The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller

Show trials? Schultz, Sharpton propose FCC review board, public hearings to keep radio talkers in line

Some have insisted the chance for the renewal of the Fairness Doctrine is a straw man argument perpetrated by conservatives to stir emotions so that they are able to exploit it politically and that this really isn’t a threat from legislators.

However, that doesn’t mean there aren’t still those who want to see government intervene and regulate the airwaves in a way a Fairness Doctrine would. On MSNBC’s Monday airing of “The ED Show,” host Ed Schultz asked his guest, National Action Network President Al Sharpton, if there should be ways that the Federal Communications Commission could intervene in the wake of the alleged hostile reaction to a California state senator’s proposed boycott of Rush Limbaugh.

“How would you anticipate the FCC governing what talkers might say on the air in situations like this?” Schultz said. “Would there be a review board? Would it go — because obviously once the license is given out, they still put talkers on the air. What if they continue to act like that and who would be the judge on what’s over the line?”

Sharpton said Schultz’s suggestions could work and would be appropriate just as profanity is regulated on the airwaves.

“I think that they can determine that in public hearings,” Sharpton said. “There could be a review board. There could be a commission. Just as they do when they enforce – you can’t use profanity and other things on the air. There are already standards they have even after they give licenses. This would only include in the existing list of things they set as standards in the first place, particularly given a climate like this.”

Watch:

YouTube Preview Image

Why this step? According to the National Action Network president, the call for civility after the shooting of Arizona Democratic Rep. Gabrielle Giffords last month warrants it.

“We are less than a week away from when you had people sitting together in the House of Representatives talking about civility where the president called for this nation in the middle of a tragedy to be more civil and then we have state senators being threatened like this,” Sharpton said. “We have the governor of Ohio insulting the entire caucus of color in his state. I think this is an outrageous answer to a level of — that I think the country must reach and that is calling on the president’s call for civility and all of us must deal with this and deal with it in a responsible way.”

  • BigRmv

    So, Schultz/Sharpton, let’s see if I understand this: The best way to keep communications open and have a dialog is to NOT allow people to express themselves?

    Here’s an idea: Check the first 10 amendments to the US Constitution, re-read what has been said/written here, then try to make a proposal that would work AND not violate everyone’s rights.

  • Realist4U

    Hey! Sgt Schultz! Go check the stalag!

  • kolaboy

    Ed would seriously sacrificed a meal (but only one) if he could, by some miracle, become relevant.

  • cat58

    Whats fair is to finally indict and convict sharpton to life in prison for the tawana brawley incident. shultz ( along with all the rapists, drug dealers, child molesters and murderers sitting in our prisons eating up our tax dollars) should be airlifted over Afghanistan each given an M16 and told good luck and find bin laaden and then dropped over the mountains.

  • J L Fuller

    Is there anyone out there who really cares what these two think? I mean really.