US

SPJ Diversity Committee launches journalistic campaign against the term ‘illegal immigrant’

Photo of Matthew Boyle
Matthew Boyle
Investigative Reporter

The Diversity Committee of the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ) is seeking to “inform and sensitize” reporters nationwide about how “offensive” the term “illegal immigrant” is to Latinos.

Diversity Committee member Leo Laurence announced the campaign against “illegal immigrant” and “illegal alien” terminology in the latest issue of the organization’s magazine, Quill, writing that those who have not obtained citizenship but have entered the country without any prior approval should be called “undocumented workers” or “undocumented immigrants.”

In his report, Laurence quotes SPJ Diversity Committee chairman George Daniels as saying, “this is not about being politically correct,” but about aiming to “minimize harm,” when reporting. When Daniels says “minimize harm,” he is referring to one of the major tenets of SPJ’s code of ethics, which many journalists nationwide follow.

Laurence defends SPJ’s new campaign by offering an interpretation of the Constitution that provides for constitutional rights for everyone, including non-citizens, saying that any person should be presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. He said that, constitutionally, a judge is the only person who can deem anyone or anything “illegal.”

Conservative columnist and media personality Michelle Malkin thinks this campaign shows that SPJ is not an objective news source.

“I think that they should drop the pretense that they are an objective news organization, especially because the euphemism that they favor is far more politically loaded than the one that they’re trying to replace,” Malkin said in a phone interview with The Daily Caller. “It’s a farce to call someone an ‘undocumented worker’ who is full of fake, fraudulent documents and that is usually the case with many of the suspected illegal immigrants that these stories refer to.”

Even the Associated Press, which conservatives have critiqued for their use of labeling in the past, recommends using the term “illegal immigrant.”

“The AP Stylebook created its entry on ‘illegal immigrant’ in 2004, in response to renewed debate over border security and the enforcement of immigration laws after the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks,” AP’s deputy standards editor David Minthorn explained in an e-mail. “Together, the terms describe a person who resides in a country unlawfully by residency or citizenship requirements. Alternatives like undocumented worker, illegal alien or illegals lack precision or may have negative connotations. Illegal immigrant, on the other hand, is accurate and neutral for news stories.”

  • Pingback: SPJ Diversity Committee launches journalistic campaign against the term ‘illegal immigrant’

  • Pingback: The Daily Caller, Not A News Organization, Plain & Simple – The Critical Post/Chi | thecritical-post.com

  • libertyville

    It continues a trend we have seen only too bltantly, the abandonment of facts by the media and selfcalled journalists.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Richard-Hamilton/609225545 Richard Hamilton

    How about calling them what they are – an invasion force?

    Come here in compliance with our laws and be a guest, maybe even become a citizen.

    Come here in violation of our laws and…well, you really don’t want to know the sort of
    solution I’d favor, except that shutting down illegal border traffic would probably
    result in less fatalities than the zetas and the desert kill every year.

  • robb32

    illegalimmigrant, illegalimmigrant, illegalimmigrant…et-al. Fire Napolitano NOW.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jasmine-Clark/1785223171 Jasmine Clark

    bawww we can’t call the undocumented people illegal because it will hurt their feelings.

    “In his report, Laurence quotes SPJ Diversity Committee chairman George Daniels as saying, “this is not about being politically correct,””

    uh i’m pretty sure it IS.