A school district is attempting to force teachers to pay union dues for the next 10 years, despite being located in Michigan, which is now a right-to-work state that specifically prohibits mandatory unionization.
Michigan became the 24th right-to-work state in December. But the law doesn’t take effect until March 28 — giving unions time to grandfather in their contracts if they can get them approved before the deadline. As part of this effort, the Taylor School District approved an entirely separate “union security agreement” that will force teachers to keep paying the union until 2023.
Under the security agreement, teachers’ only options will be to pay union dues, or pay an agency fee amounting to about $800 a year.
But three Taylor teachers who want to leave the union said enough is enough.
“I believe it is unfair of the union to have a security clause that requires me to be a member for 10 years,” said Rebecca Metz, a Taylor teacher, in a statement.
Metz, along with fellow teachers Angela Steffke and Nancy Rhatigan, is suing to block implementation the 10-year dues extension.
A lawyer representing the three teachers framed the issue as a clear case of a union and a school district attempting to thwart the will of the legislature.
“The legislature has said that you should not have to pay any money to a union, whether it be agency fees or dues, as a condition of employment,” said Derk Wilcox, senior attorney at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy’s Legal Foundation, in an interview with The Daily Caller News Foundation. “This is definitely a way to try to get around that and keep people paying the unions as long as they can.”
While it’s unclear how the Wayne County Circuit Court will rule, the best outcome for the three teachers would likely involve tossing out the 10-year security agreement. If that happens, they would still be bound to the union’s collective bargaining agreement, which was also approved by the district in advance of the March 28 deadline. This agreement lasts until 2017.
Slamming teachers with an additional commitment that last beyond the collective bargaining agreement is itself illegal, according to Wilcox.
“In Michigan we have a statute which disallows side agreements that continue on in effect after the collective bargaining agreements expire,” he said.