The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller

Krauthammer argues for Paul Ryan in 2012, or GOP will ‘sink’ on Medicare

On Tuesday night the Republican Party suffered a defeat in a GOP stronghold in a special congressional election in New York. Is that a sign of things to come for the Republican Party now that its opponents have managed to make Wisconsin Republican Rep. Paul Ryan’s budget proposal a major political issue?

According to syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer, the answer depends on whether Paul Ryan decides to enter the race to the White House or not. On Wednesday night’s “Special Report,” Krauthammer explained the Democratic Party has so far successfully demagogued the issue.

“Look, [today's budget vote] is a way to say that what Clinton had said – that Democrats look as if they’re going to immediately demagogue this is completely true,” Krauthammer said. “It isn’t only that it is used to win the special election in New York State, but it’s being used in the Senate to make senators go on the record and thus embarrass them in the future.”

Although there were other circumstances involved in the GOP defeat on Tuesday, Krauthammer said it shouldn’t have been that close in a rock-solid Republican district. But the GOP now owns Ryan’s Medicare proposal, he said.

“Look, I would extrapolate and I would acknowledge that even though ["Tea Party" ballot candidate] Jack Davis might have had an effect on this election but this election should never have been close. It’s been a Republican district forever,” he said. “It was about Medicare and the Republicans lost on the Medicare. There’s no hiding from it. The problem is the entire party essentially has endorsed the Ryan plan and you are stuck with it. There’s no running away.”

However, just because the Republican Party lost the special election, it doesn’t mean it is completely a lost cause for the party going into 2012. Krauthammer said the GOP can make it a winning issue. But to do that, he said, it requires Ryan running as a presidential candidate to expertly explain his policy proposal.

“People are now writing, ‘Well Ryan — the boomlet for Ryan to a candidate is over,’” he continued. “I would say exactly the opposite. You now own this. Get the one man who can explain it, argue it and actually change minds on this. You need leadership on this or otherwise the Republicans are going to sink on this.”

Watch:



  • aaron

    Legislators do not belong in the executive office.

    • soopermexican

      thats one the stupidest comments ive ever seen in a forum. The founders specifically designed the age limits in the legislative to usher house reps to the senate, and senators to the executive. duh.

  • cramos

    Paul Ryan is not just a one trick pony….his other great qualities are that he speaks with authority of subject and is a leader. Both qualities absent in Obama.

    I hope he runs ………….he is his own man….sincere and humble….whose love of country cannot be questioned

  • David Farrar

    Krauthammer still doesn’t get it. What NY-26 represents is what will happen in the 2012 presidentail race should Tea Pary supporters find themselves without a clearly defined candidate.

    ex animo
    davidfarrar

    • soopermexican

      the KROWT rocks. Not sure a Paul Ryan run is feasible at this point, but the GOP should at least start knocking on the Dems for not being able to pass anything for two years while our side is trying to provide solutions.

  • Joe Steel

    Krauthammer says: “Get the one man who can explain it, argue it and actually change minds on this.

    Be careful, Dr. Krauthammer. Nothing good for Republicans can come from changing minds. The truth is not their friend. When the truth about the Ryan Plan to Gut Medicare is examined, it will change minds from support to opposition.

    The Ryan Plan to Gut Medicare forces seniors to place their health into the hands of insurance companies, the same insurance companies who won’t insure them now or want huge premiums for the insurance and who will try to deny any claims the beneficiaries file. Why would seniors do that when the system we have now covers most of their health care costs at a very small price without any possibility of being rejected?

  • gringott

    Yes, let us run a guy who never met a bailout he wouldn’t vote for.
    Cut individual benefits, but bail out banks to the tune of trillions of dollars. Now if he proposed to jail banksters and cut bennies, ok. But he is not proposing that. He proposes shifting the cost of health care to the states in order to kick the can down the road for a few more years.

    It is becoming increasingly clear that this corrupt system must totally fail, it is not possible to reform it.

  • ChickFight

    HEY REPUBS! STOP RUNNING AWAY FROM DEMOCRAT LIES AND DEMAGOGUERY!! STAND AND FIGHT!!!

  • krjohnson

    Paul Ryan would be an interesting candidate for sure. It’s hard to imagine a congressman becoming President, but it is possible.

    It’s not like any of the candidates disagree with Paul Ryan’s budget because it cuts too much (except maybe Newt Gingrich, who doesn’t even agree with himself depending on the day, time, and what he had for lunch), the candidates who would say they disagree with it say that it doesn’t cut enough! The problem is that none of these candidates have endorsed a specific plan that is actually being debated and voted on. They have ideas, and they have plans laid out, but none of them are being voted on.

    If Paul Ryan wants to jump in and make his case, I think the country would be better off for having that debate. BUT I think a better way would be for one of the candidates who is running to specifically endorse the Paul Ryan plan and argue for it. Then, if he gets the nomination Paul Ryan would be a great, but not mandatory, VP pick.

    Dr. K says, “Get the one man who can explain it, argue it and actually change minds on this.”

    Well, I’ve never been one for demagogues. I think there are plenty of people out there that could argue for this. Get one of them in the race.

  • AnnD

    Hmpf. After basically sticking a gosh darn stake in Newt’s heart over his take on Ryan’s plan a couple of weeks ago, he is admitting that the damn thing is not something that can be sold so easily to the public. Which is what Newt’s point was orginially before every “conservative” pundit and tea party ‘patriot’ literally trashed him for having the freaking guts to say it!

    Now, he wants Ryan to go on a selling tour.

    Just fix the plan. Tell everyone, that after the Senate rejected it, it was determined there were some things that needed a little more tweaking or WE FREAKING LOSE 2012, that’s it.

    • des1

      Newt’s intent is irrelevant. He’s a public speaker and said something mind-numbingly stupid. He has now admitted it and apologized. His Presidential run is over (not that it was ever a serious threat to begin with). I really like to watch Newt wipe the floor with Liberal reporters, but after attacking Clinton for wanting to slow the growth of expenditures in Medicare, doing a commercial with Nancy Pelosi about the dangers of global warming, and calling Ryan’s plan “Right-wing social engineering,” he will be lucky to approach Ron Paul numbers in 2012.

  • libertyatstake

    Hey, if Chuckie gets Paul R. to run, that’s a good thing for sure.

    d(^_^)b
    http://libertyatstake.blogspot.com/
    “Because the Only Good Progressive is a Failed Progressive”