The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller

Why Marco Rubio might turn down that ‘arranged marriage’

Senator Marco Rubio recently said on Fox News that he’s “not going to be the vice presidential nominee” in 2012.

I may have been the first person to float the idea that he should run for president himself in 2012. That’s not going to happen, of course, but a lot of pundits (most forcefully Dick Morris, who recently described the future GOP ticket as “an arranged marriage” where “the bride has been chosen”) insist he should be the Republican vice presidential nominee.

This is not an absurd idea. While I am a bit skeptical of the notion that Rubio’s Cuban-American background would automatically deliver a significant bloc of Latino votes, there are plenty of reasons why the young, eloquent and intelligent Senator from Florida would be a major attribute to a presidential ticket.

The case will eventually be made, of course, that Rubio has to do this for the good of the nation and for the good of America — that it is his patriotic duty for America. It is hard to say “no” to that. But the question Marco Rubio must also answer is — what is best for Marco Rubio?

It is when that question is asked that one begins to think Rubio might be wise to politely reject the overture.

Whether or not the ticket wins, Rubio would be forced to adopt many of the principal’s issues. This means he would risk losing direct control over his brand and his message (as did Sarah Palin). But there are also other dangers for those who play “Robin” to someone else’s “Batman.” Playing second fiddle can sometimes undermine a person’s image as a strong, independent leader. For example, though George H.W. Bush won the presidency in 1988, he never got out from under the shadow of Ronald Reagan.

What is more, any “baggage” that is accumulated during the political campaign or administration (should the ticket win) may impact the running mate’s future chances. The Lewinsky scandal, for example, created unique challenges for then-Vice President Al Gore in 2000. George H.W. Bush had to answer questions about Iran-Contra.

To be sure, sometimes a veep slot can propel a politician to the presidency. Obviously, this sometimes happens when a president dies or resigns from office. And it can sometimes also be a stepping stone to electoral success. It (eventually) worked for Richard Nixon (Eisenhower’s veep) and for George H. W. Bush. But on the other hand, Walter Mondale (Carter’s veep) and Al Gore were not able to parlay the position into a promotion. There are no guarantees.

What is more, some rising stars have crashed after the experience. Dan Quayle was once a bright, young, up-and-coming U.S. Senator. George H.W. Bush did his career no favors when he selected him as his running mate.

This is all a long way of saying it is debatable whether or not accepting such an offer is prudent — especially for a senator who already seems poised to have a bright future in his own right.

  • Sandy E

    Marco Rubio, in my opinion, is the best newbie to join the Senate this year. He is still young, and I wouldn’t mind seeing him finish his Senate term, run for Governor of Florida, and then go for the presidency. He will have accumulated all of the experience he needs, particularly Governor experience. I agree with the author, Rubio has a very bright political future, and he doesn’t need to accomplish it off of anyone else’s coattails.

  • Adam D

    Marco Rubio would be the best VP choice for the Republican nominee. Sure there are cases of VPs having baggage tied to their predecessor. But if you look at previous VPs who failed to become President most of their flaws had nothing to do with the previous President. Mondale said on national he was going to raise taxes, this is after Reagan had cut them and there was an economic boom. His landslide defeat really had nothing to do with being associated with the failed Presidency of Carter. Dan Quayle was just a political light weight and had Bush and Kemp gotten along well would never have been chosen. The fact that Bush (41) raised taxes and betrayed the Reagan Revolution really had nothing to do with Quayle’s failed Presidential campaign in 2000, he was just a weak candidate. The only candidate who can somewhat claim he lost due to baggage tied to his predecessor is Gore. Bush (43) ran on a campaign to restore integrity to the office of the President. But let’s not forget that Gore had a few bad debate performances, remember is sighs and invading Bush’s space?

  • Rocketman

    Marco Rubio has plenty of time to gain some much-needed knowledge and experience.

    I sincerely wish that Republicans would stop glomming onto the seemingly endless list of the “next great leader”.
    (think: Scott Brown, Chris Christie, Sarah Palin, etc.)
    Let’s be PRAGmatic instead of DOGmatic for a change, eh GOP? We are ALL sadly aware that candidates, announced and unannounced, will say just about anything to get elected.

    Smart’n Up

    ~(Ä)~