Business
              In this April 3, 2013 photo, Mike Caldwell, a 35-year-old software engineer, holds a 25 Bitcoin token at his shop in Sandy, Utah. Caldwell mints physical versions of bitcoins, cranking out homemade tokens with codes protected by tamper-proof holographic seals, a retro-futuristic kind of prepaid cash. With up to 70,000 transactions each day over the past month, bitcoins have been propelled from the world of Internet oddities to the cusp of mainstream use, a remarkable breakthrough for a currency which made its online debut only four years ago. (AP Photo/Rick Bowmer)

Bitcoin regulation likely as states and feds warn of criminal use

After last week’s federal ruling that alternative electronic currency Bitcoin is real money, state and federal governments are already jumping at the chance to see when and how to regulate the novel technology.

The Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee sent a letter to seven federal agencies asking for information about any policies already enacted concerning the virtual currency, according to The Hill.

The letter also raised concerns that the virtual currencies’ “near anonymous and decentralized nature has attracted criminals who value few things more than being allowed to operate in the shadows.”

Under superintendent Ben Lawsky, the New York Department of Financial Services has also opened an inquiry, issuing 22 subpoenas to companies using Bitcoin across the country.

“If virtual currencies remain a virtual Wild West for narcotraffickers and other criminals,” Lawsky wrote, “that would not only threaten our country’s national security, but also the very existence of the virtual currency industry as a legitimate business enterprise.”

Bitcoin and other virtual money enterprises have been called out for national security risks, drug money laundering and various other criminal operations.

The digital currency allows users to interact directly with each other without any government interference.

Mt. Gox, the largest Bitcoin exchange, had an account seized by the Department of Homeland Security in May for failing to have proper money transmitter licenses. After properly registering as a money service with the U.S. Treasury, the exchange has been allowed to resume operations.

But Jim Harper, the director of information policy at the libertarian Cato Institute, thinks the risks from criminals and terrorists are no higher for Bitcoin than for traditional U.S. currency.

“I think the trade off between Bitcoin and cash for national security risks is about the same,” Harper told The Daily Caller News Foundation. “The challenges are similar in tracking money, but Bitcoin actually uses a central registry of where Bitcoin is, where it comes from and where it’s gone,” which may make it easier to track than traditional currency.

“I think it’s mostly bureaucratic impulses and trumped-up national security risks,” Harper said.

A leaked FBI document from 2012 revealed the agency believes Bitcoin could be a unique opportunity for criminal masterminds to launder money and for hackers to take advantage of innocent users.

While virtual currency company Liberty Reserve was shut down in May 2013 for laundering a total of $6 billion of criminal funds, at its very peak Bitcoin’s entire market share was less than $3 billion total, Harper explained. Large movements of drug money have been conducted in dollars, not virtual currency.