The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller
              Mark Hohn, a novice beekeeper, checks out bees in one of the hives in the backyard of his Kent home, Sept. 22, 2012. Dead honeybees from his 1.25-acre spread are the first in Washington confirmed to be infected by a parasitic fly. (AP Photo/The Seattle Times, Ellen M. Banner) SEATTLE OUT, USA TODAY OUT, MAGAZINES OUT, TELEVISION OUT, NO SALES, MANDATORY CREDIT

Flight of the honeybees’ commercial keepers — Part II

Photo of Paul Driessen
Paul Driessen
Senior Policy Advisor, Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow

Read part I here.

Having found that the global warming cri de coeur no longer loosens progressive purse strings, or stirs public anxieties, leftist groups like the Center for Food Safety and Pesticide Action Network North America have found a new cause.

As previous articles have noted, they are blaming an innovative new class of pesticides called neonicotinoids for both over-winter bee losses and “colony collapse disorder” or CCD.

Allied with several outspoken beekeepers, the activists are pressuring government regulatory agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency and Canada’s Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) to follow Europe’s lead – and ban neonics. Instead of protecting beekeepers’ livelihoods, their campaigns will likely expose bees to even greater harm.

The European Union’s decision to suspend use of a pesticide was a serious matter, but not because of the product. It was based on politics, rather than science. A shift in the party in power in France in May 2012 resulted in a new agriculture minister with an ax to grind. He banned the use of neonicotinoids in France.

“While the ban was popular politically,” British environmental commentator Richard North observed, “French farmers would be at a distinct disadvantage with the rest of Europe, if they were the only ones unable to use the pesticide. Syngenta estimated that they would lose €200 million [$278 million] per season, through lost yield and crop protection.”

So French agricultural minister Stephane Le Foll instructed his ministry to push for an EU-wide ban on all neonicotinoids. They lobbied the European Commission and European Food Safety Authority. After several votes and a misleading report on what the science shows, the European Commission delivered the French agricultural minister the ban he wanted.

The prohibition on using neonics was imposed over the strenuous objections of the UK, Germany and other EU members, who maintained that scientific evidence clearly demonstrated that the new pesticides were safe for bees, and farmers would be significantly harmed by any ban.

Now North American activists want Canada and the United States to repeat the EU mistake. They are counting on pressure group politics to work in their favor once again, because the science is increasingly against them.

A growing battery of years-long field tests have found that real-world, field-relevant exposure to neonics has no observable effects on bee colonies. Other studies have highlighted other significant insect, fungal, human, and other issues that, singly or collectively, could explain colony collapse disorder. Focusing on neonicotinoids, while ignoring these other serious problems, could easily perpetuate the colony collapse problem, while also creating many other difficulties for farmers.

Canadian bee experts have analyzed all bee death incidents reported to PMRA from 2007, when record keeping began, until 2012. They concluded that “very few of the serious bee kills involve neonicotinoid pesticides. Five times as many ‘major’ or ‘moderate’ pesticide-related bee kills were sourced to non-neonic chemicals.”