Rep. McCarthy introducing national gun control legislation following Sen. Schumer’s lead

A House bill that could drastically overhaul the nation’s gun control laws and strengthen federal power over states’ handling of individuals’ background checks is expected to be introduced today by New York Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, The Daily Caller has learned.

McCarthy is expected to drop the Fix Gun Checks Act of 2011 — a  near-identical companion to that of fellow New Yorker Chuck Schumer’s Senate bill — according to sources familiar with the legislation.

A draft of the bill obtained by TheDC makes clear that McCarthy’s legislation significantly mirrors Schumer’s much-publicized bill and would make three significant changes to current national gun laws. McCarthy’s proposed fixes include gun-control advocates’ long-sighted target in the national firearms debate — closing major “loopholes” of the milestone Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act.

Like its Senate companion, the House bill would also increase penalties for states that do not comply with the NICBC’s current requirements. States that do not make available the data needed to assess those who are or may be prohibited from possessing firearms could face reductions in the amount of federal crime-fighting funds they receive.

Another major provision of both bills focuses on the mental health issues of those seeking to possess firearms.

Apart from further defining and stipulating who qualifies as a “mental defective” both bills call for the development of mental health assessment plans for institutes for higher learning. Both bills would require federally funded colleges to develop a plan for the institutes to address risks posed by students who appear to need mental health help. Colleges must have a mental health “team” ready to assess potentially dangerous students as well as procedures in place for making voluntary and involuntary mental health referrals.

“Here we go again,” said National Rifle Association spokesman Alexander Arulanandam. “Rather than focusing her efforts on going after criminals [or] focusing her efforts on getting more information on ATF’s Fast and Furious program, [McCarthy is] opting to put more stringent regulations on law-abiding people.”

The NRA said that most criminals, especially the mental health cases like that of the Ft. Hood shooter Nidal Hasan and alleged Arizona gunman Jared Loughner make it through the cracks because current laws already in place are simply not being followed. Further restrictions on those law-abiding citizens who may have received some form of mental health treatment are being further punished.

“It’s too bad that this bill would put the burden on innocent people who are not a threat of society,” said Arulanandam, whose comments, like other 2nd Amendment advocates are in response to inquiries by TheDC, before obtaining a full copy of McCarthy’s draft bill. “Most people go through traumatic periods during their life and may seek some help and that person has never exhibited signs of being a threat to themselves or others. If that disqualifies them, that seems unreasonable … to say that that person cannot own a firearm.”

The legislation in both the House and the Senate represent just the latest reemergence of the national firearms debate following the Jan. 6 shootings in Tuscon, in which than a dozen were injured including Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, who is still recovering from her traumatic brain injuries. On March 13, President Obama wrote an Arizona Daily Star Op-ed, calling for a “common sense” discussion over gun laws and the phrase was echoed by Democratic politicians, as well as New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who is head of the gun-control group Mayors Against Illegal Guns.

Two days after Obama’s op-ed, Schumer — along with McCarthy, Bloomberg and several other leading Democrats — held a press conference in front of the Capitol to push for more gun-control legislation. At the time, McCarthy indicated she was days away from introducing her companion piece. As the weeks went by, McCarthy’s office said it was carefully reviewing the legislation and listening to various concerns.

McCarthy appears to have taken some of those concerns to heart. Conspicuously absent from the Representative’s legislation is Schumer’s controversial proposal to ban the possession of firearms to anyone who’s been arrested, but not convicted, of a drug-related crime in the past five years.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Charles-U-Farley/100000980295340 Charles U. Farley

    It’s the 21st Century McCarthyism. Let’s hope SHE is as vilified as Joe was

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Charles-U-Farley/100000980295340 Charles U. Farley

    ANOTHER moron heard from. Moonbats MUST GO.

  • steve001968

    There is no ‘gun show loophole’. Politicians are just upset that people have the right to sell their property as they see fit. NICS is a joke anyway. Out of all the denials (most of which are erroneous) less than 1% ever result in prosecution. Why? Because 1. Most NICS denials are false denials and where a prosecution is not sustainable and 2. The purpose of NICS is not to deter criminals, it’s to force citizens to ask permission to exercise a constitutional right (which means it is no longer a right). The strategy is simply to add and add to the list of prohibited persons until virtually everyone is prohibited. Now Chucky Schumer has introduced legislation to strip 2nd amendment rights from people simply arrested for a drug offense. Legislation has also been previously introduced to add those on the terrorist watch list. Who’s on the watch list and how do they get there? Good luck finding out, it’s a secret but one thing is for sure they didn’t get there by being convicted of a crime by a jury of their peers. So much for innocent until proven guilty. Now it’s the other way around. Next it will be anyone convicted of a traffic violation and then anyone cited for a traffic violation because that pesky due process thing is just too inconvenient. Of course what the politicians and their room temp IQ’s can’t grasp but any criminal can is that NICS relies on easily counterfeited ID cards. When it comes to NICS, you are who you say you are, if you want to beat it just use fake ID. Simple as that.

  • ImpeachThatLyingPunk

    OF COURSE, she’s stupid… she’s got a “D” at the end of her name…

  • Glockslinger

    Legislators are one-trick ponies, and like the proverbial man with only a hammer who then sees every problem as a nail, McCarthy thinks she can fix anything with legislation. BAD LOGIC ALERT: Criminals won’t follow the law, so any law you make will only be followed by the law abiding! So ask yourself: if this law had been in effect, would it have stopped the Tucson shooting? Or Fort Hood? Or Virginia Tech? The answer: NO. Less than 1/10th of a percent of recovered “crime guns” were purchased at gun shows. Plus, making laws for gun shows won’t prevent private sales to anyone via the internet, newspaper or community bulletin board. The solution: provide private sellers with a special one-time access to the NICS background check system. Why don’t they propose this? Because their true goal is to shut down gun shows. This ain’t about preventing crime. This is politics.

    • Iver

      Why give any one access to the NICS system. There is no need for it. The government already knows who should not have a gun. They have a list in Washington DC. That is how the NICS system works. Rather than having good people prove to the government they are not criminals, why not put a flag on criminals drivers licenses or state issued photo ID cards saying “Firearms Restricted” or some such. That way as a private seller I could simply look at the buyers license and tell if they are banned from owning firearms. The same holds for gun dealers. That way it is the criminals who are imposed upon and not law abiding citizens. Have a mandatory 5 year sentence for using a drivers license or ID card that has been altered or is false to avoid the “Firearms Restricted” endorsement. And we save money by doing away with the NICS reporting system.