The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller
U.S. President Barack Obama delivers his State of the Union speech on Capitol Hill in Washington, January 28, 2014. REUTERS/Larry Downing U.S. President Barack Obama delivers his State of the Union speech on Capitol Hill in Washington, January 28, 2014. REUTERS/Larry Downing  

The president’s missed opportunity for bipartisan consensus on the environment

Photo of James Dozier
James Dozier
President, Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions

On Tuesday, President Obama made energy and the preservation of our climate an important part of his State of the Union address.  As the head of Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions – a grassroots non-profit dedicated to helping establish an environmentally sensible energy plan for our country — you might expect me to be thrilled about this fact. You would be wrong.

We thank President Obama for spotlighting American energy independence and the importance of addressing climate change in the State of the Union, but we are disappointed that the president has chosen to use these issues as election year political footballs, rather than doing the hard work of sitting down with Democrats and Republicans in the House and Senate and finding a way to move forward.

For far too long the issue of energy and the environment has become a deeply divisive and partisan issue. President Obama’s decision to circumvent Congress and use his executive authority to establish federal policy in this area will only serve to make the issue more divisive, more partisan, more radioactive, and ultimately serve to put action on the issue even more out of reach.

Perhaps the president should have taken a page out of President Reagan’s third State of the Union Address – delivered 30 years ago.  In that speech, President Reagan fought back against the notion that the responsibility of protecting the environment belonged to one political party when he said, “preservation of our environment is not a liberal or conservative challenge, it’s common sense.”

While the President and some Democratic-leaning interest groups would have you believe that executive action is the only way to protect our air and water, this is simply not the truth. There are glimmers of progress from Republicans and Democrats in both chambers who have proposed modest steps towards renewable energy development and conservation — legislation that provides opportunities to bridge the divide between the president and Congress.

Senator Rob Portman (R-OH) and Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) have introduced the Energy Savings and Industrial Competitiveness Act that uses a variety of low-cost tools to reduce barriers for private sector energy users and drive adoption of off-the-shelf efficiency technologies that will save businesses and consumers money, make America more energy independent, and reduce emissions. Efficiency technologies are commercially available today, can be widely deployed in every state in the nation, and pay for themselves through energy savings relatively quickly.

Representative Cory Gardner (R-CO) and Representative Peter Welch (D-VT) have introduced the Energy Savings Through Public-Private Partnerships Act that would save taxpayer dollars without additional appropriations by encouraging federal agencies to enter into energy savings performance contracts and utility energy service contracts. Under these contracts, an energy service company negotiates a contract with a federal agency that specifies the amount of energy savings it will achieve through retrofits and other measures. The company is then paid for its performance out of the savings it achieves rather than through appropriated funds.