The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller

TheDC’s Jamie Weinstein: On Islamist radicalization and fiscal matters, meet the blind, deaf and dumb Democrats

Here is all Republicans need to do to ensure the 2012 election is another successful one for them: Get Americans to watch last week’s House Homeland Security Committee hearing on the threat of Islamist radicalization in the American Muslim community.

What Americans will see is a relatively serious Republican Party investigating what any sentient being – and many non-sentient beings – know is a problem, which is the threat of Islamist radicalization. And they will see Republicans doing so without demonizing Muslims more broadly.

What Americans will also see is a completely unserious, comically preposterous Democratic Party acting as if Islamist radicalization is not a serious threat — or just as great a threat in our current age as Jewish and Quaker extremism. To believe that, of course, you have to be willfully ignorant or worse.

If you cannot recognize Islamist terrorism as a unique threat in our post-9/11 world, then perhaps you shouldn’t have a role in governing America and you especially shouldn’t have a seat on the House Homeland Security Committee. Instead of asking relevant questions during the hearing, Homeland Security Committee Democrats demanded investigations into the KKK, derided the expertise of the superb and levelheaded witnesses and went on a few crazy-eyed rants.

Radical Islamist terror is not the equivalent of other potential lone-wolf, one-off attacks that threaten the American homeland from fringe actors. Islamists have declared war on America and want to destroy it, but perhaps it is unfair that I expect Democratic lawmakers to have read the words of an obscure Arab philosopher named Osama bin Laden. To fill the House Homeland Security Democrats in, international jihadists are seeking weapons of mass destruction to commit mass casualty events, attacks that would make 9/11 look minuscule by comparison – and it simply makes sense that they would, as they already have had some success in doing, seek out sympathetic and vulnerable elements of the American Muslim community to radicalize along the way.

Considering reading bin Laden’s words seem a bit too burdensome, I imagine there is little chance that House Democrats have heard of Anwar al-Awlaki, an American-born Muslim now hiding out in Yemen and radicalizing American Muslims to commit terrorist attacks  – Nidal Hassan, the Muslim Army officer who murdered fellow American soldiers at Ft. Hood, was one of his frequent correspondents.

Call me a fear-mongerer, but the threat of Islamist radicalization seems to me to be a legitimate area of congressional investigation. In fact, how irresponsible would it be if Congress did not look into the threat of American Islamist radicalization?

Indeed, two of the witnesses at the hearings had witnessed their relatives become radicalized. It is important for us to understand why this happens so we can try to prevent it. Most Americans — Republicans as well as Democrats — know this. The only people who don’t are the Democrats in Congress and their most lunatic supporters.

So, America, I introduce to you the “Blind, Deaf and Dumb” Democrats. This group is staunchly and unwaveringly committed to keeping their heads stuck in the sand and making sure that no one, anywhere, is ever offended.

  • riseabove

    If they do another remake of H. G. Well’s “War of the Worlds” they should make sure they have a big, blue D stamped on the backs of the three guys who foolishly approached a steaming, burning otherworldly meteor waving a peace flag.

    That isn’t to say that diplomacy doesn’t have its place. Ach, why bother explaining any of this to them? They’ll never get it.

  • The Die Hard

    That Jamie Weenie, like all repukeli-baggers, is stupid, a liar, a hypocrite, a grandstanding jackoff, a psychotic, and desperately in need of inpatient psychiatric treatment, has long been known.

    That he’s so desperate for attention as to make his vomit up out of thin air to justify his stupidity, insanity, and lies is not surprising, but he IS pathetic.

    A “serious” repukelican party?!? “Superb, level-headed” psychotic ranting teabagging bigots?!?!?! Oh, and those “weapons of mass destruction” — which never existed — were of COURSE the reason why Dickless exposed a CIA undercover operative before she could point out that the only weapons trafficking was being done by the bushdicks themselves.

    Fact. More than twice as many terrorist attacks have been carried out on American soil BY WHITE AMERICAN NATIONALS, your modern-day KKK, your home-grown christo-fascist religio-whackos, your gun nuts and militia morons, as by any “radicalized Muslims.”

    America, I introduce you to the paranoid schizophrenic bigots of Jamie Weenie’s world, who are so increasingly ignored that they’re about to pull an Operation Liberty and try to carry out a terrorist attack and blame it on”them ragheads!” as soon as they can figure out how to get the scarf out of their butt.

    • truebearing

      I’ve never hoped someone could live up to his alias more, or sooner. You are one depraved, deranged, idiot.

  • krjohnson

    With all due respect (which is actually very little if any), Mr Weinstein, if every American saw the ridiculous theater being put on by Peter King in the congress Republicans would only get votes from anti-intellectual fear mongers like yourself.

    Even if terrorists could pull off an attack on the scale of 9-11 every single year, your risk of dying in a terrorist attack is much lower than your risk of dying in a car accident, by walking across the street, by drowning, in a fire, by falling, or by being murdered. As it is, your risk of dying in a terrorist attack is slightly greater than your risk of being killed by lightning.

    And, I would like to point out, the chances of another 9-11 style terrorist attack went to zero the day after 9-11. As soon as they secured the cabin doors on commercial jets, that threat was no more.

    Our government has a heck of a lot more important things to do than chase around some third world fanatics wearing towels on their heads. We’ve killed far more Afghans following 9-11 than Americans that were killed on 9-11. More Americans have been killed in Afghanistan following 9-11 than were killed on 9-11. The cost benefit analysis of this whole operation is completely out of whack. We don’t need to spend $2 billion every WEEK fighting a no-win war in a third world country halfway across the world. We don’t need to lose any more good men in this hopeless conflict.

    The government should do what it can using intelligence operations and police forces without violating the civil liberties of the people to prevent another terrorist attack. We should maintain a navy and air force capable of deterring an armed invasion from any country. Other than that, we need to stop all of this nonsense.

    • SamAdams25

      With all due respect, you, Sir, are a moron.

      • krjohnson

        Thank you for confirming that I have won the battle of ideas.

        • ladylove

          yah admitting you are a moran, is surely a win win,

          • krjohnson

            If you can’t level an argument against me then I assume I win. Thanks.

    • gregg

      Completely agree with krjohnson. This article seems to want nothing more than a bunch of grandstanding and security theater. Pointless.

      Also, I continue to be disappointed with the lame, juvenile insults that some posters like samadams use in pathetic attempts to respond to reasonable criticisms. welcome to the Internet, I guess. Room tenperature iqs all around.

      • ladylove

        yep, one moron, agreeing with another moron, now that truly is the height of intelligence.

      • truebearing

        gregg,

        If the IQs around here are romm temperature, you must keep yours in the freezer.

        • gregg

          Oh snap. The freezer!! Burnt!!11oneoneone

          Has anyone here achieved the maturity level of a fifth grader yet?

          • ladylove

            yes many of us do, you can only hope someday, far, far in the future, you may bring yourself up to a level still beneath us, but higher than you are now.

          • ladylove

            and I meant to add, many of us have already reached levels way beyond the 5th grade, both scholastically, and in life experience…

      • ladylove

        one question

        if you find us all so “lame and juvenile” why do you even bother with us?

        if all you want is someone to agree with everything you say, may I suggest politics daily, they cater to the left.

    • truebearing

      krjohnson,

      So, am I to assume you are throwing in with the non-sentient crowd? With all due respect, your comment is a jeremiad entirely disconnected from the point of the article. I’m more than a little surprised you went off on such a tangential and irrelevant rant. You are capable of much better.

      Your little mortality analysis was frankly ridiculous. You fail to understand 9/11, even remotely, and seem to live in a naive, insular world where distant events aren’t real if they don’t effect you directly. You fail to recognize the financial and psychological damage caused by 9/11, much less the causal relationship between the attack on New York and the subsequent wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. How is this possible? Get out of your ideology and into reality.

      You seem to think you can just ignore the FACTS that were presented regarding homegrown Muslim terrorism, which after all, was the topic. You seem to dismiss this growing threat despite the well documented admission of groups like the Muslim Brotherhood that the US is a target for their Islamic manifest destiny. If you knew anything about Islam, you’d know what extremes the Muslim jihadists will go to, though I would think 9/11 and the other attacks should have been enough to wake you up.

      It occurs to me that you are emulating the head-in-the-sand mentality of the Democrats, possibly out of fear, certainly as a result of denial. The see-no-evil, hear-no-evil strategy doesn’t have a real good track record of success when dealing with crises, and it won’t work here. I’d recommend you face this thing and learn more before you insult those who clearly possess a much clearer view of what is happening in this country, and the world.

      • krjohnson

        I “throw-in” with whoever I think is in the right. I believe that the anti-war leftists are only anti-war because they are anti-Bush and if you look at the history of anti-war movements over the past 100 years you will find that they almost always come from the right, not the left. It has been the left that has used the machinery of war to expand the state. LBJ, FDR and Wilson who forced an unwilling country into war to centralize power in an elite few. It was conservative Senator Robert A Taft, Republican lion of the Senate, the chief opponent of the New Deal, and a man I have enormous amount of respect for, who said:

        “The principal purpose of the foreign policy of the United States is to maintain the liberty of our people. Its purpose is not to reform the entire world or spread sweetness and light and economic prosperity to peoples who have lived and worked out their own salvation for centuries, according to their customs, and the best of their abilities.”

        This man would be, sadly, exiled from the modern Republican party as a traitor. Put into his own political rubber room as they have done with Ron Paul.

        I believe that, while you accuse me of minimizing the financial and psychological impact of 9-11 I would accuse you of ignoring completely the financial and psychological impact of a decade long war which we have no serious plans to end. A war in which, if the current president has his way, will see kids who were 3 years old on 9-11 fighting in the wilderness of Afghanistan 15,000 miles away from their home in America to prop up a corrupt government. Is it really justice to kill tens of thousands of Afghans in retaliation for an act of a small group of individuals acting in their country? Is it really necessary to send 5,000+ American servicemen to their deaths abroad because 3,000 die at home?

        We were right to go after Al-Queda and bring them to justice. I would have gone about it a little differently, but the intent was correct anyway. Al-Queda is no longer in Afghanistan. It’s time to stop nation building and come home.

        • truebearing

          I understand your views on foreign wars and nation building, and don’t categorically disagree. However, I form my opinion on any given foreign action based on the specific circumstances, not on being a neo-conservative vs conservative, or libertarian. My point to you was that the article was on Islamic insurgency in this country and the already worrisome results of radicalization of American Muslims. This is a problem in this country, as well as overseas, and it is growing under Obama’s enabling administration.

          The Republicans were right to investigate the issue, though I’ve never been a big fan of congressional investigations. If they didn’t do it, no one would, since Obama is encouraging the problem they were trying to expose. The circus atmosphere was 100% Democrat idiocy.

          Weinstein is absolutely correct about the Democrats and their refusal to face reality. They are so averse to truth it is scary and given the financial crisis we are in, and the growing problems with Islam, domestically and abroad, sticking one’s head in the sand is a profoundly stupid choice.

        • riseabove

          I agree that we should’ve done things much more covertly, especially since the attacks were not conventional. On the other hand, Taft may have re-evaluated his position had he lived through the threats we have today as opposed to fifty or sixty years ago.

    • ladylove

      ok

      you start out saying,

      with all due respect,(which is actually very little, if any)

      guess it is ok when you say things like that.

      and then go into a tirade, that since they secured cabin doors, we need not worry about another 9/11.

      now that is about as moronic as it gets, like muslim fanatics don’t have many, many other ideas on ways to kill us, Fort Hood could have been a whole hell lot worse a terrorist attack, had there not been civilian police there at the time. and as it has now been revealed they knew this man was dangerous, but he was muslim, and they did not want to step on toes.

      the governemnts number one responsibility is to keep it’s citizens safe. that is not a waste of time nor energy.

      that is why Arizona passed their own immigration laws, because despite having existing federal laws, the federal government refuses to enforce them.

      I don’t argue that I wish the wars overseas would come to an end. I was never for them to begin with, if you took the time you would know many of us were not for them. Obama was going to end them, so yell at him, not us.

      • krjohnson

        The number one duty of the US government is not to keep us safe, it is to secure our liberty. That is written in the Declaration of Independence. I would say all of these war on terror programs like the PATRIOT Act, the wars, the Department of Homeland Security, etc. are not helping to secure our liberty but instead impeding it.

  • gregg

    i think the two problems with articles are:

    (1) the lame zingers: for example — “What Americans will see is a relatively serious Republican Party investigating what any sentient being – and many non-sentient beings – know is a problem, which is the threat of Islamist radicalization” — what teh hell?

    (2) the lack of context for this hearing, or any specifics related to it, or why any of it matters. honestly, i learned nothing from this article other than that there was some hearing and that democrats apparently did not talk much about muslims. rather than using vague references to the hearing as a springboard to just talk about whatever you think about Islamic extremism, it might be better to talk about what, specifically, you would want congressional democrats to have done in this hearing. grandstand? demand legislation? what kind of legislation? etc.

    That’s a real analysis. This is just hot air

    • californiacitizen

      I completely disagree. I think it was a good and valid article about good and valid hearings–which were needed.

      You are entitled to your opinion, but mine is that you are either ignorant or a committed leftie.

      • gregg

        You can’t just say “good and valid hearings are needed” and claim it is a solution to anything. You might as well say “Democrats and Republicans need to come together and do the right thing about Islam.” Ok … well.. what IS the right thing?

        That’s the role of a real analysis — to tell us what the right thing is. Not to tell us to talk about it in a hearing (congressional hearings, by the way, are not known for being the most useful endeavors anyway).

        • ladylove

          well the article did say meet the blind, deaf, and the dumb, and here you are.

          • pink

            Oh there you are dearie, making it personal again and spreading more of the love and compassion you told me you are proud of.

        • truebearing

          gregg,

          You’re blathering nonsensically. Let me give you a tip on how to look much smarter than you do so far…..stop posting.

          • gregg

            You seem intent to hurl anonymous insults rather than make any real point. It is amusing but kind of depressing at the same time.

          • pink

            He always does that when he comes in contact with someone more erudite than he is.

          • truebearing

            gregg,

            It seems to me that you were hurling insults at everyone posting here, so you are not only a moron, you are a hypocritical moron.

            Poink,

            No one thinks you are erudite. They think you are irritating, and they are right. Maybe you and gregg should get together and spawn a fence post, or something.

      • ladylove

        I agree, and he is both

  • macombman

    With Japan and the Middle east in such turmoil is now the time for President and Michelle Obama to travel to Latin America? A funny but sad video.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pQzZ8-htJc

    • ladylove

      and it is a pleasure trip.

      yep we know where his priorities lie.

  • holeinthehull

    I believe the Democrats are not blind,deaf,and dumb by any stretch of the imagination. Democrats are grandstanding for the hearts of muslims around the country. They want to be seen as the party that “cares and understands” the “peoples” plight. The democrats will sell their own mother down the river for a vote and a dash of power. Liberals know their ideas suck ducks but they are intent on cobbling together every disenfranchised minority from coast to coast by playing to their different needs,complaints, and whining about their position in society. People in this country who believe that the Constitution of our country is worth every drop of blood that has been spilled for it need to rise up in 2012 and vote the rest of these idiots and rinos out of office.
    holeinthehull.com

  • oletech

    I am waiting for a replay of the hearings on C-Span so that I can tape it. I want family and friends see the attempt by the Democrats to turn the hearings into a Civil Rights forum by having mostly African American Democrats on the commission There has been little reference to the hearings by the media including Fox News. I wonder why that is so?

    • SamAdams25

      Oh, by all means do. Shelia Jackson-Lee puts on a performance that makes the Charlie Sheen interviews look calm and rational. Are the people of Houston just addicted to humiliation?

  • SAC crewdog

    Democrats are not dumb, as evidenced by the fact that they never shut up and look around themselves at this silly thing we call “Reality.” Ignorant (unknowing) and stupid (unwilling or unable to learn,) deaf and blind, certainly, but not dumb.

  • genetics73

    jmk1502,

    I said before and I will repeat it: everyone is entitled to a little stupidity now and then, but you have abused the privilege. Go back under the rock from under which you crawled. You are – simply put – a hateful creature; you would thrive under Stalin, running concentration camps.

  • TrishaD

    I just had a relative visit our home and her comment was “there is no way Obama wins in 2012 – everybody knows what kind of change he meant now! Even the blacks in my area are saying he is worse than Bush and they are not going to vote for him either!” Have you ever heard sweeter words? We have to get this guy OUT of the White House!!