Good Morning America co-host who is four pay grades above his non-D.C. dating level. This is why I call Washington, D.C. “Hollywood for ugly people.” Where else could this happen? I know Henry Kissinger said “Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac,” but Orszag must also have slipped his lady a mickey and some ecstasy.

Obama was forced to withdraw support for the biggest tax increase in history and agree instead to the Bush-era tax rate extension. As he always does, he blamed others by accusing the GOP of “holding the American middle class hostage.” Since they are “holding Americans hostage,” maybe Obama will say he voted for the measure because he suffered from Stockholm Syndrome. He, of course, is the hero in his own mind who rescued the fictitious hostages. I bet the Nobel Prize committee took notice. I smell an Oscar.

Poor leadership, rising gas prices, a poor economy and high unemployment make Obama seem just like Jimmy Carter. Now we have a “hostage” situation and problems with Russia over nuclear missiles. All that’s left is a revival of Emerson, Lake and Palmer to make it déjà vu all over again.

  • cashman

    This is so true:

    “This is why I call Washington, D.C. “Hollywood for ugly people.”

    How else do you explain troll Alan Greenspan marrying reporter Andrea Mitchell.

    And they are doing it with our money. If they had made the money and impressed women that would be one thing, they are dating on our tax money , using it for bait.

    Hart rocks!

  • kbull

    I think dims are ignorant. Worse, many dims and the Obama admin are arrogant.
    I read this:
    Ignorance and arrogance have subtle differences … an ignorant person usually has no clue, whereas an arrogant person has no clue with an alarming degree of confidence.
    This describes Obama to a “T”

  • carpediemtexas

    Hart is a master, this subtle line is perfect

    “Speaking of “in arrears,” Barney Frank has dug a trillion-dollar hole for us with his oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.” LOL

    .

  • marlynmonkey

    Dead on : “Peter Orszag, quit. Good riddance, since he squandered his credibility fiddling with Obamacare’s costs so Congress would pass it. After that, he spent most of his time deciding whether “gazillion” or “bazillion” should come after “trillion.”