The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller
3rd November 1976:  James Earl Carter, 39th President of the United States of America, addressing a meeting at the end of his presidential campaign.  (Photo by Central Press/Getty Images) 3rd November 1976: James Earl Carter, 39th President of the United States of America, addressing a meeting at the end of his presidential campaign. (Photo by Central Press/Getty Images)  

Does academic achievement bring Oval Office success?

How smart do we want our presidents to be, and what does their academic performance tell us about their chances for success?

This month Texas Gov. Rick Perry’s college transcript was leaked, and the Republican presidential contender’s academic performance at Texas A&M turned out to be less than stellar. Perry’s critics seized on the document to suggest that he didn’t have the aptitude to serve as leader of the free world.

Is there a correlation between success in the White House and a president’s perceived intelligence, or at least between academic performance and Oval Office success?

American University historian Allan Lichtman told The Daily Caller that he believes so.

“If you look at some of the least successful presidents,” he said, “they’re not exactly known for their [intellectual] prowess … Whereas the most brilliant of the presidents are all either very successful or at least reasonably successful.”

How, then, does one explain Jimmy Carter, thought to be smart but generally considered a not-so-great president? What of Ronald Reagan, media-cast as an “amiable dunce” but considered by many to be a historically great chief executive?

“Reagan was smarter than people give him credit for,” Licthman said. “It is a very rough correlation, and there will be exceptions, but overall it is a reasonable correlation.”

Presidential historian Richard Norton Smith, who is a scholar-in-residence in history and public policy at George Mason University, disagrees.

“I don’t think there is a direct correlation between success in the classroom as tested by a grade book and success in the Oval Office,” he told TheDC.

Smith explained that Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who is regularly ranked among America’s greatest presidents by historians, had an “undistinguished” academic career but had a type of intelligence that was more important than book smarts.

“FDR had an incredible emotional intelligence. FDR read people, not books,” Smith said. “His career in college was undistinguished, but then, frankly, you know, there were lots of ‘Gentleman’s C’s’ at Harvard in those days.”

Smith continued: “What Roosevelt demonstrated from an early age was a capacity for leadership, and that is something that dramatically accelerated with age. It wasn’t something he learned in a classroom. It is something he learned from life.”

Rice University historian Douglas Brinkley told TheDC that he, too, rejects the idea of a correlation between academic success or brilliance with success in the presidency.

“Harry Truman never went to college and I think he’s usually ranked number five of all-time presidents,” Brinkley noted. “People like Lyndon Johnson, you know, who brought all these social programs, Medicaid, Medicare, the Civil Rights Act and all, had just gone to San Marcos College.”

  • cramos

    Obama’s intelligence has been promoted by the Press……for the truth of the matter is that Obama’s school record has been kept a secret……..so there are no facts here to convince only clever PR.

    I cannot wait till he is out of office and the facts come out……I am sure the truth will surprise many!

  • Anonymous

    When you consider that BHO did not write “Dreams of My Father” by himself it really makes you wonder how intelligent he really is. For sure he does not give a rip about what other people think or want. On the other hand at least Rick Perry does listen to people and I think he tries to do what they want. Perry is not like BHO, he is not a narcissistic person.