Why a vote on Planned Parenthood is important

Rumor has it that 41 Democratic senators signed a letter stating they would not allow a vote on ending federal funding of Planned Parenthood. Yet they haven’t released the letter. Why won’t they go public? And why don’t they want a recorded vote?

Perhaps they don’t want their cozy relationship with this wealthy and corrupt organization to be a matter of public record — especially when voters will be reminded in 2012, when 23 Democratic senators are up for re-election.

Planned Parenthood spent more than $1 million in 2010 to get their candidates into office. Once in office, these politicians funnel our tax dollars — $363 million in a single year — back to Planned Parenthood. That’s quite a return on their investment, and it’s all at our expense.

President Obama made it clear in closed-door negotiations with Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) that he would not relent on funding Planned Parenthood. He was willing to shut down the federal government rather than stop the flow of government money to the largest abortion provider in the country — despite revelations that Planned Parenthood partnered with men who appeared to be sex traffickers, lawsuits filed against the abortion group because it covered up the rapes of girls by adult men, and the discovery that its clinics overbilled by millions of dollars.

Planned Parenthood reported to the IRS that it made $1.1 billion in 2009. One-third of it came from tax dollars. It paid Cecile Richards, its president, $385,000 in salary and benefits. Other executives received hefty salaries — and that’s for the national office. The local affiliates have also reported generous salaries.

Even women who feel indebted to Planned Parenthood because they got cheap health care should wonder about the group’s executives getting rich from funding intended to help poor women.

For all their bluster about providing women’s health care, it turns out that Planned Parenthood does not offer comprehensive health care for women or men. While other clinics and doctors, including government-subsidized ones, provide medical care for the whole body, Planned Parenthood focuses only on sex organs. And even then it does not offer complete care, but rather care limited to sex-related diseases, manual breast exams (not mammograms), and ending pregnancies.

Even its oft-repeated statistic that abortion comprises only three percent of its services can’t be believed. Fewer than 20,000 clients out of three million got non-abortion services from Planned Parenthood. Clearly they inflate the numbers.

In Washington State, Planned Parenthood got caught overbilling the government by requiring its poorest patients to return for multiple unnecessary visits, billing for each visit. (Planned Parenthood opposes 24-hour waiting periods for abortions, arguing that it’s a burden on poor women to travel more than once to a clinic.) It also charged separately for an antibiotic used in abortion procedures that was bundled with other medicines.

The reason America faces a fiscal crisis is due in large part to irresponsible politicians with spending habits bigger than our bank accounts. Voters will remember the politicians who spent our money on kickbacks to the corrupt Planned Parenthood.

Wendy Wright is President of Concerned Women for America, the nation’s largest public policy women’s group.

  • Pingback: Why a Vote on Planned Parenthood is Important « Concerned Women for America

  • elyriaohio

    It’s just amazing how people can lose focus on what our country needs now, and has been promised by both parties, JOBS. Do we really have the attention span of gold-fish? (Oh, and this article is silly.”Planned Parenthood only focuses on SEX ORGANS!” – Well, Duh.)

  • Diverduck69

    I don’t understand these nubers: “Fewer than 20,000 clients out of three million got non-abortion services from Planned Parenthood.”

    I understand PP does about 330,000 abortions a year. If the three million clients is annually, then ten percent get abortions … how can you say 2,880,000 others are getting abortion services? If the 3 million is over a number of years, are we really supposed to believe that only 20,000 get non-abortion services?

    Or, what are “abortion services”? Do they include considering, but not getting an abortion?

    I am not a support of taxpayer funding for PP, but I don’t understand how these numbers can be correct, please explain.

  • lamecherry

    I noticed that the DC had two women posting on Planned Parenthood and no one cares enough to even comment. That alone should be a bow tie asked for commentary.

    The solution to American Genocide is not votes Wendy Wright. The solution is for the GOP to stand up for “women’s rights” by the Democratic playbook.

    As Planned Parenthood is part of the billion dollar rich class, tax it into oblivion to make it not profitable.

    As Planned Parenthood murders babies who sometimes need a double murder in surviving a botched aborticide in the womb, make Planned Parenthood legally and criminally responsible for these babies. When they live, make PP libel for paying for this person to their retirement which would cost millions. When the babies die, make them criminally responsible in these butchers will go to prison.

    Finally, make the aborticide industry responsible for all the psychological, scarred wombs and increased breast cancer conditions.
    Smoking kills they say, well we know that aborticide ends life of children and women, so make the profitable industry pony up for their profits.

    See when one makes things expensive, you take away profit and then liberals are not so in favor of backing it. When you put people into prison for criminal malpractice in botching aborticides, then they do not have such passion to make money off of this genocide.