Opinion
United Auto Workers President Bob King listens as Secretary-Treasurer Dennis Williams answers questions during a news conference at the Chattanooga Electrical Apprenticeship and Training Center after the announcement that the union lost its bid to represent the 1,550 blue-collar workers at the Volkswagen plant in Chattanooga, Tennessee, February 14, 2014. REUTERS/Christopher Aluka Berry United Auto Workers President Bob King listens as Secretary-Treasurer Dennis Williams answers questions during a news conference at the Chattanooga Electrical Apprenticeship and Training Center after the announcement that the union lost its bid to represent the 1,550 blue-collar workers at the Volkswagen plant in Chattanooga, Tennessee, February 14, 2014. REUTERS/Christopher Aluka Berry  

The UAW against democracy, free speech in Chattanooga

Photo of Matt Patterson
Matt Patterson
Executive Director, Center for Worker Freedom, ATR
  • See All Articles
  • Subscribe to RSS
  • Bio

      Matt Patterson

      Matt Patterson is senior editor at Capital Research Center, where he oversees the publications Green Watch and Labor Watch. In 2009-2010 he was a National Review Institute Washington Fellow. Previously he served as research assistant to Charles Krauthammer and policy communications coordinator for the Rudy Giuliani presidential campaign. Matt's columns and commentary have appeared in the Washington Post, FOXNews.com, New York Post, Washington Times, and American Thinker, among many others. He is the author of "Union of Hearts: The Abraham Lincoln & Ann Rutledge Story."

The United Auto Workers (UAW) lost its bid to organize Volkswagen’s Chattanooga, Tennessee auto factory on February 14th.

The VW employees voted 712-626 against UAW representation in what can only be described as one of the most epic failures in the history of organized labor.

The financial and political fallout of the loss has received much commentary. But the union’s post-election actions have been, if anything, just as consequential: The UAW has filed an objection with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), claiming the election had been tainted by statements from Tennessee politicians during election week.

In particular, the union singled out statements made by U.S. Senator Bob Corker and State Senator Bo Watson: The former made clear that he had been told (by whom he did not say) that the VW facility would receive another production line if the workers rejected the union; the latter spoke for many local politicians when he said that the state would re-evaluate future tax incentives for VW should the union prevail.

Union reps also bitterly denounced efforts by the Center for Worker Freedom, a project of Americans for Tax Reform, to educate Chattanoogans about the history and political activities of this economically ruinous cartel. As Dennis Williams, current secretary-treasurer and soon-to-be president of the UAW, raged, “The NLRB needs to limit outside interference in the vote from [Americans for Tax Reform founder] Grover Norquist … and other conservatives that just want to hold workers back.”

Let’s be clear about what this says about the UAW: It doesn’t want elected officials to speak their minds, relate conversations that they have had, or speculate about future public expenditures. It doesn’t want people discussing how the union spends its money, or what politicians and radical causes it supports, or its role in the bankruptcies of General Motors and Detroit.

In other words, the union is petitioning the government to help it stifle speech that it does not like.

This hatred of free speech is nothing new for unions, of course. For decades they have funded liberal politicians who have then made laws restricting anti-union speech (so called “persuader” rules) while exempting unions from restrictions that bind everyone else, such as harassment and stalking laws.

The UAW is also making abundantly clear its contempt for the democratic process. The union fought to keep a secret ballot out of the election in Chattanooga because, current president Bob King said, this sacrosanct private act is “divisive.”  When workers were granted a secret ballot at VW anyway, the union fought to have complete and unrestricted access to workers at the plant, which VW was happy to grant, while simultaneously insisting that workers who wished to discuss alternatives to UAW representation were shut out (sadly, in this too Volkswagen was happy to oblige).