The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller
              FILE - This Feb. 12, 2013 file photo shows President Barack Obama, flanked by Vice President Joe Biden and House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio, giving his State of the Union address during a joint session of Congress on Capitol Hill in Washington.  It was a moment for Barack Obama to savor. His second inaugural address over, Obama paused as he strode from the podium last January, turning back for one last glance across the expanse of the National Mall, where a supportive throng stood in the winter chill to witness the launch of his new term. "I want to take a look, one more time," Obama said quietly. "I  FILE - This Feb. 12, 2013 file photo shows President Barack Obama, flanked by Vice President Joe Biden and House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio, giving his State of the Union address during a joint session of Congress on Capitol Hill in Washington. It was a moment for Barack Obama to savor. His second inaugural address over, Obama paused as he strode from the podium last January, turning back for one last glance across the expanse of the National Mall, where a supportive throng stood in the winter chill to witness the launch of his new term. "I want to take a look, one more time," Obama said quietly. "I'm not going to see this again."There was so much Obama could not _ or did not _ see then, as he opened his second term with a confident call to arms and an expansive liberal agenda. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak, File-Pool)   

There is no ‘Union’ to give a state of

Photo of Mike Church
Mike Church
Host, The Mike Church Show

The Conflict

If Senator Daniel Webster was correct in 1830, that our “consolidated union” was actually made whole by federal taxation and debt being owned by every state, then we must have the strongest union in the history of strong unions, Sampson and Delilah be shamed. Webster went so far as to praise taxes and debt as holy relics of our deified state, going so far as saying “to this species of consolidation every true American ought to be attached.”

This belief was restated 35 years later in the amendment that made every and any act between man, woman, and beast possible, indeed Constitutional — what I like to call the miracle amendment, number XIV. “The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.” Note that the entities guaranteeing, nay, pace Webster, adoring the debt are “the United States” as opposed to what author Tom Woods calls one “single blob” of America.

Had the framers of the miracle amendment wished to “consolidate” the Union they could have written “the public debt of America.” Tonight President Obama will deliver the annual spectacle of our own self-importance, the State of the Union address, but as we shall see, there is no longer a Union to report on the state of.

In George Washington’s first attempt at a State of the Union address, you need not read beyond paragraph one to understand the entities that made up our union and the role the new government played in that compact. After a salutation aimed at the new Senate and House of Representin‘, Washington wrote cheerfully of “The recent accession of the important state of North Carolina to the Constitution of the United States… [and] the general and increasing good will toward the government of the Union.” What does this tell us? Well, you can only “accede” to something by a voluntary act. Put another way, to accede is to “allow” meaning there is a choice in the matter where “decline” is what’s behind door number two. And to what has North Carolina acceded? “The government of the Union.”

Now you may ask, ‘Mike, why is this important?’ It is important because Washington had no power to extend over North Carolinians the benefits of something like “FatherOfOurCountryCare” until that state granted the authority, meaning the state owned the power. Thus the “Union” — Lincoln’s war notwithstanding — was and is what we, the people of the states, accede to. Will President Obama inform us of the “state” of the things we have acceded to? Or will he opt to continue the century-long practice of telling the American kingdom what some shall receive and what sacrifices will be required of others, whether they accede or not?