MSNBC: Minorities hit hardest by iPhone tracking technology

Victim politics meets Big Brother-style technology, who would have thunk it?

Friday on MSNBC’s daytime programming, host Thomas Roberts explained that in the wake of revelations the iPhone tracks your movements with its operating software, minorities, specifically blacks and Latinos are most vulnerable, since they use their cell phones more than whites according to a Nielsen study.

“Alright, so one day after learning of a hidden iPhone feature that tracks your every single move, there’s new concern that tracking technology purchased by police can lead to racial profiling,” Roberts said. “You are looking at what’s called the ‘Universal Forensic Extraction Device.’ It can copy the entire content of a cell phone including text messages, contacts, GPS data and do it in just minutes. Michigan State Police purchased this device, though we don’t know how exactly they’re using it but civil liberties groups worry that the device endangers the privacy rights of blacks and Latinos. A Nielsen study shows blacks talk on average twice as much each month on their cell phones as white counterparts.”

David Wilson, founder and managing editor for MSNBC’s explained how the so-called “Universal Forensic Extraction Device” technology works.

“The manufacturer of the device claims they’re currently being used in 60 countries,” Wilson said. “We know that they are compatible with up to 3,000 different cell phone models. So, you know, whether you have an iPhone, whether you have another cell phone, this device works with those phones. It can wipe information or swipe information, even if you deleted your text messages. It can detect that – your e-mails, you know, from your GPS system, Web browser. So, you know, it can pretty much gather a lot of information if you’ve been using the phone over a couple of months.”

And as Wilson explained, minorities are most susceptible to this technology because they’re racially profiled by law enforcement and it is legal based on a California Supreme Court ruling earlier this year.

“Well, look, you know, a lot of African-Americans and Latino-Americans are victims of racial profiling,” Wilson said. “We know that, you know we’re using these phones and are using the devices more frequently. So, this raised a huge issue. California Supreme Court just recently ruled that police officers can swipe or can take information from your cell phones upon arrest. So, we know that just by nature of the fact that we are stopped more, that we’re arrested more, that we’re going to be subject to this sort of technology more.”


YouTube Preview Image

Wilson argued the use of this technology deserved scrutiny for that reason.

“Well, I think they’re looking at, look, this is potentially a violation of privacy, right?” he continued. “Police officers need a warrant to go inside your home. There’s no warrant, you know, if you’re looking at the California Supreme Court case – there’s no warrant necessary for this. So a lot of folks are looking at this saying, look, this is something where we need to make a stand here and protect people’s right to privacy.”

  • Pingback: Apple Tracks Our Every Move — Blacks, Hispanics Suffer Most | News Patriot

  • libelung

    A. How is it the “poor” can afford a $300.00 “smart”phone?
    B. The tracking algorithm does not care if you are talking on the phone or not. If the phone is on, with and moving, it’s tracking your movements, even with zero talk minutes on it.
    C. Thus the entire premise of this “story” is false.
    D. Why doesn’t MSNBC just state their intentions of white-bashing up front instead of attempting this thinly-disguised effort?

    • RationalRabbit

      Where is the word “poor” in this report. I must have missed that.

      I believe the gist was concerning illegal access to personal information (IE: the ability of a police department to download your contact information, text messages, audio messages, e-mail and whatever else you have on your cell phone.) The California Supreme court has ignored the fact that this is illegal. This is what we used to call “illegal search and seizure.

      The guest (although he has a good point and I can safely say those who disagree have never been the victims of profiling), in my opinion, should not be making his point a race issue, but, rather, a citizen’s rights issue, which it is.

      Let me explain to you how these things work: The broadcaster does a news story on a particular subject, or a particular subject is in the current fly-by-night public interest, and Joe Blow from some organization contacts the news department with an opinion to expound. If Joe is articulate enough to put on the air, it saves the producer from spending time to find someone who may be more credible on the subject. So he has his/her bird in the bush for that segment and moves on. Time is money. Especially in the profit-oriented cable news industry.

      What do you see as the premise of this story?

      “White-bashing”? I am really curious as to how you extract that accusation from this story.

  • Pingback: Privacy Concerns Over iPhone, Android Data Sharing Could Squelch iPhone 5 Features | The iPhone 5 News Blog

  • Pingback: MSNBC: The iPhone is Racist | Jason Poblete

  • voted against carter

    I just LOVE how the LEFT is ABLE to SPIN EVERYTHING into a

    ” WHOUGH to the POOR and DISADVANTAGED MINORITY’s bleeding hearts

    Stupid libratards.”

    Oh, and to I_Walk_Alone,… Me thinks you might be referring to YOURSELF.

    I make a living with Apple products (or USE to BEFORE Barry took over).

    AND I do NOT vote for any DumbOcRATS

    AND for the Record AL GORE is a self serving as* * OLE and a SCAM artist.