The gloomy prospects for tax reform

Photo of Daniel Mitchell
Daniel Mitchell
Senior Fellow, Cato Institute
  • See All Articles
  • Subscribe to RSS
  • Bio

      Daniel Mitchell

      Dan Mitchell is a Senior Fellow at the <a href="http://www.cato.org/">Cato Institute</a> in Washington, DC. He is one of the nation's experts on the flat tax and has been the leading international voice in the fight to preserve tax competition, financial privacy, and fiscal sovereignty.

      Dan's work has been published in the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Washington Times, Washington Post, National Review, Villanova Law Review, Public Choice, Journal of Regulation and Social Cost, Emory Law Journal, Forbes, USA Today, Offshore Investment, Playboy, Investor's Business Daily, and Worldwide Reinsurance Review. He has appeared on all the major networks, including CBS, NBC, ABC, FOX, CNN, CNBC, MSNBC and C-SPAN.

      Prior to joining Cato, Dan worked for the Heritage Foundation, Senator Bob Packwood, and Citizens for a Sound Economy. Dan also spent more than three years beginning every day by co-hosting a television show. Dan earned a Ph.D. in economics from George Mason University and undergraduate and Masters degrees from the University of Georgia.

Is tax reform impossible? That’s a depressing topic to address on Tax Day, particularly since I’ve spent the past 20 years pushing for tax reform.

I hate to think that my life has been wasted, but let’s consider several reasons why it’s become more difficult to scrap the Internal Revenue Code and implement a simple and fair system such as the flat tax.

1. The barnacle effect — Our tax code is now a 74,000-page monstrosity, and it seems that politicians make the system more convoluted every year with new credits, deductions, exemptions, preferences, exclusions, and other special provisions.

Every new layer of complexity is akin to more barnacles on a ship, undermining performance. In theory, it makes sense to scrape off these barnacles and restore the ship, but that requires some degree of long-run thinking.

Our political system, though, is dominated by lawmakers who tend not to think past the next election cycle. That makes it difficult to convince them to undertake a big project, even if they’re sympathetic to tax reform.

2. The redistribution effect — I’ve never agreed with the deterministic political analysis about “makers” vs “takers,” but there’s little doubt that a growing number of Americans now see tax returns as a vehicle for getting money from the government.

I’m not talking about the fiscal illusion that results when some people over-pay their taxes and then are happy to get a refund. Those people should get dunked in cold water until they realize it doesn’t make sense to give politicians an interest-free loan.

But I’m talking about a different crowd. There are now millions of Americans who benefit from redistribution programs that are laundered through the tax code. The “earned income credit” is the best-known example. Simply stated, “refundable” credits allow people to get checks from the government even if they didn’t pay any tax.

Needless to say, those people don’t have much incentive to oppose the current system.

3. The corruption effect — The metropolitan DC area is now the wealthiest region of the nation; it includes 10 of America’s 15 richest counties. But most of this prosperity is the result of “rent-seeking,” which is a dorky term economists use to describe what happens when people use the coercive power of government to obtain unearned wealth.

One of the main sources of that unearned — and undeserved — prosperity is the tax code, which takes money from the economy’s productive sector and gives it to DC-based bureaucracies.

But the real problem (at least in terms of fixing the tax code) is that Washington is a boomtown in part because so many people make big bucks manipulating the tax code. Lobbyists obviously would hate a simple and fair flat tax, but there are also pervasively corrupt segments of the economy, such as the ethanol industry, that rely on favoritism in the tax code. And you better believe those folks never wander too far from the corridors of power.

Many of these insiders are former politicians and former Capitol Hill staffers — particularly those that worked on the tax-writing committees. They make big bucks, and the current staffers look forward to the day when they can cash in on their “government service” and start “earning” huge salaries. Needless to say, these people are not exactly advocates of reform.