The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller
 President Barack Obama speaks in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, Monday, Aug. 8, 2011. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)  

Obama again urges tax hikes to close U.S. debt gap

Neil Munro
White House Correspondent

President Barack Obama used his 10-minute White House speech today to cast blame on the tea party movement for Standard & Poor’s credit downgrade. In the speech, he again urged Washington legislators to approve a”grand bargain” that would trim federal spending, “adjust” entitlement programs and approve a “tax reform that will ask those who can afford it to pay their fair share.”

“The threat of default was used as a bargaining chip,” Obama said, without identifying any legislators or groups. That threat “has roiled the [stock] market, dampened consumer confidence, and slowed the pace of recovery,” he said.

The unnamed advocates are widely assumed to be the Republican legislators and their supporters in Tea Party movement who urged reductions in federal spending plans.

Standard & Poor’s downgraded the nation’s credit rating, the president added, “not so much because they doubted our ability to pay our debts if we make good decisions [but because] they doubted our political system’s ability to act.”

Obama seemed to agree, saying, “It is not a lack of plans or policies that is the problem. It is the lack of political will in Washington … [and] a refusal to put what’s best for the country ahead of self-interest, or party or ideology.”

GOP officials pushed back quickly. “Raising taxes is simply the wrong approach,” said a statement from Majority Leader John Boehner. “We passed a budget that would spend $6.2 trillion less than the President’s proposal; we passed a Cut, Cap, and Balance plan that would save trillions of dollars; and, with the Budget Control Act, we passed a meaningful down payment on deficit reduction – all without tax increases … providing economic certainty and creating an environment in which businesses can invest and jobs can flourish must remain our number-one focus,” he said.

“The markets have rendered their verdict on Barack Obama’s speech and it was not a good one,” according to a tweet from Reince Priebus, the chairman of the Republican National Committee.

Monday was the first trading day after the credit downgrade, and the Dow Jones index fell below 11,000 during Obama’s speech, before ending 635 points down for the day.

In March the Congressional Budget Office predicted that Obama’s 2012 budget request would, by 2021, add $9.5 trillion to the existing national debt of $14.3 trillion. GOP legislators opposed Obama’s spending plan, and won instead his signature on a debt ceiling deal that could trim projected spending by as much as $2.4 trillion over the next 10 years.

The first round of the debt ceiling deal identified $900 billion in cuts.

The second round of cuts is to be be identified by a “super committee” of 12 legislators.  It should not call for further cuts to defense and discretionary programs, Obama said, because “there is not much further we can cut in either of those categories.” Discretionary programs include police, education and research funding, some welfare programs, and most government agencies.

The 12-member committee should draft a tax-reform package that raises revenues, and should trim spending on federal health care programs so they can be preserved for the long run, Obama said. “I intend to present my own recommendations over the coming weeks on how we should proceed, and that committee will have this administration’s full cooperation,” he promised.

  • JLL

    That darn BO. Never met a tax he didn’t like.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DWFYZVGZP2GHEXEHSTTJLKVY5M Lu

    Raising taxes is Obama’s solution to EVERY problem.  When you spend money recklessly like he does, you need an unending stream of revenue.  The man doesn’t seem to realize that the American people don’t have the money to pay the extra taxes and that the rich will either leave the country and/or stop buying goods and services that are creating jobs.  He is blind to any solutions other than spending money we don’t have and raising taxes.

  • skspls

    Let’s see…If unemployment were down around 4%, would tax hikes be required?  Oh, yeah, it’s a tax and spend administration, at this point.  The major cause of this mess: Unemployment, Wall Street and overspending.

  • abderecho

    Mr. President, put a sock in it.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DWFYZVGZP2GHEXEHSTTJLKVY5M Lu

      Poor sock!

  • oldguy5

    How about we get the 50% of Americans not paying any tax to pay first. And while we are at it let’s make sure it pays the debt, not Odumbos friends and supporters.

  • Anonymous

    Obama still playing class warfare I’ll pay more when he pays more he got 12,500 back in taxes why didn’y he pay that to the debt service. That would be leading by example something he doesn’t do as he has no leadership skills what so ever. Then maybe he could get the 50% who pay nothing in taxes to pay just something and make his job czar’s company GE pay taxes instead of 0 and sending jobs to China. This man has nothing new to say except that it is never his policies fault or his it is always someone elses fault.

  • Notabot32

    I wager none of you idiots posting here have any idea how the US financial system works.  If we ONLY cut the deficit without increasing taxes we are forcing ourselves into a recession.  Obama’s plan to increase taxes (on people much wealthier than most of you, mind you) is the only way to get out of this S@#%hole without a huge recession.  The Tea Party does not have the interests of 99% of the American people at heart, you fools seem to think they do.  They have the interests of big oil, multibillionairres, and their defense contractors, thats IT.  400 people in this country have 60% of the money.  Are you one of those 400 people?  NO.  YOU SHOULD WANT HIGHER TAXES ON THE WEALTHY YOU IDIOTS.

    • oldguy5

      Your the idiot, everyone else here knows if taxes are raised Odumbo will just spend it on bigger govt and more social bullshit.

      But then again your probablyoneof his moochers.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_ELVVIKQBY6RG3FTED7NVM7OJEM JenChris

      The top 10
      percent of households in the U.S. pays 45.1 percent of all income taxes, you ignoramus.
      Then there’s Corporate Tax, Payroll Tax, State Tax, etc. Then come the
      cost of complying with all of the draconian government regulation. All to feed the indigent class who leech off them and the middle class who work for a living. There is not enough wealth in the world to sustain government spending at these levels let alone pay down our debt! Has it worked out for any socialist nation yet? You don’t want jobs – you want more welfare. Try getting a job or any of your needed household products from a poor man. WE want to make the poor rich – YOU just want to make the rich less rich and the poor to remain where they are so they keep voting Democrat. Your class envy is infantile.

      USA, HIGHEST TAXES IN THE WORLD:

      http://marklevinshow.com/goout.asp?u=http://www.taxfoundation.org/blog/printer/27134.html

      EAT THE RICH: WHAT THE FED SPENDS CAN’T BE SUSTAINED:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=661pi6K-8WQ

      REASON TV: CLASS ENVY = IMMATURITY, IGNORANCE:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yt7urGdlr_Y

      • caveman

        Well said,,,,

    • Anonymous

      When talking about raising income taxes on the wealthy it is important to understand exactly who is in that category. What most people don’t realize is that based on the administration’s definition of rich as individuals making over $200,000 includes the most successful small businesses. The tax system is currently designed so that the income generated from a small business flows through to the owner who reports it on his individual tax return. It is set up this way to prevent small business owners from being taxed twice and enables them to reinvest the money to expand their operations and hire more people.  (http://eng.am/pPcerV)Using data from 2009, one can see that if taxes were raised on people making over $200,000 then Congress would be raising taxes on over 20% of small businesses. (http://eng.am/qjb8vl) Not only does this quarter of small businesses make up 21% of all U.S. employers (http://eng.am/mQMZ6V), but one can assume that these are the most successful of the small businesses and have the most ability to hire more employees. Congress needs to figure out a way to close revenue gap while also creating jobs. Raising taxes on the most successful small businesses does not sound like a good way to accomplish either.  

    • Anonymous

      When talking about raising income taxes on the wealthy it is important to understand exactly who is in that category. What most people don’t realize is that based on the administration’s definition of rich as individuals making over $200,000 includes the most successful small businesses. The tax system is currently designed so that the income generated from a small business flows through to the owner who reports it on his individual tax return. It is set up this way to prevent small business owners from being taxed twice and enables them to reinvest the money to expand their operations and hire more people.  (http://eng.am/pPcerV)Using data from 2009, one can see that if taxes were raised on people making over $200,000 then Congress would be raising taxes on over 20% of small businesses. (http://eng.am/qjb8vl) Not only does this quarter of small businesses make up 21% of all U.S. employers (http://eng.am/mQMZ6V), but one can assume that these are the most successful of the small businesses and have the most ability to hire more employees. Congress needs to figure out a way to close revenue gap while also creating jobs. Raising taxes on the most successful small businesses does not sound like a good way to accomplish either.  

  • Anonymous

    Was the part about the raising taxes when the market went down 200 points?
    How much is the “fair” share for those who can “afford” it?
    Does that inclue getting the near 50% of wage earners that pay no with holding tax paying their fair share?

  • cramos

    GOD Save us from the EGO of BHO!