The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller

Environmental community anxiously awaits State of the Union

In this year’s State of the Union address, the environmental community will be looking for the president to defend the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and promise progress on the renewable energy front, in the absence of congressional action.

When it came to renewable energy, President Obama kept the focus of his 2010 State of the Union address on the need to remain competitive in the global market. “There’s no reason Europe or China should have the fastest trains, or the new factories that manufacture clean energy products,” he said, emphasizing the need for investment in green technology.

“We have gone from a bystander to a leader in the fight against climate change,” Obama added.

At the time, the president called on Congress to pass comprehensive energy legislation. Now, however, after the failure of Waxman-Markey in the House and the Republican surge in the November midterms, the chances of such a bill making its way through Congress are almost zero.

That means the environmental community is looking solely to the executive branch to make any headway on energy policy.

Last week, a group of more than 20 environmental advocacy groups sent a letter to President Obama calling on him to defend the Clean Air Act against a recent “unprecedented attack” from some members of Congress and polluters who say the act does not give the EPA the authority to regulate carbon emissions.

The letter was signed by top execs at organizations like the Defenders of Wildlife, Earthjustice, Environmental America, World Wildlife Fund, and Friends of the Earth.

“Our organizations cannot overstate the priority we put on preventing efforts to block, weaken or delay implementation of this vital law, which at every stage in its history has garnered overwhelming bipartisan support,” said the letter.

While the Clean Air Act is an immediate concern for most activists, they’re also not holding back their opinions of what the president should address in this year’s State of the Union.

Dan Weiss of the Center for American Progress wrote last week that not only should the president’s speech include  a comprehensive energy agenda, it should also contain a threat to “veto congressional efforts to block or slow” progress on energy policy.

According to Weiss, Obama’s energy priorities should include protecting Americans’ health, reducing dependence on oil, saving energy and money, and increasing American competitiveness by investing in clean energy technologies.

“President Obama should forcefully reiterate his determination to keep the United States in the global clean energy race by working with members from both parties to pass legislation that boosts investments…in the clean energy technologies of the future,” said Weiss.

“The State of the Union presents a golden opportunity for the president to contrast conservative opposition with his reaffirmation of the nation’s commitment to a clean energy future,” he added.

Tony Kreindler of the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) told The Daily Caller that he will be looking for the president to do two things during his speech: continue to make the case for clean energy and defend the EPA’s carbon regulations.

“There is room for bipartisan movement here,” said Kreindler. “Whether he will get into specifics, I don’t know.”

“The EPA fight is first and foremost on our minds,” he added. “It would be great for the president to make the case that regulations are not necessarily a bad thing…and explain to the American public why it’s so important for the EPA to be able to carry out its congressionally-mandated responsibilities.”

  • the dirtmover

    If you want to see just how great ECO regulation is, just look to CA.
    Just about the strictest in the world. Businesses are leaving in droves.
    EVEN the so-called “green” companies. WE have CARB. ( look them up) And the ECO kids want the FED EPA to be modeled after CA??? Obummer might as well just sent the keys to the U.S. to China. They damned near own us now as it is.

  • Cliff2008

    The EPA, like every other government program has a tendency to do, has lost sight of its intended purpose. Instead of enforcing regulations by holding tresgressors to account, it has embarked on a mission of setting policy and instituting preemptive punishments based on political bias. During the Gulf oil spill, if it hadn’t been so serious, it would have been comical to watch the efforts to protect the wetlands of Louisiana being hampered by EPA regulations to protect the wetlands. California, in desperate need of cash, will not allow offshore drilling even in areas where drilling would relieve pressure where natural seepage is occuring. Farms are left to endure water shortages because building an irrigation duct might endanger some type of fish. God forbid they take a bucket full to another location and see how that works out. The EPA needs to be a tough love partner of business instead the vehicle of obstuction that it has become. Either that or it needs to be defunded.

  • Jungle Jack

    The U.S. should follow the lead of developing countries like China and India. Let American industry and inventiveness run wild. Take restraints and regulations off the board. Within 30 years we will again be the most progressive and economically successful country in the history of the world.
    As far as cutting back on entitlement programs, all the talk is about Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. How about cutting back on Welfare and making it more realistic. Get rid of all the illegal aliens in this country. Perhaps if we spent money on Americans and not illegals, we could help our own homeless and helpless.

    • Drahcir

      When will the people finaly see what the EPA and enviralmentalist(yes i know thats wronge) have done to this nation. Before they were a group that we hardly heard of, Now they are mainstream. The EPA worked better when it worked in the shadows. And these groups have gone from eco freaks to politcal leftist. Strip their power and leave us alone, things would be a lot better.

  • Russell C

    Greenhouse gas regulation is down to its two last best hopes, the EPA and the Courts. EPA is charging ahead, but will very likely be shackled by some kind of restraining lawsuits soon. Meanwhile, two major global warming nuisance lawsuits are still kicking around, the “Kivalina v Exxon” is somewhere in the 9th District system, and the “Connecticut v American Electric Power” one will have an appeal by AEP heard at the Supreme Court later this spring.

    Both avenues still suffer from a massive unnoticed fault, as I described in my Breitbart article last November, “Global Warming Nuisance Lawsuits Are Based on a Fatal Flaw” http://biggovernment.com/rcook/2010/11/27/global-warming-nuisance-lawsuits-are-based-on-a-fatal-flaw/ We are told by the entire far-left not to listen to the skeptic scientists because they’ve been bought off by big coal and oil to ‘make stuff up’ and stretch out the “settled debate”. Problem is, the corruption accusation is not just some generic one, it is solely based on a phrase taken from a 1991 memo – and the memo itself is never show in its complete context by anyone claiming the memo phrase is all the smoking gun proof they need. Worse, the person who Al Gore himself credits for finding the memo (which turns out not to be the case) is widely described as a Pulitzer winner, even though the man has never won it.

  • Delmarjackson

    There is no longer any environmemtal group that is not headed by Anti american social justice freaks.
    The USA grew by 100 million in last 4o years and nearly all of that via immigration , and we are on rack to reach a half a billion in a few decades via immigration, yet the greens will not voice a whisper of dissent against unending ever growing immigration.

    didn’t the sierra club get 100 million a few years back from one of bernie madoffs buddies and told to never expect a dime more if they raised a squawk about immigration.

    screw the environmentalists, as they sure are screwing us, or at least their leaders are and their members wear a moral crown and do nothing that will not be neutalized by massive immigration.

  • derkrieger

    Green us the new Red. I thought Liberals cared about the poor. If so then why do they push and support policies that increase the cost of living for the poor? Ethanol has increased food prices, Obama’s preferred coal policies would “necessarily cause electricity prices to skyrocket” and his only objection to higher gas prices is the pace at which they rise. The eco-Marxist, Gaia-worshiping coastal elitists need to be confronted by the tens of thousands of coal miners, oil workers, coal and oil equipment manufacturers at al and their families they are seeking to put out of work. These GD people need to be stopped hard and fast before they finish the job of destroying our economy that their Alinskyite president has started.

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Environmental community anxiously awaits State of the Union | The Daily Caller - Breaking News, Opinion, Research, and Entertainment -- Topsy.com