The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller
UNION CITY, NJ - MARCH 28: (Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images) UNION CITY, NJ - MARCH 28: (Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)  

Federal home ownership policy halves Hispanics’ equity

Photo of Neil Munro
Neil Munro
White House Correspondent

For 16 years prior to 2009, the federal government tried to boost home ownership rates among minorities and immigrants. Instead, it managed to cut in half the median value of real estate equity held by Hispanic homeowners.

The median value of Hispanic-owned homes fell from nearly $100,000 in 2005 to barely $49,000 by 2009, according to a new report from the Pew Research Center. Meanwhile, Hispanics’ home ownership rate returned to the 1999 level.

The massive financial impact on Hispanics was even greater than the impact on blacks, whose median home equity declined by one-fifth to $59,000. Median home-equity among whites also declined by one-fifth, down to $95,000.

The Pew report, released July 26, is built on the Census Bureau’s Survey of Income Program and Participation.

Hispanics were hit hard because many families bought homes shortly before the decade-long property bubble peaked in 2006, said Rakesh Kochhar, the chief author of the Pew report.

The bubble was created from 1995 onward when the federal government, the real estate industry and the financial sector worked together to ease poor people’s access to credit, increase the number of homes sold to poorer people, and spread the risk of default by low-income home buyers, especially in the southwest.

When the bubble burst, Hispanic households’ average net worth was slashed by 66 percent, from $18,359 in 2005 to $6,325 in 2009. “Hispanics derived nearly two-thirds of their net worth in 2005 from home equity and are more likely to reside in areas where the housing meltdown was concentrated,” said the Pew report.

The bursting of the bubble was accompanied by an economic slowdown that forced massive layoffs in the construction industry, where many Hispanics had found work, said Kochhar. The result, said the report, was “a 42% rise in median levels of debt they carried in the form of unsecured liabilities,” such as credit cards.

The massive loss of equity and wealth then spread to Wall Street.

Many risky mortgages sold to low-income buyers had been subsequently passed on to Wall Street banks, which then used them as collateral for large-scale financial bets. Wall Street stock values crashed in 2008, once the banking industry recognized that many of the risky mortgages would never be paid off.

Officials working in the Clinton and George. W. Bush administrations pushed the federal policies spurring the boom that began in 1995.

In October 2002, for example, Bush hosted a White House Conference on Minority Homeownership and declared that he would try to close a minority “home-ownership gap.”

“We have a problem here in America because few than half of the Hispanics and half the African Americans own the home … by the end of this decade we’ll increase the number of minority homeowners by at least 5.5 million families,” Bush declared.

Bush’s policy was spurred by the promise of an economic boom from home building, but also by the hope that property-owning Hispanics would align themselves with the GOP. “Ownership of a home helps bring stability to neighborhoods … It helps people build up their own individual portfolio, provides an opportunity, if need be, for a mom or a dad to leave something to their child,” Bush said.

  • Alechango

    First, Mr. Sandos of the National Association of Hispanic Real Estate Professionals is misrepresented and his words taken out of context.  He was lamenting the fact that unscrupulous lenders made thousands of poorly underwritten, often fraudulent loans, to thousands of borrowers, including immigrants and Hispanics.  Such lenders often made low or no-income documentation loans in order to derive a greater profit from the making of such loans that were often accompanied by deceitful practices such as teaser rates that mushroomed over time and exorbitant repayment penalties.  The subsequent meltdown in Wall Street did not happen just because these loans were made to “poor” people but rather because deceitful and highly unregulated bad practices were also pervasive in Wall Street, serving only to make matters extremely worse. 

    Many Latino immigrants were the targets of such loans because many had good ‘thin file” credit scores and thus could be combined with the bad loans these lenders were originating in order to make the sale of mortgage-backed securities, of which these loans were a part, attractive since such loans ensured that these securities could be rated triple-A, when in fact, it included loans made toxic by the lenders and had nothing to do with borrowers who often qualified for conventional, safe, affordable loans but were lured into predatory loans.  The mere promotion of homeownership by government or the private sector had nothing to do with the real culprits of the economic mess:  greedy individuals who thought only of their own enrichment at the expense of others and the national economy.