FILE - In this June 25, 2013, file photo President Barack Obama wipes perspiration from his brow during an ambitious speech about climate change under a steaming hot sun at Georgetown University in Washington. Frustrated by a recalcitrant Congress, Obama has vowed to take climate change into his own hands and is starting the task of executing his plan to stem the warming of the earth. His plan is a complicated mix of rulemaking and federal permitting that’s tough to encapsulate in a neat sales pitch, and may be even tougher to put into action. But by going it alone and pledging to use his authority under existing laws, Obama has freed himself from the need to sell the plan to skeptical lawmakers. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File)

Reuters editor attacked by media for ‘climate skepticism’

A managing editor at Reuters has been accused of being a global warming skeptic and not running articles on the topic.

Global warming coverage fell 50 percent after Reuters hired Paul Ingrassia as deputy editor, Media Matters reports.

The issue came to light after former Reuters climate correspondent David Fogarty wrote about it on an insider blog. Fogarty said Ingrassia told him personally he was “skeptical” of global warming, and that after he became deputy editor, “getting any climate change-themed story published got harder.”

Fogarty charged Ingrassia with putting personal politics above scientific truth. He pointed to President Obama as an expert in the science of measuring temperatures for all regions of the planet over a period of centuries and assessing the impact of industrialization on climate change.

“President Obama gets it. Just read his latest climate action plan,” Fogarty wrote. “The scientific community gets it.”

Left-wing outlets such as The Guardian, Mother Jones, and Think Progress have pushed the story of Ingrassia’s skepticism toward global warming orthodoxy. An article in the Columbia Journalism Review quoted several Reuters journalists anonymously saying they had been pressured to include more global warming “balance” by including the views of skeptics.

But the case may be more complicated than it seems, since global warming coverage has been declining across all sources. According to the CJR article, The Guardian cut climate change coverage by 21% in 2011, and The New York Times by about 15%.

More recently, The New York Times closed its environmental desk and ended its “Green Blog” after failing to update it for several weeks.


Follow Charles on Twitter