Opinion

Why the USPS should be privatized

Photo of Tad DeHaven
Tad DeHaven
Budget Analyst, Cato Institute

The United States Postal Service has lost over $20 billion since 2006 and is projected to lose another $8 billion this year. Government Mail is about to max out its $15 billion line of credit with the U.S. Treasury, and it faces $66 billion in unfunded obligations due to excessive labor costs. With more and more people using email, sending text messages and paying their bills online, the Postal Service’s long-term prospects are undeniably bleak.

Although USPS management has been able to cut costs, the savings haven’t been nearly enough to stem the rising tide of red ink. If the USPS were a private business, it might be able adapt to the rapidly changing economic landscape and evolve into a viable commercial entity. But it’s not a private business — it’s a branch of the federal government. As a result, the USPS has been hopelessly hamstrung by constant meddling from politicians, as exemplified by the difficulty the USPS faces when trying to close post offices.

Postal management announced this week that it will weigh the closure of 3,700 of its 32,000 post offices, hoping to save $200 million a year. Those savings are miniscule compared to the $8 billion alone that the USPS will lose this year, but it’s a start.

Unfortunately, there’s a very good chance that those members of Congress whose districts will be affected by a post office closure will raise a stink. In 2009, for example, the USPS looked at closing 3,200 post offices. Following a congressional outcry, the number under consideration was reduced to a mere 140. Two years later, only 80 have actually been closed.

The USPS is required to provide services to all communities, including areas where post offices have low traffic and are not cost-effective. Before closing a post office, the USPS must provide customers with at least 60 days of notice before the proposed closure date, and any person served by the post office may appeal its closure to the Postal Regulatory Commission. The USPS cannot close a post office “solely for operating at a deficit.” That’s a problem because four out of five post offices are operating at a loss.

Can anyone seriously imagine any other business not being able to close a store or factory for “solely operating at a deficit”? That would be a recipe for bankruptcy. While the USPS is structured like a business — revenues from the sale of postal products are supposed to cover costs and it receives virtually no federal appropriations — Congress prevents it from actually operating like a private business by inhibiting its ability to reduce costs, improve efficiency or innovate.

Postal management is attempting to head off the inevitable congressional interference by creating “Village Post Offices” in the communities affected by the closings. Local businesses, such as pharmacies and grocery stores, would be allowed to offer postal products and services. This makes sense because whereas post offices used to generate almost all postal retail revenue, 35 percent is now generated through alternative channels like USPS.com, self-service kiosks and private stores.

Closing post offices is a small step towards cutting costs and “rationalizing” the retail network, which the USPS management recognizes as critical. However, that won’t be enough to overcome economic reality — let alone the control freaks in Congress. Ultimately, if the USPS is to continue operating like a business instead of becoming just another taxpayer-funded bureaucracy, Congress is going to have to hand the reins over to the private sector. That means privatizing the United States Postal Service.

Tad DeHaven is a budget analyst at the Cato Institute and co-editor of DownsizingGovernment.org.

  • Jess81

    The problem with the Post Office is that it’s one of the semi-private or psudo-government agencies like Freddy and Fannie. It was a BAD idea. The Post Office was mandated by the Constitution. It’s lost huge amounts of money because of UPS and FedEx, neither of which has to deliver mail to every address in the US. They skim off the profitable routes.

    The PO is like the military. Necessary for national security and if you think you can trust the internet to not be controlled by the government or the hackers, then you haven’t been paying attention. Those are the ONLY benefits I get from my taxes. National Defense and the Postal Service. The odd notion that the PO needed to make a profit came about around the same time the government decided it needed more money for the war on poverty.

    • wadesmith

      Article 1 section 8 states:
      The Congress shall have Power… To establish Post Offices and Post Roads;.
      This means the Congress is the only organ of the federal government that can do so. It also means the the number of Post Offices is up to the Congress. Congress could order that there be 1 post office in DC and privatize everything else. There is no Constitutional requirement that the federal government to mandate delivery of mail to every address in the US by federal means.

      Privatize the mail and let the market decide delivery costs. Why should the paid cost for all letter delivery be the same for all addresses in the USA?

  • robb32

    The financial issue the USPS faces is very real, due in part to many factors, including the downturn in the economy, and the fact that the USPS can no longer afford to support the glut of executive, and managerial positions it carries. Does it REALLY need 39 Vice Presidents making 300k each when the whole country needs but one, along with unapproved “favoritistic” consultant jobs it gives away to friends?
    But the real issue that the media is ignoring completely is that the USPS has been gouged by the Federal Govt since 1972, being overcharged to the tune of 75 BILLION dollars since that time to fund it’s retirees. Don’t get me wrong , being required to put away the cash to fund it’s retirees is a good thing, by the rate at which it has been forced to save is far above and beyond what ANY other entity is required to do. Do you really think Fedex or UPS could afford to operate at that loss? In addition, those entities have mutual contracts WITH the USPS for package and mail movement. So essentially, they are partners, not competitors.
    For example, out of the 8 billion it has lost, approximately 5-7.5 billion of it was taken off the top by Uncle Sam. There is a House bill to refund the overages from the past that will allow the USPS to operate in the black.
    By the way without those federal payments, the USPS operated in the black 7 of the last 8 financial quarters.