Politics

Middle East a ‘much more dangerous situation’ than ever before, says former military commander

Daily Caller News Foundation logo
Michael Bastasch DCNF Managing Editor
Font Size:

NORFOLK, Va. — In the third presidential debate on Monday both candidates must address the widespread security concerns that have presented themselves in the Arab world in recent times, says a former military commander.

“We are in a much more dangerous situation today in the Arab world than at any time,” said Lt. Colonel Steve Russell, a former U.S. Army officer who played a key role in the capture of Saddam Hussein and author of the book We Got Him which details that capture, “and I don’t think that was created by our policies in Afghanistan and Iraq.”

“My question to the president would be, if al Qaeda is on the run, are they running to our embassies?” Russell said.

“It has absolutely unraveled because of delays in Libya, mishandlings in Egypt, absolute non-appearance in Syria, turning our back on Israel,” Russell told the Daily Caller News Foundation.

“That’s a dangerous cocktail, and I want to know how the President is going to fix that,” Russell added, “and I would like to know Governor Romney’s vision for fixing that after November 6.”

“You had contained enemies, such as Libya and Syria that may not have ever been on your side but they also didn’t want to do anything to upset the United States,” Russell said. “That’s not true anymore.”

The September 11, 2012 attack that killed U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans has put President Obama under fire, in particular from Republicans and the Romney campaign.

“How in the world would you send any United States ambassador into any situation in an unarmored vehicle, protected by two people, on September 11th in a volatile situation? Mr. President what is up with that? The American people would like to know.”

The U.S. recently sent troops to the Syria-Jordan border to prevent the violence already plaguing Syria from spreading into Jordan — a strong U.S. ally. Under Assad, Syria has not been friendly to U.S. security interests, said Russell.

“By what scenario where Assad stays in power does the United States benefit? I don’t think there is one,” Russell said.

“And then you’ve got staunch allies, like Israel and Egypt,” he added. “We’ve thrown 40 years of great Egypt policy under the bus, and we’re turning our back on an ally that we’ve stood by in Israel for a long time.”

Relations between the U.S. and Egypt have been strained since the fall of former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak last year, and relations were further strained after Egyptian demonstrators overran the U.S. embassy the same day as the Libya attacks.

“That may not be a concern of every American, but I tell you what, it’s a concern of every soldier because if Egypt becomes militant, they have the capacity to cause a lot of problems,” Russell said.

Russell also remains concerned about U.S. policy towards Iran, especially since The New York Times reported over the weekend that the U.S. and Iran have agreed to unilateral negotiations — which the White House has now denied.

“What is the U.S. plan besides saying we’re not going to allow it? Now we’re talking unilateral talks with Iran after the election? That’s very dangerous,” Russell said.

“This is a dangerous cocktail we’re making, and now we keep trying to make some type of tough statement against Iran as they continue to make centrifuges and enrich uranium,” he said. “They’re going to get the bomb because of our inaction.”

“We have to do that as a community of world nations, to put that kind of pressure on or we assume too great of risk as the United States,” Russell added. “If what we calculate with Iran fails, we’ve screwed it up for the whole world which really relies on that region for their energy sources.”

Russell also believes that both candidates need to seriously look at the U.S.’s commitment to the war in Afghanistan.

“Each candidate needs to answer, do you believe that Afghanistan is a long range national security interest of the United States,” said Russell. “If the answer to that is yes, then at what length are we willing to defend that national security interest?”

“If the answer to that question is no, Afghanistan is not important to us,” Russell added, “then why did we fight there for ten years and why have we of our generation of soldiers lost so many good friends and given our own efforts in Afghanistan?”

Russell is also against a strict, defined timeline for pulling out of Afghanistan, arguing that it should be based on certain conditions.

“I want some reassurance from Governor Romney that he understands the international affairs of the region,” Russell said when asked what Romney needs to do to establish his credibility on foreign policy.

“I don’t think he’s ignorant on foreign policy, but he certainly has to reassure Americans that he understands because I don’t think the people of the United States have the stomach to get into more wars,” Russell concluded.

Follow Michael on Twitter

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallrnewsfoundation.org.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.