The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller

Rick Perry, the anti-William Jennings Bryan

Texas governor and presidential candidate Rick Perry’s comments about Ben Bernanke and monetary policy have set off a firestorm. He is being criticized by both the left and the right.

But all he really did was offend modern-day sensibilities while raising one of the most important economic issues of our day. Those he offended need to study history. His passion and fiery speech are little different from the words spoken by William Jennings Bryan at the turn of the century.

At a cocktail party fundraiser Perry said:

“If this guy prints more money between now and the election, I dunno what y’all would do to him in Iowa but we would treat him pretty ugly down in Texas. Printing more money to play politics at this particular time in American history is almost treasonous in my opinion….We’ve already tried this. All it’s going to be doing is devaluing the dollar in your pocket and we cannot afford that. We have to learn the lessons of the past three years that they’ve been devastating.”

But one hundred and fifteen years ago, on July 9, 1896, at the Chicago Democratic Convention, William Jennings Bryan said:

“If they dare to come out in the open field and defend the gold standard as a good thing, we shall fight them to the uttermost, having behind us the producing masses of the nation and the world….we shall answer their demands for a gold standard by saying to them, you shall not press down upon the brow of labor this crown of thorns. You shall not crucify mankind upon a cross of gold.”

In essence, Perry and Bryan raise a centuries-old argument. Governments have always been tempted to manipulate the value of money. Most have done so, sometimes for purposes of greed or power; other times because of misguided policy reasons. Bryan wanted inflation for farmers. Rising productivity was pushing prices down and those farmers who were not increasing production were hurt financially. They wrongly blamed the gold standard, or “hard money,” for their problems. And even though it took another 17 years, his arguments ushered in the era of the Federal Reserve.

Since 1913, when the Federal Reserve was created, the rate of inflation in the U.S. has been consistently higher than it was prior to 1913. The Fed has made many mistakes. Milton Friedman said the Fed caused the Great Depression by allowing the money supply to collapse. In the 1970s, the Fed created double-digit inflation. Alan Greenspan’s low rates between 2003 and 2005 helped create the housing bubble. Lately, with the dollar falling and inflation rising, many can credibly point their fingers at the Fed as it holds interest rates near zero and finds new ways of interfering with financial markets and growing its balance sheet. It does all this with little interference from politicians.

  • http://www.facebook.com/duane.hardy1 Duane Hardy

    Before you bring judgement down on Rick Perry remember this…Liberals love their propaganda..Do not believe or respond to gossip or outrages comments about any of the Republican/Conservative Candidates..It’s easy to soft sell or plant a seed of doubt/ start unsupported rumors. If you don’t have proof beyond a doubt don’t believe it until their is proof..Rick Perry has been out their a long time, He has been re elected 3 times as governor in one of the largest multi culture and successful states in our country..Don’t like the scum bags on the left play you like a bunch of gullible fools..

  • Anonymous

    Nothing like building up a fop to make it sound like he has a clue about monetary policy. The author inhabits that land of make-believe where Ron Paul doesn’t exist. 

    I look forward to seeing Governor Perry handle this issue in the next debate. A D student, verses a man who has graduated from Duke University’s School of Medicine, and authored books on monetary policy, the Federal Reserve and the gold standard. 

    It will require some serious string-pulling to extricate Perry from that bloodbath looking good!

  • Meridian

    As always, Brian, right on the money!

  • Badgered

    Let’s see, one referenced violence (yes, we understand it probably not meant as though he would actually perform or condone an act of violence against Bernanke, but this is a man who jogs while armed……) the other referenced a political fight with no implied violence.  A big difference in reteric.  Should veiled threats (fiery language or not) of violence really be held up as a positive example?  I’m for Bachmann anyhow, bring on that $2 gasoline!

  • Gridmark

    Well, there is no perfect economics. Yes, today the fed is printing money, but this is a result of facing another recession or near depression. I think the fed reacts, for the most part, to the economic and political decisions of that time. For today, they, as well as democrats and republicans, still support free trade in which we have lost millions of jobs. And what we see today is that democrats are spending, the republicans want more and more tax cuts, and fed with low interest rates and a low dollar so that we can export more with 1/3 less manufacturing, all to try to stimulate the economy to create jobs. The problem is that it is hard to have an economic recovery if the jobs don’t exist and as we keep sending jobs overseas. So, it is in this case, the symptoms making everyone making irrational decisions. Of course, the fed feels the need to print money to prevent a recession and they are right to that point as we do not want to fall into a recession. But they have ignored the problems of globalization and as I said before, it is irrational decision by everyone. 

    It was totally inappropriate to print the money during the 2003-2005 era, as well as having tax cuts for so long. As we lost the jobs, all the stimulus was done during that time and we have no stimulus today. So, in effect, Bush had his roaring 20′s and we face a near depression today. And we see why, today, just how Roosevelt was confronted with this situation as there was no private economy. 

    Normally, to stimulate an economy, you have two or three years of lowering taxes with the fed accommodating and the economy is fine on its own. However, Bush used his tax cuts (which was borrowed and spent money) as an ideology and today we are in a situation where the tax cuts are less effective to create the economic growth we need. It was totally inappropriate at that time to artificially keep stimulating the economy while we were sending our jobs overseas, as our money went to Iraq, and the neglect of our infrastructure. Today, we lost all the stimulus as everyone is struggling to find that stimulus. But you cannot stimulate what you don’t have in the private sector. And that is the loss of 6 million jobs or 57,000 factories closed over the past decade. (Also a housing crisis) And that ignorance is still going on today. You need demand, and no one has come up with the solution for demand. And it is not only demand for us, but we have added an additional 2 billion cheap laborers to the free market system since communism fell. And with that, our middle class keeps losing on jobs and on wages. And we are not hearing any answers from anyone. 

    • Mbluetifer7

      for every American job shipped overseas why not create another one like it. take polaris as an example. they are moving their 4 wheel ATV production unit to Mexico. well the workers who do not want to pul up family roots could buy ,the company through a stock purchase option.

      • Gridmark

        It’s possible. We will have to find innovative ways. However, I don’t even blame a lot of companies as they have to deal with competition the likes we have never seen before and they have to look for lower wages. We have never seen a phenomenon like this before. We are talking about 57,000 closed factories or six million jobs over the past decade. We are up against 2 billion cheap laborers, automation and more loss of jobs, lean principles and more loss of jobs, and mergers and consolidation and more loss of jobs. 

        What we have not done over the past two or three decades was to invest in our country, in our people, and in the future. We went with a failed ideology of tax cuts and laissez-faire and the middle class lost.

        Invest in the country: Infrastructure, energy independence, high speed internet, a new air traffic control system in which you get 12% fuel savings, etc.

        Invest in the people: Mandatory vocational training to deal with globalization and the loss of jobs.

        Invest in the future: Federal research grants to universities for research so that new jobs can come out in the private sector. Hopefully jobs that will stay in the country. 

        What we have not done, and what Clinton failed to do, was to put a tariff on goods coming back to our country on a sliding scale till other country’s wages came closer to ours. It is too late for that now. And perhaps there is a conspiracy to ruin the middle class. Maybe it is the New World Order, if so, they won. I have never seen so many economists and pundits wrong over the years. 

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_34QNZG6H55WIHDRCXV56LVIG5Q Decoy

          Did you write Obummer talikng points? Where go the unions fit in this rant of yours against conservative ideas? Get the government and unions the hell out of the way and watch the economy grow.

          • Gridmark

            You are in denial. You have 2 billion cheap laborers who want our jobs and it ruining the middle class jobs and wages. Been watching this since 2004 when Bush came to my state and said “free trade is good” and the factories closed. You cannot tell me what widgets can be made here and not some other country. And you cannot tell me how you support small business when factories are closed in a community. There is nothing that will replace those lost jobs and we lost all the stimulus. Even Foxconn in China will replace their workers with 1 million robots over the next three years as they are getting “paid too much.”

  • Bukrafilmishmish

    Nicely done.  Enjoyed your talk in Tulsa yesterday.