Politics
Getty --- Ford Hood shooting Getty --- Ford Hood shooting  

Fort Hood victims’ families seek $750M from feds

Photo of Kenneth Timmerman
Kenneth Timmerman
President, Foundation for Democracy in Iran
  • See All Articles
  • Subscribe to RSS
  • Bio

      Kenneth Timmerman

      Kenneth R. Timmerman is an investigative reporter, author, and President/CEO of the Foundation for Democracy in Iran. His books and an illustrated bio are available at KenTimmerman.com.

More than 80 family members and victims of Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan’s jihadist shooting spree at Fort Hood, Texas on Nov. 5, 2009, have filed a claim seeking $750 million in damages from the United States government.

Under federal rules, the agencies have six months to resolve the claim, filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, or they can face public lawsuits in civil courts.

Neal Sher, a New York attorney representing the claimants, said the Department of Defense, the Department of the Army, the Department of Justice and the FBI all possessed “substantial knowledge and warning signs that Hasan posed a grave danger” to the soldiers and civilians he worked with, but  “did nothing to eliminate the known risk he posed.”

Even though the U.S. government was aware Hasan was in contact with known al-Qaida terrorism recruiter Anwar al-Awlaqi, the Palestinian-American officer “was promoted to higher ranks within the Army, virtually assuring that he would be in a position to commit the murderous terror attack at Fort Hood,” Sher said.

Maj. Hasan came to the attention of officers within his hierarchy in the Army’s medical corps some 18 months before his shooting spree, when he made a 50-slide PowerPoint presentation explaining the Quran and the implications of Islamic ideology for Muslims serving in the U.S. military.

Although he was scheduled to make a presentation relating to his specialty — psychiatry — Major Hasan instead hectored an audience of 25 Army medical officers at Walter Reed Army Medical Center with a presentation entitled “The Koranic World View as it Relates to Muslims in the U.S. Military,” the Washington Post revealed a few days after the shootings.

In it, Maj. Hasan cited instances where Muslim soldiers had turned against their fellow soldiers in the U.S. military, and argued that to avoid such “adverse effects,” the Department of Defense should allow Muslims “the option of being released as conscientious objectors” rather than be forced to fight fellow Muslims on the battlefield.

Hasan’s presentation of the Koranic concepts of jihad, abrogation and fatwas were steeped in Islamic orthodoxy, says Steven Coughlin, a former U.S. military jurist who specializes in analyzing Islamic legal texts.

“A review of the briefing Major Hasan gave to fellow officers reveals that his open declaration of jihad accurately tracked with Islamic legal principles as they have been presented and interpreted over many centuries by Muslim jurists,” Coughlin told The Daily Caller . “There was nothing that wouldn’t pass the smell test of Islamic orthodoxy.

Despite a wealth of “solid credible information demonstrating Hasan’s radicalization to violent Islamist extremism,” the U.S. government did nothing to stop him, Sher said. “On the contrary, bowing to political correctness, the agencies utterly ignored the threat he presented.”

That “political correctness” did not end with Hasan’s shooting spree. The 86-page official U.S. Army investigation never once mentioned the words “Islam,” “jihad,” or “Muslim,” even though he shouted “Allah-u Akbar” as he opened fire on his victims. The report referred to him as an “alleged perpetrator.”

The report’s authors call “Islamic extremism” — a phrase that occurs only once in the entire report, in a footnote referencing an FBI publication — a “trend” in U.S. counter-intelligence “research,” not a motivator to Maj. Hasan’s killing spree.

Islamist ideology is “like a rope,” says Tennessee state legislator Rick Womick, a former U.S. Air Force F-15 pilot, referring to the act of twisting strands together. “You cannot separate the religion from the ideology. If you are a true Muslim, you believe in all of it.”

The fact that Hasan based his jihadi massacre at Fort Hood on Islamic ideology should teach U.S. military leaders a lesson, Rep. Womick told a Nov. 11 Nashville, Tenn., conference on stopping the influx of Sharia law.  “We cannot allow Muslims to serve in our military because we cannot trust them,” he said.

“If they truly are a devout Muslim and follow the Quran and the Sunnah, then I feel threatened because they’re commanded to kill me,” he said.