The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller

This has been a good week for Republicans in the polls

It’s been a good week for Republicans in the polls, despite being a rocky week in the debt ceiling talks. Old people, young people, moderate people — the GOP is gaining in multiple categories. While all eyes are on the GOP as it tries to wrangle votes on the Boehner plan, it’s worth looking at the trends that are working in the party’s favor.

Writing in The Wall Street Journal yesterday, Karlyn Bowman and Andrew Rugg of the American Enterprise Institute describe how “flower power” might be coming to the GOP’s aid. That is, boomers — the notoriously liberal children of the 60s — are growing more conservative and Republican. They’re not in the GOP’s pocket yet, but they’re definitely trending that way.

  • In 1971 as baby boomers were coming online as adults, 51% said they were Democrats compared to the 29% who claimed to be Republicans. Now, 48% are Republicans and 45% Democrats.
  • Ideologically, during the same time span, self-identified liberals dropped from 30% to 12% of this group, while conservatives rose from 21% to 46%. That’s quite a divide compared to a generation ago.
  • Compared to 18-to-24-year-olds, of whom 49% voted in 2008, 72% of people aged 55-64 voted. Clearly, a Republicanization of this age group would matter a lot next year.

This doesn’t mean the youth vote doesn’t matter. It does. Millennials are now America’s largest generation, depending on how you do the math.

And that’s where Michael Barone’s latest column comes in.

While acknowledging that the GOP still has a long way to go among Hispanics (and we all know how far apart African-Americans and the GOP are), Barone writes:

The Democratic edge in party identification among white Millennials dropped from seven points in 2008 to three points in 2009 to a one-point Republican edge in 2010 and an eleven-point Republican lead in 2011.

The change these younger folks thought they were seeking in 2008 has, as Barone points out, been “anything but hopeful.”

And that’s not all. What about independents? Well, Obama’s got plenty to worry about there, too.

Writing in The Weekly Standard a few days ago, Jay Cost tracks the numbers.

  • After beginning north of 60% among independents on Inauguration Day, Obama fell below 50% in the summer of 2009 and has “struggled to stay above 45%” since the winter of 2010.
  • No president in the past 40 years has been re-elected with less than 48% of the independent vote.

Assuming various scenarios about how Democratic the electorate will be in 2012, Cost calculates “under anything less than a very Democratic electorate, Obama’s support among independents has been too soft to secure reelection for nearly two years.” And the electorate is not showing signs of being very Democratic next year.

It gets better. Michael Barone has been on a roll this week calculating the relationship between presidential elections and votes for the preceding off-year House elections. Since 1996, there has been less than a 1% difference for Democrats.

  • JPalm

    That’s a big leap! I don’t share your opnion!
    I think that burned the Tea Party bridges!
    Third party, Obama gets second term!