Politics

Sen. Scott Brown calls Republican spending cuts ‘irresponsible’

Photo of Chris Moody
Chris Moody
Contributor

Dear Senators Reid, McConnell, Conrad, Sessions, Inouye and Cochran:

Since the beginning of the 112th Congress, the House and Senate have been seeking common ground to finish the appropriations work for FY 2011.  Sadly, rather than reaching a workable, bi-partisan solution to responsibly address our staggering deficit, we are repeatedly given a false choice between CR proposals that either don’t go far enough to reduce federal spending and proposals that set the wrong priorities that would disproportionately affect low-income families and seniors, while doing little to address critical, long-term issues.

I am disappointed that despite passing six different FY 2011 Continuing Resolutions, each with the understanding that passage would move bi-partisan negotiations further along, that we are once again faced with the likelihood of a government shutdown.  A government shutdown absolutely serves no purpose and is in no one’s best interests.  I stand ready to work with each of you, to do what it takes—and to put politics aside—and work on behalf of a greater good to ensure that Congress reach a bi-partisan compromise for FY 2011 and avoid a government shutdown.

Our collective work begins by having a clear understanding of the seriousness of our budget crisis and what is at stake if we fail to address it.  We can all agree that we simply cannot continue on this reckless, unsustainable course.  Reducing and eliminating needless spending and programs are appropriate, but a wholesale reduction in spending, without considering economic, cultural, and social impacts is simply irresponsible. We must also be mindful that many of the proposed spending reductions would disproportionately affect the neediest among us, including housing and heating assistance.  Likewise, some of the proposed cuts would be economically counterproductive, negatively impacting our ability to innovate and invest in research and development.

Deficit reduction is a necessary goal for our country.  But deficit reduction should not be achieved in isolation of our priorities as a government and a society.  I believe that responsible and meaningful bi-partisan support must be found and forged if we are to achieve long-term fiscal stability.  I intend to be a part of the discussions and the solutions for how to move our country forward, without eliminating programs that are successful, cost-effective, or critical to the livelihood of the neediest among us.

Thank you for your consideration.

Very respectfully,

Scott P. Brown

United States Senator

  • edwin schrodinger

    Brown is absolutely correct. We need to focus on creating jobs. Reducing the deficit is an important long term goal but we should not risk destroying the whole economy just to reduce it a little faster.

    An impressive number of cuts have already been agreed to. That is enough for now. Any further deficit reduction need to include higher taxes.

  • Pingback: KEEPING TABS ON SCOTT BROWN: MARCH 11-APRIL 8, 2011 | scottbrownsactivities

  • Dan

    Scott Brown, a bi-partisian asile reacher. Just what we don’t need.

  • pansycritter

    What an incredible disappointment this guy turned out to be. Stands for nothing apparently. Another 1-term RINO.

  • borntoraisehogs

    The retards who are not already boycotting for the disgusting semi-lesbo porn with Danica Patrick and that ignorant skank panty jock with the Billy Idol sneer, will not have a problem with some lout killing a giant magnificent threatened animal for fun, not food, not sport, just the thrill of killing.

  • Pingback: THE POLITICS OF ADULT “TODDLERS” | Citizen Tom