Clean energy technology wins out in Obama’s budget

While House Republicans are preparing to slash spending for renewable energy projects in their plan to fund the government through the rest of this year, President Obama proposed “significant investment” on similar projects in his budget proposal released Monday for fiscal year 2012.

In total, the president is proposing an additional $8 billion for clean energy projects across all federal agencies, with a focus on research and development.

For the Department of Energy (DOE), the president requested a 12 percent increase over the current level to $29.5 billion. The budget promises to incur savings, however, through “cuts to inefficient fossil energy programs.” The proposal comes just three days after DOE Secretary Steven Chu outlined how the agency would cut wasteful spending.

The Office of Science is slated to receive $5.4 billion increase in funding in the president’s proposal, and the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy a is slated to get total of $550 million.

The president wants to double the number of Energy Innovation Hubs throughout the country from three to six as a challenge to “America’s scientists and engineers to assemble teams of the best minds in their fields to focus on the hardest problems in clean energy.”

The proposal calls the hubs the “Apollo projects of our time.”

Obama also reiterated the goal he laid out in his State of the Union address last month of one million electric cars on the road by 2015. To do so, the administration proposes transforming an existing $7,500 tax credit into a rebate for consumers who buy electric vehicles, spending $588 million on vehicle technology at the Department of Energy (DOE), and rewarding communities that pursue electric vehicle infrastructure with a $200 million incentive program.

The president also lays out how the government could fund his proposed Clean Energy Standard (CES) – a goal that would double the amount of electricity used from clean energy sources by 2035. The budget includes up to $36 billion in future loans for nuclear power plants and $200 million in credit for $1 to $2 billion dollars in loan guarantees for innovation in energy efficiency.

Moreover, in an effort to fund reducing emissions from commercial buildings, the budget proposes a “Race to Green” program, similar to the Department of Education’s “Race to the Top” that makes states compete for funding. The program aims to reduce energy usage by 20 percent by 2020.

To help pay for it all, the budget proposes rolling back tax breaks and subsidies to the oil industry, totaling $46.2 billion.

  • Pingback: Why does America need 4,182 new IRS workers? Obama put it in his budget, but didn’t say what the ‘goon squad’ would do

  • Pingback: Clean energy technology wins out in Obama’s budget – Daily Caller | Like My Comment

  • barryaz

    Why don’t we put a huge tax on all the environmentalists who have been responsible for most of our manufacturing to leave, the inability to build any nuclear power plants, and other blocking measures used to keep America from moving into the future. Hasn’t anyone of these progressives ever heard of the free market or supply and demand,etc.?

  • Pingback: Obama Budget | Green Technology Wins Big Budget | The Daily Caller … | Welcome2Green

  • snappercat

    Weren’t there problems in Texas a week or so ago with rolling blackouts? And the administration wants to increase the number of plug-in cars guzzling electricity?

  • kbull

    The problem with Obozo’s energy ideas is that electric cars still use electricity that is produced by fossil fuels. Bozo is good at robing Peter to pay Paul, but he has no idea about reality concerning physics. He is a dumb son of a bItxch.

    • kbull

      Looking at what I have just said… I don’t see any misjudgement.

  • Pingback: Clean energy technology wins out in Obama’s budget | DailyRoot

  • flips

    Republicans will do anything it takes to protect their beloved pollution industry.

    They HEART oil and coal more than their own grandchildren.

    Happy Valentines’s Day, polluters.

    • Drahcir

      Excuse me flips,

      How are you going to refuel that eletric car? Solar power? Takes too long.Wind power? Not thesable in small communitys. I know, water power. Nah, you have got to live on the coast. I guess you will have to use those old power plants, Huh.

    • TommyV

      Hey flips…..I think I’ll keep my Ferrari and let you buy those little electric sh-t boxes…..sound good to you :)!

      I hope GM builds a million of them……..let’s see how many sell….can you say Zero! What a clown you are.

    • missy8s

      When all of those evil fish killing hydroelectric dams are blown up, coal fired power plants are demolished and those evil nuclear plants are dismantled, exactly what do you think will power your government motors 50 mph, 47 mile maximum range limited car?????

      Wind WON’T do it, Solar is at least 100 years from being efficient and cow crap sure won’t do the job if everyone is FORCED to become vegan.

      You’re not just dumb, you’re F**KING DUMB!

      • barryaz

        Hey Missy,

        How far could you get from using the crap that flips says to power the car? Just ask’n