The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller

Christine O’Donnell’s problem is the conservative movement’s dilemma

What conservative doesn’t sympathize with Christine O’Donnell for walking off the set of CNN’s Piers Morgan Tonight? Morgan, after all, had O’Donnell on his show ostensibly because of her new book, Troublemaker: Let’s Do What It Takes to Make America Great Again.

Yet Morgan seemed more interested in asking the young Christian conservative titillating questions about sex than he did in engaging her in a substantive discussion about her new book.

“Christine O’Donnell shares views on sex,” brags CNN on its website. “CNN’s Piers Morgan asks former Senate candidate Christine O’Donnell about masturbation, sex and lust.”

But while O’Donnell’s frustration with Morgan is understandable, her reaction was a serious mistake. It suggests that she is uncomfortable discussing, and unprepared to discuss, contentious public policy questions involving difficult social issues such as gay marriage, the teaching of sexual abstinence in the public schools and the role of religion in American public life.

Unfortunately, though, these issues cannot be ignored. The size, reach and influence of the federal government is such that its purview extends now even into our homes, schools, communities and religious institutions. And so, conservatives have no choice but to engage the public dialogue on questions and issues that most people, understandably, would rather not discuss.

Yet, unless and until conservatives become as fluent and persuasive on social and cultural matters as they are on, say, tax reform and foreign policy, they will continue to lose ground to the left. And, as with learning a foreign language, the only way you gain fluency is through practice — through real, hard-fought substantive engagement with your political opponents.

In short, conservatives have to expect liberal-legacy media types such as Morgan to be unfair. They have to expect hostile questions designed to make them look strange and weird. They have to expect questions designed to portray them as the odd, alien “other.”

That’s unfortunate; that’s wrong. But life is unfair, and we conservatives have to deal with that. We have to engage the public dialogue and fight back — not cower and retreat in the face of hostile fire.

Christine O’Donnell has an opportunity now to help change people’s minds and to help shape the public dialogue. She should seize that opportunity.

John R. Guardiano is a writer and analyst in Arlington, Virginia. He writes and blogs for a variety of publications, including FrumForum, the American Spectator and The Daily Caller. Follow him at his personal blog, ResoluteCon.com, and on Twitter @JohnRGuardiano.

  • Anonymous

    Yes, asking someone about the poorly considered statements that made them famous in the first place is just so wrong.

  • http://twitter.com/JackDLavelle Jack Lavelle

    “The size, reach and influence of the federal government is such that its purview extends now even into our homes, schools, communities and religious institutions.”

    Say wow.  I don’t think there should be a constitutional amendment to define marriage as between a man and a woman.  I guess we can agree on that one.

  • Anonymous

    This is not her first rodeo/she has run for Senate on more than one occasion and has yet to be successful.  To not anticipate certain questions when agreeing to an interview sounds like a “rookie mistake” to me.  To then leave as she did was simply unprofessional. It is what gives Conservative woman a bad name IMHO/answer the question and move on….

  • redbankrick

    Our problem is that empty-suits like Sean Hannity never help vet these clowns; nothing but soft balls..how about starting out w/ have you ever had a real job in your life?????
    No wonder his audience is down 28% & in the last Nielsen he was behind Dr. Drew. Dr. Who????

    • Anonymous

      There’s another someone I wish they had asked that question of.  I’d give you his initials but they’ve changed a lot over the years.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_IJ4I7WFS6DP3BSEF5DGRCTWFRQ Karl Magnus

    QUOTE: “What conservative doesn’t sympathize with Christine O’Donnell for walking off the set of CNN’s Piers Morgan Tonight?”THIS one.IF Ms. O’Donnell were intelligent and articulate, she COULD have sliced and diced Morgan into submission. Instead, she storms off the set like a petulant child. She makes the Tea Party appear childish.I hope you uneducated Tea Party types who supported that moron are proud.Like Angell in Nevada, the Tea Party blew it BIG time with O’Donnell. TWO seats lost due simply to toeing the blathering line.~(Ä)~

    • KayJL

      Agreed.  Christine’s real problem is that at the ripe old age of 42, she’s the personnification of the term “failure to launch”.  What resume she’s got points to the work history, personal irresponsibility, and level of maturity of a 25 year old who’s still struggling to get a handle on her life.

      No amount of Tea Party support will ever legitimize her, and it’s absolutely true that having her out there as one of its spokespersons only makes the Tea Party looks as childish as she is.

  • Anonymous

    Gay marriage is just another entitlement coveted by minority group. Illegals aliens feel entitled to US citizenship, public employees feel entitled to defined benefit retirement plans, people who don’t work feel entitled to more of the income well-to-do people earn. Gimme, gimme, gimme.

  • Seamac

    Christine O’Donnell’s time has come and gone. She’s obviously a twit who lacking any marketable job skills, is now hawking her book simply to make some money while extending her 15 minutes of fame.
    And BTW – what in the world is a, “liberal-legacy media type”?

  • Lstorie3

    Who cares about the damn question that Piers Morgan asked when “the size, reach and influence of the federal government is such that its purview extends into our homes, schools, and religious institutions”? Conservatives ought not be ringing their hands about a slightly bloated Brit asking questions on TV when the federal government has its tentacles in every corner of our lives. My God, in less than 30 years we have gone from calling for the abolition of the Dept. of Education to conceding that big government is a fact of life? Holey moley, what happened to the Republican Party?