The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller

Pop culture at CPAC: Kurt Elling and conservatism

Mark Judge
Author, A Tremor of Bliss

This week, two of my favorite events are taking place. Their synchronicity has caused me to reflect, once again, on one of the major problems, indeed perhaps the premier problem, facing the right. Conservatives just don’t do popular culture.

The two events are the annual CPAC convention in Washington and the release of jazz singer Kurt Elling’s new record, “The Gate.” What could these two things possibly have to do with each other? The fact that they seem to be from different galaxies only makes the point: conservatives do not understand, celebrate, or in any meaningful way care about popular culture. It’s why we look myopic and joyless to a lot of people. And the popular culture lineup CPAC has is enervating. It’s like when liberals get a minister to say a blessing at a conference. Something just seems off.

Although the reason a minister should not be blessing Planned Parenthood is obvious (let us praise dead babies!), the reason conservatives continually fumble popular culture is not. Kurt Elling became one of my favorite singers on Saint Patrick’s Day, 2006. He was playing at the Strathmore Center, a breathtaking concert hall in Maryland. Elling, a former divinity student at the University of Chicago, was performing the classic “My Foolish Heart.” In the middle of the song, the band slowed down and the piano and bass drifted back into silence until there was only a soft thump of the drum. Elling began to sing:

One dark night
Fired with love’s urgent longings
Clothed in sheer grace
I went out unseen
My house being now all still


It was from “The Dark Night of the Soul,” the classic by the 16th-century mystic St. John of the Cross. Elling was poetically commingling a standard from the great American songbook with a Catholic mystic. I felt chills, as I do now writing this and remembering the performance. It was the kind of moment that should have been captured in the pages of First Things, National Review or the Weekly Standard. Indeed, an orthodox theologian with a working knowledge of John Paul II’s “theology of the body” could have captured Elling’s juxtaposition of the sacred and the carnal better than a writer for the Washington Post or Rolling Stone. And we shouldn’t be covering these things simply for political gain, although that’s fine. We should because we are believers in God, and the beauty of God is reflected in the beauty of the arts. I’m sorry, but a monster truck pull just doesn’t cut it.

I wrote about the night Elling sang his prayer in my new book “A Tremor of Bliss: Sex, , and Rock ‘n’ Roll.” The book is an attempt to make the case for the conservatism of popular culture, particularly popular music. It’s not only obvious that popular music tends to follows certain sonic formats that are arguably more inflexible than classical and jazz; it’s that the themes in popular music are conservative. In our secular world, popular music celebrates transcendent love that conquers time, space, mountains, rivers and valleys. And more than one person has argued that punk rock, with its do-it-yourself ethic and disdain for drugs and hippies, is actually right-wing. On top of that, the best explanation of the spiritual grandeur of U2 was offered by conservative Stephen Catanzarite in his book “U2 Achtung Baby: Love in the Shadow of the Fall.” It argues that at the heart of U2’s music is a dynamic balance between calling for peace and justice and the recognition that this fallen world can be a terribly sad place — that, as St. Augustine said, our hearts are restless until they rest in God.

Seriously, there should be entire right-wing foundations dedicated to this stuff.

  • emem

    How can they when by and large many of supporting organizations don’t even support or acknowledge the center right public?

  • CWsDad

    “It’s why we look myopic and joyless to a lot of people. ”

    Well, it’s ONE reason why. I can think of a few others -

    1. Joyless – a callous view on public policy.

    2. Myopic – an obstinate perspective on climate change with a primary concern being the implications of greener policies on today’s economy (odd how today’s economic challenges are some how more important the the future health of our planet)

    3. Joyless and Myopic – a stubborn insistence that gay marriage would somehow damage and devalue unions between heterosexuals.

    4. Myopic – tax cuts for the wealthy in order to “stimulate jobs”. Especially ironic when the recent populist tone of conservatives is juxtaposed against the economic domination of the top 1%. (For those of you who aren’t keeping score at home the top 1% now accounts for 25% of all earned income. Good thing the Republicans stood firm on tax cuts for them, huh?)